Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Claire Monteleoni

dblp:12/1067 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
22ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9488-0517ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 20 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 32% Robot navigation and mapping · 32% Learning theory · 30%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%
Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 83% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 17%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computing education · 61% Environmental and earth informatics · 39%

Topics — the 25 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
clustering
0.422017
Beyond the Nystrom Approximation: Speeding up Spectral Clustering using Uniform Sampling and Weighted Kernel k-means · IJCAI 2017
Streaming k-means approximation · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.452009
Analysis of Perceptron-Based Active Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2009
A general agnostic active learning algorithm · NIPS 2007
Practical Online Active Learning for Classification · CVPR 2007
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering
0.312017
Beyond the Nystrom Approximation: Speeding up Spectral Clustering using Uniform Sampling and Weighted Kernel k-means · IJCAI 2017
Computing education
machine learning research practices
0.212024
Position: Application-Driven Innovation in Machine Learning · ICML 2024
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization
0.212015
Environment selection and hierarchical place recognition · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › robot mapping
long-term mapping
0.212015
Environment selection and hierarchical place recognition · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
place recognition
0.212015
Environment selection and hierarchical place recognition · ICRA 2015
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.222011
Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Privacy-preserving logistic regression · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
label complexity
0.222009
Analysis of Perceptron-Based Active Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2009
A general agnostic active learning algorithm · NIPS 2007
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.222009
Analysis of Perceptron-Based Active Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2009
A general agnostic active learning algorithm · NIPS 2007
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
hidden markov model
0.112012
Global Climate Model Tracking Using Geospatial Neighborhoods · AAAI 2012
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.122009
Analysis of Perceptron-Based Active Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2009
Online Learning of Non-stationary Sequences · NIPS 2003
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization
0.112011
Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private learning
0.112011
Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Data mining › clustering › online clustering
data stream clustering
0.112009
Streaming k-means approximation · NIPS 2009
Data mining › clustering
k-means clustering
0.112009
Streaming k-means approximation · NIPS 2009
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning
0.112008
Privacy-preserving logistic regression · NIPS 2008
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure inference
secure logistic regression
0.112008
Privacy-preserving logistic regression · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
agnostic active learning
0.112007
A general agnostic active learning algorithm · NIPS 2007
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning
0.112007
A general agnostic active learning algorithm · NIPS 2007
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning › active data collection
stream-based active learning
0.112007
Practical Online Active Learning for Classification · CVPR 2007
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › VC theory
VC dimension
0.112007
A general agnostic active learning algorithm · NIPS 2007
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
prediction with expert advice
0.012003
Online Learning of Non-stationary Sequences · NIPS 2003
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.012009
Streaming k-means approximation · NIPS 2009
Image and video processing › document image analysis › character recognition
optical character recognition
0.012007
Practical Online Active Learning for Classification · CVPR 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online learning with experts · 0.3hidden markov model · 0.3weighted kernel k-means · 0.3uniform sampling · 0.3nyström approximation · 0.3empirical risk minimization · 0.2differential privacy · 0.2inverted index hierarchy · 0.2co-occurrence matrix similarity · 0.2streaming algorithms · 0.2k-means++ · 0.2hierarchical merging · 0.2random sampling · 0.1perceptron algorithm · 0.1active learning · 0.1sensitivity bounding · 0.1regularization · 0.1objective perturbation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Deep Clustering via Probabilistic Ratio-Cut Optimization
abstract
We propose a novel approach for optimizing the graph ratio-cut by modeling the binary assignments as random variables. We provide an upper bound on the expected ratio-cut, as well as an unbiased estimate of its gradient, to learn the parameters of the assignment variables in an online setting. The clustering resulting from our probabilistic approach (PRCut) outperforms the Rayleigh quotient relaxation of the combinatorial problem, its online learning extensions, and several widely used methods. We demonstrate that the PRCut clustering closely aligns with the similarity measure and can perform as well as a supervised classifier when label-based similarities are provided. This novel approach can leverage out-of-the-box self-supervised representations to achieve competitive performance and serve as an evaluation method for the quality of these representations.
