Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Roman Gurbat

dblp:119/8889 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › scientific visualization
computational steering
0.112012
Sketching Uncertainty into Simulations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2012
Visualization and visual analytics › interaction techniques
sketch-based interaction
0.112012
Sketching Uncertainty into Simulations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2012
Visualization and visual analytics
visual analytics
0.112012
Sketching Uncertainty into Simulations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sketch-based input · 0.3ensemble simulation · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Sketching Uncertainty into Simulations
abstract
In a variety of application areas, the use of simulation steering in decision making is limited at best. Research focusing on this problem suggests that most user interfaces are too complex for the end user. Our goal is to let users create and investigate multiple, alternative scenarios without the need for special simulation expertise. To simplify the specification of parameters, we move from a traditional manipulation of numbers to a sketch-based input approach. Users steer both numeric parameters and parameters with a spatial correspondence by sketching a change onto the rendering. Special visualizations provide immediate visual feedback on how the sketches are transformed into boundary conditions of the simulation models. Since uncertainty with respect to many intertwined parameters plays an important role in planning, we also allow the user to intuitively setup complete value ranges, which are then automatically transformed into ensemble simulations. The interface and the underlying system were developed in collaboration with experts in the field of flood management. The real-world data they have provided has allowed us to construct scenarios used to evaluate the system. These were presented to a variety of flood response personnel, and their feedback is discussed in detail in the paper. The interface was found to be intuitive and relevant, although a certain amount of training might be necessary.
Hrvoje Ribicic, Jürgen Waser, Roman Gurbat, Bernhard Sadransky, M. Eduard Gröller
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.3