Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wael A. Hashlamoun

dblp:12/8098 · also Wael Abdel-Mohsen Hashlamoun · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
8as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 67% Internet of things and sensor networks · 33%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Learning theory · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network › distributed algorithms for sensor networks
distributed detection
0.011996
Near-optimum quantization for signal detection · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1996
Physical-layer communications › signal processing for communications › quantization
quantizer design
0.011996
Near-optimum quantization for signal detection · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1996
Physical-layer communications
signal detection
0.011996
Near-optimum quantization for signal detection · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1996
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
bayesian decision theory
0.011994
A Tight Upper Bound on the Bayesian Probability of Error · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1994
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
error probability bounds
0.011994
A Tight Upper Bound on the Bayesian Probability of Error · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1994
Information theory › statistical inference › distributed inference
distributed detection
0.011993
Further results on distributed Bayesian signal detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

upper bound minimization · 0.0heuristic optimization · 0.0bhattacharyya bound · 0.0optimization algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Distributed Detection with Multiple Sensors in the Presence of Sybil Attacks
abstract
This paper considers the problem of distributed detection in the presence of a Sybil attack where a malicious sensor node can send multiple falsified decisions using multiple fake identities to a Fusion Center (FC) to degrade its decision-making performance. We study the problem under the Neyman-Pearson (NP) setup. We find that, due to the Sybil attack, the decisions received at the FC become correlated and that the degree of correlation is dependent on the number of fake identities used. The paper characterizes the optimal Sybil attack that blinds the FC, i.e., makes the FC incapable of making an informed decision. We find that if the sum of the local detection and false alarm probabilities of the sensor nodes is 1, the FC can be made blind when at least 50% of the decisions are sent using fake identities. However, if this condition is not met, then all decisions would have to be sent using fake identities in order to blind the FC. The paper also investigates strategic interactions between the FC and the Sybil attacker using Game Theory and proves the existence of a Nash Equilibrium (NE). Numerical results are presented to gain important insights.
Wael A. Hashlamoun, Swastik Brahma, Pramod K. Varshney
GLOBECOM1
1998 A unified framework for evaluating bounds on the Bayesian cost
Wael A. Hashlamoun, Wasfi S. Kafri
Signal Process.1
1997 Bounds on the Bayesian cost in optimum receivers
Wael A. Hashlamoun
Signal Process.1
1996 Near-optimum quantization for signal detection
abstract
A heuristic approach to design quantizers for signal detection is presented. Quantizer parameters are obtained that minimize a tight upper bound on the probability of error. This approach is applied to the design of distributed detection systems. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate its near-optimum performance.
Wael A. Hashlamoun, Pramod K. Varshney
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
1994 A Tight Upper Bound on the Bayesian Probability of Error
abstract
In this paper, we present a new upper bound on the minimum probability of error of Bayesian decision systems for statistical pattern recognition. This new bound is continuous everywhere and is shown to be tighter than several existing bounds such as the Bhattacharyya and the Bayesian bounds. Numerical results are also presented.>
Wael A. Hashlamoun, Pramod K. Varshney, V. N. S. Samarasooriya
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1993 Further results on distributed Bayesian signal detection
abstract
The problem of distributed Bayesian signal detection is addressed. The problem is reformulated and a new design approach is presented that allows the use of efficient optimization algorithms.>
Wael A. Hashlamoun, Pramod K. Varshney
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1991 An approach to the design of distributed Bayesian detection structures
abstract
A computationally efficient approach to the design of decentralized Bayesian detection systems is presented. This procedure is based on an alternate representation of the minimum average cost in terms of a modified form of the Kolmogorov variational distance. The utility of the approach is demonstrated by applying it to the design and performance evaluation of three decentralized detection structures. In all these structures, the design of the optimum systems reduces to the optimization of a single function of a certain number of variables. Numerical examples are presented for illustration.>
Wael A. Hashlamoun, Pramod K. Varshney
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.1
1989 Performance aspects of decentralized detection structures
abstract
Performance aspects of minimum probability of error decentralized detection systems are considered. The relationship between the probability of error of a maximum a posteriori probability receiver and the Kolmogorov variational distance is derived. This relationship is used to derive the minimum probability of error for an n-sensor decentralized system in terms of the sensor decisions. A design procedure is presented that results in the optimum global minimum probability of error. The design of three suboptimum systems based on the Bharttacharyya distance, Kullback discrimination, and optimization of the probability of error at the local level is described. A numerical example comparing the performance of the optimum system to the performance of the suboptimum systems is also included.>
Wael A. Hashlamoun, Pramod K. Varshney
SMC1