Ayoub Ghriss, Claire Monteleoni
AISTATS2
2025 MixDiff: Mixing Natural and Synthetic Images for Robust Self-Supervised Representations
abstract
This paper introduces MixDiff, a new self-supervised learning (SSL) pre-training framework that combines real and synthetic images. Unlike traditional SSL methods that predominantly use real images, MixDiff uses a variant of Stable Diffusion to replace an augmented instance of a real image, facilitating the learning of cross real-synthetic image representations. Our key insight is that while models trained solely on synthetic images underperform, combining real and synthetic data leads to more robust and adaptable representations. Experiments show MixDiff enhances SimCLR, Barlow Twins, and DINO across various robustness datasets and domain transfer tasks, boosting Sim-CLR's ImageNet-1K accuracy by 4.56%. Our framework also demonstrates comparable performance without needing any augmentations, a surprising finding in SSL where augmentations are typically crucial. Furthermore, MixDiff achieves similar results to SimCLR while requiring less real data, highlighting its efficiency in representation learning11We have made the source code and generated data available to the public at https://github.com/cryptonymous9/mixing-ssl
Reza Akbarian Bafghi, Nidhin Harilal, Claire Monteleoni, Maziar Raissi
WACV3
2024 Position: Application-Driven Innovation in Machine Learning
abstract
In this position paper, we argue that application-driven research has been systemically under-valued in the machine learning community. As applications of machine learning proliferate, innovative algorithms inspired by specific real-world challenges have become increasingly important. Such work offers the potential for significant impact not merely in domains of application but also in machine learning itself. In this paper, we describe the paradigm of application-driven research in machine learning, contrasting it with the more standard paradigm of methods-driven research. We illustrate the benefits of application-driven machine learning and how this approach can productively synergize with methods-driven work. Despite these benefits, we find that reviewing, hiring, and teaching practices in machine learning often hold back application-driven innovation. We outline how these processes may be improved.
David Rolnick, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Sara Beery, Bistra Dilkina, Priya L. Donti, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Hannah Kerner, Claire Monteleoni, Esther Rolf, Milind Tambe
ICML8
2020 Cooperative Online Learning: Keeping your Neighbors Updated
abstract
We study an asynchronous online learning setting with a network of agents. At each time step, some of the agents are activated, requested to make a prediction, and pay the corresponding loss. The loss function is then revealed to these agents and also to their neighbors in the network. Our results characterize how much knowing the network structure affects the regret as a function of the model of agent activations. When activations are stochastic, the optimal regret (up to constant factors) is shown to be of order $\sqrt{\alpha T}$, where $T$ is the horizon and $\alpha$ is the independence number of the network. We prove that the upper bound is achieved even when agents have no information about the network structure. When activations are adversarial the situation changes dramatically: if agents ignore the network structure, a $\Omega(T)$ lower bound on the regret can be proven, showing that learning is impossible. However, when agents can choose to ignore some of their neighbors based on the knowledge of the network structure, we prove a $O(\sqrt{\overline{\chi} T})$ sublinear regret bound, where $\overline{\chi} \ge \alpha$ is the clique-covering number of the network.
Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, Tommaso Cesari, Claire Monteleoni
ALT3
2017 Convergence Rate of Stochastic k-means
abstract
We analyze online (Bottou & Bengio, 1994) and mini-batch (Sculley, 2010) k-means variants. Both scale up the widely used Lloyd’s algorithm via stochastic approximation, and have become popular for large-scale clustering and unsupervised feature learning. We show, for the first time, that they have global convergence towards “local optima” at rate $O(1/t)$ under general conditions. In addition, we show that if the dataset is clusterable, stochastic k-means with suitable initialization converges to an optimal k-means solution at rate $O(1/t)$ with high probability. The k-means objective is non-convex and non-differentiable; we exploit ideas from non-convex gradient-based optimization by providing a novel characterization of the trajectory of the k-means algorithm on its solution space, and circumvent its non-differentiability via geometric insights about the k-means update.
Claire Monteleoni
AISTATS2
2017 Beyond the Nystrom Approximation: Speeding up Spectral Clustering using Uniform Sampling and Weighted Kernel k-means
abstract
In this paper we present a framework for spectral clustering based on the following simple scheme: sample a subset of the input points, compute the clusters for the sampled subset using weighted kernel k-means (Dhillon et al. 2004) and use the resulting centers to compute a clustering for the remaining data points. For the case where the points are sampled uniformly at random without replacement, we show that the number of samples required depends mainly on the number of clusters and the diameter of the set of points in the kernel space. Experiments show that the proposed framework outperforms the approaches based on the Nystrom approximation both in terms of accuracy and computation time.
