Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David R. Pauluzzi

dblp:12/10713 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › signal processing for communications
signal parameter estimation
0.012000
A comparison of SNR estimation techniques for the AWGN channel · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2000
Physical-layer communications › channel estimation › channel parameter estimation
SNR estimation
0.012000
A comparison of SNR estimation techniques for the AWGN channel · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2000
Physical-layer communications
modulation
0.012000
A comparison of SNR estimation techniques for the AWGN channel · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2000
Physical-layer communications › modulation
phase-shift keying
0.012000
A comparison of SNR estimation techniques for the AWGN channel · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cramer-rao bound · 0.0computer simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 A comparison of SNR estimation techniques for the AWGN channel
abstract
The performances of several signal-to noise ratio (SNR) estimation techniques reported in the literature are compared to identify the "best" estimator. The SNR estimators are investigated by the computer simulation of baseband binary phase-shift keying (PSK) signals in real additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) and baseband 8-PSK signals in complex AWGN. The mean square error is used as a measure of performance. In addition to comparing the relative performances, the absolute levels of performance are also established; the simulated performances are compared to a published Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) for real AWGN and a CRB for complex AWGN that is derived here. Some known estimator structures are modified to perform better on the channel of interest. Estimator structures for both real and complex channels are examined.
David R. Pauluzzi, Norman C. Beaulieu
IEEE Trans. Commun.1