Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Julien Kloetzer
dblp:12/8826
· DBLP profile ↗
17ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 17 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
14 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 36% Language models and text generation · 21% Question answering and dialogue systems · 18% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 25 heaviest of 28, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
why-question answering |
1.6 | 5 | 2019 | Open-Domain Why-Question Answering with Adversarial Learning to Encode Answer Texts · ACL (1) 2019 Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why Questions · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | BERTAC: Enhancing Transformer-based Language Models with Adversarially Pretrained Convolutional Neural Networks · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 Open-Domain Why-Question Answering with Adversarial Learning to Encode Answer Texts · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why Questions · AAAI 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why Questions · AAAI 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis › event causality identification
causality detection |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Event Causality Recognition Exploiting Multiple Annotators' Judgments and Background Knowledge · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 Improving Event Causality Recognition with Multiple Background Knowledge Sources Using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks · AAAI 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction › event relation extraction
causal relation extraction |
0.7 | 3 | 2019 | Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks with Causality-Attention for Why-Question Answering · WSDM 2017 A Semi-Supervised Learning Approach to Why-Question Answering · AAAI 2016 Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › language model architecture
transformer language model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | BERTAC: Enhancing Transformer-based Language Models with Adversarially Pretrained Convolutional Neural Networks · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016 Intra-sentential Zero Anaphora Resolution using Subject Sharing Recognition · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › coreference resolution › anaphora resolution
zero anaphora resolution |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016 Intra-sentential Zero Anaphora Resolution using Subject Sharing Recognition · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.3 | 3 | 2015 | Intra-sentential Zero Anaphora Resolution using Subject Sharing Recognition · EMNLP 2015 Generating Event Causality Hypotheses through Semantic Relations · AAAI 2015 Toward Future Scenario Generation: Extracting Event Causality Exploiting Semantic Relation, Context, and Association Features · ACL (1) 2014 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › passage retrieval
answer passage retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks with Causality-Attention for Why-Question Answering · WSDM 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A Semi-Supervised Learning Approach to Why-Question Answering · AAAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data-centric deep learning
training data generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A Semi-Supervised Learning Approach to Why-Question Answering · AAAI 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
event causality |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Generating Event Causality Hypotheses through Semantic Relations · AAAI 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics
lexical substitution |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Large-Scale Acquisition of Entailment Pattern Pairs by Exploiting Transitivity · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis
event causality identification |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Toward Future Scenario Generation: Extracting Event Causality Exploiting Semantic Relation, Context, and Association Features · ACL (1) 2014 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.2 | 2 | 2017 | Improving Event Causality Recognition with Multiple Background Knowledge Sources Using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks · AAAI 2017 Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network › convolutional neural network architecture
multi-column convolutional neural network |
0.2 | 2 | 2017 | Improving Event Causality Recognition with Multiple Background Knowledge Sources Using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks · AAAI 2017 Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge incorporation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Event Causality Recognition Exploiting Multiple Annotators' Judgments and Background Knowledge · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Information retrieval › question answering
open-domain question answering |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Open-Domain Why-Question Answering with Adversarial Learning to Encode Answer Texts · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse processing
centering theory |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
discourse analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Intra-sentential Zero Anaphora Resolution using Subject Sharing Recognition · EMNLP 2015 |
Mathematical optimization
integer programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Intra-sentential Zero Anaphora Resolution using Subject Sharing Recognition · EMNLP 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
convolutional neural network · 1.5adversarial network · 0.8BERT · 0.8causality recognition · 0.6multi-column convolutional neural network · 0.5adversarial pretraining · 0.5recurrent neural network · 0.4encoder-decoder · 0.4annotation aggregation · 0.4distant supervision · 0.3attention mechanism · 0.3subject sharing recognizer · 0.2integer linear programming · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | BERTAC: Enhancing Transformer-based Language Models with Adversarially Pretrained Convolutional Neural NetworksabstractJong-Hoon Oh, Ryu Iida, Julien Kloetzer, Kentaro Torisawa. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Jong-Hoon Oh, Ryu Iida, Julien Kloetzer, Kentaro Torisawa |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 3 |
| 2020 | Understanding User Utterances in a Dialog System for CaregivingabstractA dialog system that can monitor the health status of seniors has a huge potential for solving the labor force shortage in the caregiving industry in aging societies. As a part of efforts to create such a system, we are developing two modules that are aimed to correctly interpret user utterances: (i) a yes/no response classifier, which categorizes responses to health-related yes/no questions that the system asks; and (ii) an entailment recognizer, which detects users’ voluntary mentions about their health status. To apply machine learning approaches to the development of the modules, we created large annotated datasets of 280,467 question-response pairs and 38,868 voluntary utterances. For question-response pairs, we asked annotators to avoid direct “yes” or “no” answers, so that our data could cover a wide range of possible natural language responses. The two modules were implemented by fine-tuning a BERT model, which is a recent successful neural network model. For the yes/no response classifier, the macro-average of the average precisions (APs) over all of our four categories (Yes/No/Unknown/Other) was 82.6% (96.3% for “yes” responses and 91.8% for “no” responses), while for the entailment recognizer it was 89.9%. Yoshihiko Asao, Julien Kloetzer, Junta Mizuno, Dai Saiki, Kazuma Kadowaki, Kentaro Torisawa |
LREC | 2 |
