Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eerika Savia

dblp:12/3965 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 50% Information retrieval · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.112005
Combining eye movements and collaborative filtering for proactive information retrieval · SIGIR 2005
Information retrieval › relevance feedback
implicit relevance feedback
0.112005
Combining eye movements and collaborative filtering for proactive information retrieval · SIGIR 2005
Wearable and physiological sensing
eye tracking
0.012005
Combining eye movements and collaborative filtering for proactive information retrieval · SIGIR 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic latent variable model · 0.1markov chain monte carlo · 0.1hidden markov model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Fast dependent components for fMRI analysis
abstract
Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) can be used to find correlating projections of two datasets with co-occurring samples. Instead of correlation, we would typically want to find more general dependencies, measured by mutual information. Variants of CCA based on non-parametric estimation of mutual information have been proposed previously; they outperform traditional CCA for non-Gaussian data but require infeasible amounts of computation for already quite modest sample sizes. We introduce a novel variant that uses a semi parametric estimate leading to a considerably faster algorithm. We apply the method on searching for statistical dependencies between multi-sensory stimuli and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of brain activity- in contrast to using regression on either of them.
Eerika Savia, Arto Klami, Samuel Kaski
ICASSP1
2009 Two-Way Grouping by One-Way Topic Models
Eerika Savia, Kai Puolamäki, Samuel Kaski
IDA1
2009 Latent grouping models for user preference prediction
Eerika Savia, Kai Puolamäki, Samuel Kaski
Mach. Learn.1
2007 Functional elements and networks in fMRI
Jarkko Ylipaavalniemi, Eerika Savia, Ricardo Vigário, Samuel Kaski
ESANN2
2005 Combining eye movements and collaborative filtering for proactive information retrieval
abstract
We study a new task, proactive information retrieval by combining implicit relevance feedback and collaborative filtering. We have constructed a controlled experimental setting, a prototype application, in which the users try to find interesting scientific articles by browsing their titles. Implicit feedback is inferred from eye movement signals, with discriminative hidden Markov models estimated from existing data in which explicit relevance feedback is available. Collaborative filtering is carried out using the User Rating Profile model, a state-of-the-art probabilistic latent variable model, computed using Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. For new document titles the prediction accuracy with eye movements, collaborative filtering, and their combination was significantly better than by chance. The best prediction accuracy still leaves room for improvement but shows that proactive information retrieval and combination of many sources of relevance feedback is feasible.
Kai Puolamäki, Jarkko Salojärvi, Eerika Savia, Jaana Simola, Samuel Kaski
SIGIR3
2005 Two-Way Latent Grouping Model for User Preference Prediction
Eerika Savia, Kai Puolamäki, Janne Sinkkonen, Samuel Kaski
UAI1
2005 Exploratory modeling of yeast stress response and its regulation with gcca and associative clustering
abstract
We model dependencies between m multivariate continuous-valued information sources by a combination of (i) a generalized canonical correlations analysis (gCCA) to reduce dimensionality while preserving dependencies in m - 1 of them, and (ii) summarizing dependencies with the remaining one by associative clustering. This new combination of methods avoids multiway associative clustering which would require a multiway contingency table and hence suffer from curse of dimensionality of the table. The method is applied to summarizing properties of yeast stress by searching for dependencies (commonalities) between expression of genes of baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in various stressful treatments, and summarizing stress regulation by finally adding data about transcription factor binding sites.
Janne Nikkilä, Christophe Roos, Eerika Savia, Samuel Kaski
Int. J. Neural Syst.3
2004 On text-based estimation of document relevance
abstract
This work is part of a proactive information retrieval project that aims at estimating relevance from implicit user feedback. The noisy feedback signal needs to be complemented with all available information, and textual content is one of the natural sources. Here we take the first steps by investigating whether this source is at all useful in the challenging setting of estimating the relevance of a new document based on only few samples with known relevance. It turns out that even sophisticated unsupervised methods like multinomial PCA (or latent Dirichlet allocation) cannot help much. By contrast, feature extraction supervised by relevant auxiliary data may help.
Eerika Savia, Samuel Kaski, Ville H. Tuulos, Petri Myllymäki
IJCNN1