Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christophe Jermann

dblp:12/3363 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-1383-3103ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Mathematical optimization · 33% Computational geometry · 30% Computational complexity · 24%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › constraint satisfaction
symmetry breaking
0.212015
Variable symmetry breaking in numerical constraint problems · Artif. Intell. 2015
Mathematical optimization
branch-and-prune
0.212014
A branch and prune algorithm for the computation of generalized aspects of parallel robots · Artif. Intell. 2014
Computational complexity
constraint satisfaction
0.212014
A branch and prune algorithm for the computation of generalized aspects of parallel robots · Artif. Intell. 2014
Algorithms and data structures
anytime algorithms
0.112009
Search Strategies for an Anytime Usage of the Branch and Prune Algorithm · IJCAI 2009
Geometric modeling and processing
3d reconstruction
0.012003
Scene Modeling Based on Constraint System Decomposition Techniques · ICCV 2003
Geometric modeling and processing
3d scene modeling
0.012003
Scene Modeling Based on Constraint System Decomposition Techniques · ICCV 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

branch-and-prune · 0.2interval analysis · 0.2search strategy · 0.1search strategies · 0.1r-methods · 0.0constraint system decomposition · 0.0GPDOF algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 On continuation methods for non-linear bi-objective optimization: towards a certified interval-based approach
Benjamin Martin 0003, Alexandre Goldsztejn, Laurent Granvilliers, Christophe Jermann
J. Glob. Optim.4
2015 Variable symmetry breaking in numerical constraint problems
Alexandre Goldsztejn, Christophe Jermann, Vicente Ruiz de Angulo, Carme Torras
Artif. Intell.2
2014 A branch and prune algorithm for the computation of generalized aspects of parallel robots
Stéphane Caro, Damien Chablat, Alexandre Goldsztejn, Daisuke Ishii, Christophe Jermann
Artif. Intell.5
2013 Constraint Based Computation of Periodic Orbits of Chaotic Dynamical Systems
Alexandre Goldsztejn, Laurent Granvilliers, Christophe Jermann
CP3
2012 A Branch and Prune Algorithm for the Computation of Generalized Aspects of Parallel Robots
Stéphane Caro, Damien Chablat, Alexandre Goldsztejn, Daisuke Ishii, Christophe Jermann
CP5
2011 Symmetry Breaking in Numeric Constraint Problems
Alexandre Goldsztejn, Christophe Jermann, Vicente Ruiz de Angulo, Carme Torras
CP2
2009 Search Strategies for an Anytime Usage of the Branch and Prune Algorithm
Raphaël Chenouard, Alexandre Goldsztejn, Christophe Jermann
IJCAI3
2003 Scene Modeling Based on Constraint System Decomposition Techniques
abstract
We present a new approach to 3D scene modeling based on geometric constraints. Contrary to the existing methods, we can quickly obtain 3D scene models that respect the given constraints exactly. Our system can describe a large variety of linear and nonlinear constraints in a flexible way. To deal with the constraints, we decided to exploit the properties of the GPDOF algorithm developed in the Constraint Programming community (Trombettoni, 1998). The approach is based on a dictionary of so-called r-methods, based on theorems of geometry, which can solve a subset of geometric constraints in a very efficient way. GPDOF is used to find, in polynomial-time, a reduced parameterization of a scene, and to decompose the equation system, induced by constraints, into a sequence of r-methods. We have validated our approach in reconstructing, from images, 3D models of buildings based on linear and quadratic geometric constraints.
Marta Wilczkowiak, Gilles Trombettoni, Christophe Jermann, Peter F. Sturm, Edmond Boyer
ICCV3
2003 Algorithms for Identifying Rigid Subsystems in Geometric Constraint Systems
Christophe Jermann, Bertrand Neveu, Gilles Trombettoni
IJCAI1
2000 A Constraint Programming Approach for Solving Rigid Geometric Systems
Christophe Jermann, Gilles Trombettoni, Bertrand Neveu, Michel Rueher
CP1