Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William Mee

dblp:12/7406 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › ranking › text ranking
semantic ranking
0.222011
SkylineSearch: semantic ranking and result visualization for pubmed · SIGMOD Conference 2011
Semantic ranking and result visualization for life sciences publications · ICDE 2010
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval › biomedical information retrieval
biomedical literature search
0.112011
SkylineSearch: semantic ranking and result visualization for pubmed · SIGMOD Conference 2011
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.112011
SkylineSearch: semantic ranking and result visualization for pubmed · SIGMOD Conference 2011
Information retrieval
search engines
0.112011
SkylineSearch: semantic ranking and result visualization for pubmed · SIGMOD Conference 2011
Information retrieval
ranking
0.112010
Semantic ranking and result visualization for life sciences publications · ICDE 2010
Information retrieval › search interfaces
search result visualization
0.112010
Semantic ranking and result visualization for life sciences publications · ICDE 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

skyline computation · 0.2adaptive ranking · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 SkylineSearch: semantic ranking and result visualization for pubmed
abstract
Life sciences researchers perform scientific literature search as part of their daily activities. Many such searches are executed against PubMed, a central repository of life sciences articles, and often return hundreds, or even thousands, of results, pointing to the need for data exploration tools. In this demonstration we present SkylineSearch, a semantic ranking and result visualization system designed specifically for PubMed, and available to the scientific community at skyline.cs.columbia.edu. Our system leverages semantic annotations of articles with terms from the MeSH controlled vocabulary, and presents results as a two-dimensional skyline, plotting relevance against publication date. We demonstrate that SkylineSearch supports a richer data exploration experience than does the search functionality of PubMed, allowing users to find relevant references more easily. We also show that SkylineSearch executes queries and presents results in interactive time.
Julia Stoyanovich, Mayur Lodha, William Mee, Kenneth A. Ross
SIGMOD Conference3
2010 Semantic ranking and result visualization for life sciences publications
abstract
An ever-increasing amount of data and semantic knowledge in the domain of life sciences is bringing about new data management challenges. In this paper we focus on adding the semantic dimension to literature search, a central task in scientific research. We focus our attention on PubMed, the most significant bibliographic source in life sciences, and explore ways to use high-quality semantic annotations from the MeSH vocabulary to rank search results. We start by developing several families of ranking functions that relate a search query to a document's annotations. We then propose an efficient adaptive ranking mechanism for each of the families. We also describe a two-dimensional Skyline-based visualization that can be used in conjunction with the ranking to further improve the user's interaction with the system, and demonstrate how such Skylines can be computed adaptively and efficiently. Finally, we evaluate the effectiveness of our ranking with a user study.
Julia Stoyanovich, William Mee, Kenneth A. Ross
ICDE2
2009 Cache-conscious buffering for database operators with state
abstract
Database processes must be cache-efficient to effectively utilize modern hardware. In this paper, we analyze the importance of temporal locality and the resultant cache behavior in scheduling database operators for in-memory, block oriented query processing. We demonstrate how the overall performance of a workload of multiple database operators is strongly dependent on how they are interleaved with each other. Longer time slices combined with temporal locality within an operator amortize the effects of the initial compulsory cache misses needed to load the operator's state, such as a hash table, into the cache. Though running an operator to completion over all of its input results in the greatest amortization of cache misses, this is typically infeasible because of the large intermediate storage requirement to materialize all input tuples to an operator. We show experimentally that good cache performance can be obtained with smaller buffers whose size is determined at runtime. We demonstrate a low-overhead method of runtime cache miss sampling using hardware performance counters. Our evaluation considers two common database operators with state: aggregation and hash join. Sampling reveals operator temporal locality and cache miss behavior, and we use those characteristics to choose an appropriate input buffer/block size. The calculated buffer size balances cache miss amortization with buffer memory requirements.
John Cieslewicz, William Mee, Kenneth A. Ross
DaMoN2