Mahesh Mohan, Claire Monteleoni
IJCAI2
2017 Exploiting sparsity to improve the accuracy of Nyström-based large-scale spectral clustering
abstract
The Nyström method is a matrix approximation technique that has shown great promise in speeding up spectral clustering. However, when the input matrix is sparse, we show that the traditional Nyström method requires a prohibitively large number of samples to obtain a good approximation. We propose a novel sampling approach to select the landmark points used to compute the Nyström approximation. We show that the proposed sampling approach obeys the same error bound as in Bouneffouf and Birol (2015). To control sample complexity, we propose a selective densification step based on breadth-first traversal. We show that the proposed densification does not change the optimal clustering. Results on real world datasets show that by combining the proposed sampling and densification schemes, we can obtain better accuracy compared to other techniques used for the Nyström method while using significantly fewer samples.
Mahesh Mohan, Claire Monteleoni
IJCNN2
2016 On Lloyd's Algorithm: New Theoretical Insights for Clustering in Practice
abstract
We provide new analyses of Lloyd’s algorithm (1982), commonly known as the k-means clustering algorithm. Kumar and Kannan (2010) showed that running k-SVD followed by a constant approximation k-means algorithm, and then Lloyd’s algorithm, will correctly cluster nearly all of the dataset with respect to the optimal clustering, provided the dataset satisfies a deterministic clusterability assumption. This method is viewed as the "Swiss Army knife" for clustering problems, subsuming popular generative models such as Gaussian mixtures. However, it is tailored to high dimensional data, i.e., when d ≫k . We analyze Lloyd’s algorithm for general d without using the spectral projection, which leads to a weaker assumption in the case d < k. Surprisingly, we show that a simple and scalable heuristic that combines random sampling with Single-Linkage serves as a good seeding algorithm for Lloyd’s algorithm under this assumption. We then study stopping criteria for Lloyd’s algorithm under the lens of clusterability, accompanied by controlled simulations.
Claire Monteleoni
AISTATS2
2016 Differentially-private learning of low dimensional manifolds
Anna Choromanska, Krzysztof Choromanski, Geetha Jagannathan, Claire Monteleoni
Theor. Comput. Sci.4
2015 Environment selection and hierarchical place recognition
abstract
As robots continue to create long-term maps, the amount of information that they need to handle increases over time. In terms of place recognition, this implies that the number of images being considered may increase until exceeding the computational resources of the robot. In this paper we consider a scenario where, given multiple independent large maps, possibly from different cities or locations, a robot must effectively and in real time decide whether it can localize itself in one of those known maps. Since the number of images to be handled by such a system is likely to be extremely large, we find that it is beneficial to decompose the set of images into independent groups or environments. This raises a new question: Given a query image, how do we select the best environment? This paper proposes a similarity criterion that can be used to solve this problem. It is based on the observation that, if each environment is described in terms of its co-occurrent features, similarity between environments can be established by comparing their co-occurrence matrices. We show that this leads to a novel place recognition algorithm that divides the collection of images into environments and arranges them in a hierarchy of inverted indices. By selecting first the relevant environment for the operating robot, we can reduce the number of images to perform the actual loop detection, reducing the execution time while preserving the accuracy. The practicality of this approach is shown through experimental results on several large datasets covering a combined distance of more than 750Km.
Mahesh Mohan, Dorian Gálvez-López, Claire Monteleoni, Gabe Sibley
ICRA3
2013 Differentially-Private Learning of Low Dimensional Manifolds
Anna Choromanska, Krzysztof Choromanski, Geetha Jagannathan, Claire Monteleoni
ALT4
2013 Fast Spectral Clustering via the Nyström Method
Anna Choromanska, Tony Jebara, Hyungtae Kim, Mahesh Mohan, Claire Monteleoni
ALT5
2012 Global Climate Model Tracking Using Geospatial Neighborhoods
abstract
A key problem in climate science is how to combine the predictions of the multi-model ensemble of global climate models. Recent work in machine learning (Monteleoni et al. 2011) showed the promise of an algorithm for online learning with experts for this task.We extend the Tracking Climate Models (TCM) approach to (1) take into account climate model predictions at higher spatial resolutions and (2) to model geospatial neighborhood influence between regions. Our algorithm enables neighborhood influence by modifying the transition dynamics of the Hidden Markov Model used by TCM, allowing the performance of spatial neighbors to influence the temporal switching probabilities for the best expert (climate model) at a given location. In experiments on historical data at a variety of spatial resolutions, our algorithm demonstrates improvements over TCM, when tracking global temperature anomalies.
