Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

J. Alexander Fax

dblp:119/9699 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Distributed computing theory · 42% Mathematical optimization · 42% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 17%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed computing theory
consensus
0.222010
Reply to "Comments on "Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems"" · Proc. IEEE 2010
Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems · Proc. IEEE 2007
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis
0.222010
Reply to "Comments on "Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems"" · Proc. IEEE 2010
Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems · Proc. IEEE 2007
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › multi-agent systems
networked multi-agent systems
0.112007
Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems · Proc. IEEE 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

matrix theory · 0.1control theory · 0.1algebraic graph theory · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Reply to "Comments on "Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems""
abstract
There are essentially four points that Dr. Chebotarev's raises in [1]. Point 1. Chebotarev claims that Lemma 2 is not correct as stated and gives a counter example consisting of a simple directed tree. This counterexample points out two issues with the lemma as stated. The second portion of Lemma 2, referring to the case in which there are c components, only applies to graphs in which there are disjoint components of the graph (no edges between the components). This is clear from the proof of this fact (which simply consists of separating the nodes so that the Laplacian is block diagonal, implying a disjoint set of nodes), but is ambiguous in the statement of the lemma.
Reza Olfati-Saber, J. Alexander Fax, Richard M. Murray
Proc. IEEE2
2007 Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
abstract
This paper provides a theoretical framework for analysis of consensus algorithms for multi-agent networked systems with an emphasis on the role of directed information flow, robustness to changes in network topology due to link/node failures, time-delays, and performance guarantees. An overview of basic concepts of information consensus in networks and methods of convergence and performance analysis for the algorithms are provided. Our analysis framework is based on tools from matrix theory, algebraic graph theory, and control theory. We discuss the connections between consensus problems in networked dynamic systems and diverse applications including synchronization of coupled oscillators, flocking, formation control, fast consensus in small-world networks, Markov processes and gossip-based algorithms, load balancing in networks, rendezvous in space, distributed sensor fusion in sensor networks, and belief propagation. We establish direct connections between spectral and structural properties of complex networks and the speed of information diffusion of consensus algorithms. A brief introduction is provided on networked systems with nonlocal information flow that are considerably faster than distributed systems with lattice-type nearest neighbor interactions. Simulation results are presented that demonstrate the role of small-world effects on the speed of consensus algorithms and cooperative control of multivehicle formations.
Reza Olfati-Saber, J. Alexander Fax, Richard M. Murray
Proc. IEEE2