The rapid proliferation of Generative AI (GenAI) into diverse, high-stakes domains necessitates robust and reproducible evaluation methods. However, practitioners often resort to ad-hoc, non-standardized scripts, as common metrics are often unsuitable for specialized, structured outputs (e.g., automated plans, time-series) or holistic comparison across modalities (e.g., text, audio, and image). This fragmentation hinders comparability and slows AI system development. To address this challenge, we present GAICo (Generative AI Comparator): a deployed, open-source Python library that streamlines and standardizes GenAI output comparison. GAICo provides a unified, extensible framework supporting a comprehensive suite of reference-based metrics for unstructured text, specialized structured data formats, and multimedia (images, audio). Its architecture features a high-level API for rapid, end-to-end analysis, from multi-model comparison to visualization and reporting, alongside direct metric access for granular control. We demonstrate GAICo's utility through a detailed case study evaluating and debugging complex, multi-modal AI Travel Assistant pipelines. GAICo empowers AI researchers and developers to efficiently assess system performance, make evaluation reproducible, improve development velocity, and ultimately build more trustworthy AI systems, aligning with the goal of moving faster and safer in AI deployment. Since its release on PyPI in Jun 2025, the tool has been downloaded over 16K times, across versions, by Dec 2025, demonstrating growing community interest.

The rapid evolution of Generative AI, yielding outputs across text, structured data, images, and audio, has outpaced the development of standardized evaluation tools, leading to fragmented and non-reproducible practices. GAICo (Generative AI Comparator) offers a solution: a deployed, open-source Python library that provides a unified, extensible, and reproducible framework for multi-modal GenAI evaluation. Our demonstration highlights GAICo’s utility through a practical case study: evaluating and debugging composite AI Travel Assistant pipelines. We show how GAICo facilitates isolating performance issues, for instance, distinguishing orchestrator LLM planning deficiencies from specialist image model generation flaws, by consistently comparing diverse outputs against tailored references. This framework streamlines development, improves system reliability, and promotes reproducible evaluation, making it a critical tool for building safer and more effective AI. Its rapid adoption, evidenced by over 16,000 downloads in the first 6 months, underscores its relevance and impact within the AI community.

In this student paper, we report on our project to enhance road safety in South Carolina (SC) by analyzing traffic data provided by the Department of Transportation and evaluating the impact of a school-level student driver education program called Alive@25. We improve the understanding of road safety using these traffic and training data to understand collision patterns and areas for improvement and assess training coverage gaps. Our approach combines geospatial analysis, economic impact assessment, temporal trend analysis, and interactive visualizations while leveraging AI techniques to clean and analyze extensive datasets. Key findings revealed higher collision rates in urban counties and rising collision rates in mostly rural areas, where Alive@25 participation is declining. These insights led to recommendations for improving road infrastructure and expanding safety training programs. This research demonstrates the potential of AI-driven insights to inform timely, cost-effective interventions and promote multi-stakeholder engagement in addressing public safety challenges while teaching students data science and AI skills and civic engagement.

Tracking the rapidly evolving literature at the intersection of large language models (LLMs) and planning has become increasingly complex due to significant growth in research output and shifting thematic focuses. Building on an earlier survey, which organized 126 papers collected till November 2023 into eight categories, we present a platform that automates the extraction, categorization, and trend analysis of new papers. Our analysis reports on category drift, identifying evolving perspectives on the use of LLMs for planning. Our analysis reveals a decline in the percentage of papers for six categories, an increase in two, and the emergence of two new categories. Specifically, we contribute by (1) developing an automated system for categorizing new papers into existing or emergent categories, (2) reporting on category shifts with the addition of 47 new papers till September 2024, and (3) introducing a platform for continuous extraction, categorization, and trend tracking in LLM and planning research. This platform also features a leaderboard to encourage innovations in automated paper categorization.