Scott McQuade, Claire Monteleoni
AAAI2
2011 Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization
Kamalika Chaudhuri, Claire Monteleoni, Anand D. Sarwate
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2009 Streaming k-means approximation
abstract
We provide a clustering algorithm that approximately optimizes the k-means objective, in the one-pass streaming setting. We make no assumptions about the data, and our algorithm is very light-weight in terms of memory, and computation. This setting is applicable to unsupervised learning on massive data sets, or resource-constrained devices. The two main ingredients of our theoretical work are: a derivation of an extremely simple pseudo-approximation batch algorithm for k-means, in which the algorithm is allowed to output more than k centers (based on the recent k-means++"), and a streaming clustering algorithm in which batch clustering algorithms are performed on small inputs (fitting in memory) and combined in a hierarchical manner. Empirical evaluations on real and simulated data reveal the practical utility of our method."
Nir Ailon, Ragesh Jaiswal, Claire Monteleoni
NIPS3
2009 Analysis of Perceptron-Based Active Learning
Sanjoy Dasgupta, Adam Tauman Kalai, Claire Monteleoni
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2008 Privacy-preserving logistic regression
abstract
This paper addresses the important tradeoff between privacy and learnability, when designing algorithms for learning from private databases. First we apply an idea of Dwork et al. to design a specific privacy-preserving machine learning algorithm, logistic regression. This involves bounding the sensitivity of logistic regression, and perturbing the learned classifier with noise proportional to the sensitivity. Noting that the approach of Dwork et al. has limitations when applied to other machine learning algorithms, we then present another privacy-preserving logistic regression algorithm. The algorithm is based on solving a perturbed objective, and does not depend on the sensitivity. We prove that our algorithm preserves privacy in the model due to Dwork et al., and we provide a learning performance guarantee. Our work also reveals an interesting connection between regularization and privacy.
Kamalika Chaudhuri, Claire Monteleoni
NIPS2
2007 Practical Online Active Learning for Classification
abstract
We compare the practical performance of several recently proposed algorithms for active learning in the online classification setting. We consider two active learning algorithms (and their combined variants) that are strongly online, in that they access the data sequentially and do not store any previously labeled examples, and for which formal guarantees have recently been proven under various assumptions. We motivate an optical character recognition (OCR) application that we argue to be appropriately served by online active learning. We compare the practical efficacy, for this application, of the algorithm variants, and show significant reductions in label-complexity over random sampling.
Claire Monteleoni, Matti Kääriäinen
CVPR1
2007 A general agnostic active learning algorithm
abstract
We present an agnostic active learning algorithm for any hypothesis class of bounded VC dimension under arbitrary data distributions. Most previ- ous work on active learning either makes strong distributional assumptions, or else is computationally prohibitive. Our algorithm extends the simple scheme of Cohn, Atlas, and Ladner [1] to the agnostic setting, using re- ductions to supervised learning that harness generalization bounds in a simple but subtle manner. We provide a fall-back guarantee that bounds the algorithm’s label complexity by the agnostic PAC sample complexity. Our analysis yields asymptotic label complexity improvements for certain hypothesis classes and distributions. We also demonstrate improvements experimentally.
Sanjoy Dasgupta, Daniel Hsu 0001, Claire Monteleoni
NIPS3
2006 Efficient Algorithms for General Active Learning
Claire Monteleoni
COLT1
2005 Analysis of Perceptron-Based Active Learning
Sanjoy Dasgupta, Adam Tauman Kalai, Claire Monteleoni
COLT3
2003 Online Learning of Non-stationary Sequences
abstract
We consider an online learning scenario in which the learner can make predictions on the basis of a fixed set of experts. We derive upper and lower relative loss bounds for a class of universal learning algorithms in- volving a switching dynamics over the choice of the experts. On the basis of the performance bounds we provide the optimal a priori discretiza- tion for learning the parameter that governs the switching dynamics. We demonstrate the new algorithm in the context of wireless networks.
Claire Monteleoni, Tommi S. Jaakkola
NIPS1