Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ramin Yasdi

dblp:12/3071 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 87% Data models and query languages · 13%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge acquisition
0.011991
Learning Classification Rules from Database in the Context of Knowledge Acquisition and Representation · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1991
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › rule learning
classification rule learning
0.011991
Learning Classification Rules from Database in the Context of Knowledge Acquisition and Representation · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1991
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
rule learning
0.011991
Learning Classification Rules from Database in the Context of Knowledge Acquisition and Representation · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1991
Requirements engineering and software design › database design
conceptual schema design
0.011988
An Expert System for Conceptual Schema Design: A Machine Learning Approach · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1988
Data models and query languages › conceptual modeling
conceptual schema
0.011991
Learning Classification Rules from Database in the Context of Knowledge Acquisition and Representation · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1991
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
expert systems
0.011988
An Expert System for Conceptual Schema Design: A Machine Learning Approach · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rough set theory · 0.0inductive learning · 0.0machine learning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 A Literature Survey on Applications of Neural Networks for Human-Computer Interaction
Ramin Yasdi
Neural Comput. Appl.1
1999 Prediction of Road Traffic using a Neural Network Approach
Ramin Yasdi
Neural Comput. Appl.1
1995 Combining Rough Sets Learning- and Neural Learning-method to deal with uncertain and imprecise information
Ramin Yasdi
Neurocomputing1
1991 Learning Classification Rules from Database in the Context of Knowledge Acquisition and Representation
abstract
A method for learning knowledge from a database is used to address the bottleneck of manual knowledge acquisition. An attempt is made to improve representation with the assistance of experts and from computer resident knowledge. The knowledge representation is described in the framework of a conceptual schema consisting of a semantic model and an event model. A concept classifies a domain into different subdomains. As a method of knowledge acquisition, inductive learning techniques are used for rule generation. The theory of rough sets is used in designing the learning algorithm. Examples of certain concepts are used to induce general specifications of the concepts called classification rules. The basic approach is to partition the information into equivalence classes and to derive conclusions based on equivalence relations. In a sense, what is involved is a data-reduction process, where the goal is to reduce a large database of information to a small number of rules describing the domain. This completely integrated approach includes user interface, semantics, constraints, representations of temporal events, induction, etc.>
Ramin Yasdi
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
1988 An Expert System for Conceptual Schema Design: A Machine Learning Approach
Ramin Yasdi, Wojciech Ziarko
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.1
1987 Conceptual Schema Design: A Machine Learning Approach
Ramin Yasdi, Wojciech Ziarko
ISMIS1
1985 A Conceptual Design Aid Environment for Expert-Database Systems
Ramin Yasdi
Data Knowl. Eng.1