| 2019 | Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-QuestionsabstractThis paper proposes a novel method for generating compact answers to open-domain why-questions, such as the following answer, “Because deep learning technologies were introduced,” to the question, “Why did Google’s machine translation service improve so drastically?” Although many works have dealt with why-question answering, most have focused on retrieving as answers relatively long text passages that consist of several sentences. Because of their length, such passages are not appropriate to be read aloud by spoken dialog systems and smart speakers; hence, we need to create a method that generates compact answers. We developed a novel neural summarizer for this compact answer generation task. It combines a recurrent neural network-based encoderdecoder model with stacked convolutional neural networks and was designed to effectively exploit background knowledge, in this case a set of causal relations (e.g., “[Microsoft’s machine translation has made great progress over the last few years]effect since [it started to use deep learning.]cause”) that was extracted from a large web data archive (4 billion web pages). Our experimental results show that our method achieved significantly better ROUGE F-scores than existing encoder-decoder models and their variations that were augmented with query-attention and memory networks, which are used to exploit the background knowledge. Ryu Iida, Canasai Kruengkrai, Ryo Ishida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Julien Kloetzer |
AAAI | 6 |
| 2019 | Open-Domain Why-Question Answering with Adversarial Learning to Encode Answer TextsabstractIn this paper, we propose a method for whyquestion answering (why-QA) that uses an adversarial learning framework.Existing why-QA methods retrieve answer passages that usually consist of several sentences.These multi-sentence passages contain not only the reason sought by a why-question and its connection to the why-question, but also redundant and/or unrelated parts.We use our proposed Adversarial networks for Generating compact-answer Representation (AGR) to generate from a passage a vector representation of the non-redundant reason sought by a why-question and exploit the representation for judging whether the passage actually answers the why-question.Through a series of experiments using Japanese why-QA datasets, we show that these representations improve the performance of our why-QA neural model as well as that of a BERT-based why-QA model.We show that they also improve a state-of-the-art distantly supervised open-domain QA (DS-QA) method on publicly available English datasets, even though the target task is not a why-QA. Jong-Hoon Oh, Kazuma Kadowaki, Julien Kloetzer, Ryu Iida, Kentaro Torisawa |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2019 | Event Causality Recognition Exploiting Multiple Annotators' Judgments and Background KnowledgeabstractKazuma Kadowaki, Ryu Iida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Julien Kloetzer. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Kazuma Kadowaki, Ryu Iida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Julien Kloetzer |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 5 |
| 2018 | Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why QuestionsabstractThis paper proposes a neural network-based method for generating compact answers to open-domain why-questions (e.g., "Why was Mr. Trump elected as the president of the US?"). Unlike factoid question answering methods that provide short text spans as answers, existing work for why-question answering have aimed at answering questions by retrieving relatively long text passages, each of which often consists of several sentences, from a text archive. While the actual answer to a why-question may be expressed over several consecutive sentences, these often contain redundant and/or unrelated parts. Such answers would not be suitable for spoken dialog systems and smart speakers such as Amazon Echo, which receive much attention in these days. In this work, we aim at generating non-redundant compact answers to why-questions from answer passages retrieved from a very large web data corpora (4 billion web pages) by an already existing open-domain why-question answering system, using a novel neural network obtained by extending existing summarization methods. We also automatically generate training data using a large number of causal relations automatically extracted from 4 billion web pages by an existing supervised causality recognizer. The data is used to train our neural network, together with manually created training data. Through a series of experiments, we show that both our novel neural network and auto-generated training data improve the quality of the generated answers both in ROUGE score and in a subjective evaluation. Ryo Ishida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Ryu Iida, Canasai Kruengkrai, Julien Kloetzer |
AAAI | 6 |
| 2017 | Improving Event Causality Recognition with Multiple Background Knowledge Sources Using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural NetworksabstractWe propose a method for recognizing such event causalities as "smoke cigarettes" → "die of lung cancer" using background knowledge taken from web texts as well as original sentences from which candidates for the causalities were extracted. We retrieve texts related to our event causality candidates from four billion web pages by three distinct methods, including a why-question answering system, and feed them to our multi-column convolutional neural networks. This allows us to identify the useful background knowledge scattered in web texts and effectively exploit the identified knowledge to recognize event causalities. We empirically show that the combination of our neural network architecture and background knowledge significantly improves average precision, while the previous state-of-the-art method gains just a small benefit from such background knowledge. Canasai Kruengkrai, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Julien Kloetzer, Jong-Hoon Oh, Masahiro Tanaka |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2017 | Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks with Causality-Attention for Why-Question AnsweringabstractWhy-question answering (why-QA) is a task to retrieve answers (or answer passages) to why-questions (e.g., "why are tsunamis generated?") from a text archive. Several previously proposed methods for why-QA improved their performance by automatically recognizing causalities that are expressed with such explicit cues as "because" in answer passages and using the recognized causalities as a clue for finding proper answers. However, in answer passages, causalities might be implicitly expressed, (i.e., without any explicit cues): "An earthquake suddenly displaced sea water and a tsunami was generated." The previous works did not deal with such implicitly expressed causalities and failed to find proper answers that included the causalities. We improve why-QA based on the following two ideas. First, implicitly expressed causalities in one text might be expressed in other texts with explicit cues. If we can automatically recognize such explicitly expressed causalities from a text archive and use them to complement the implicitly expressed causalities in an answer passage, we can improve why-QA. Second, the causes of similar events tend to be described with a similar set of words (e.g., "seismic energy" and "tectonic plates" for "the Great East Japan Earthquake" and "the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake"). As such, even if we cannot find in a text archive any explicitly expressed cause of an event (e.g., "the Great East Japan Earthquake") expressed in a question (e.g., "Why did the Great East Japan earthquake happen?"), we might be able to identify its implicitly expressed causes with a set of words (e.g., "tectonic plates") that appear in the explicitly expressed cause of a similar event (e.g., "the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake"). Jong-Hoon Oh, Kentaro Torisawa, Canasai Kruengkrai, Ryu Iida, Julien Kloetzer |
WSDM | 5 |
| 2016 | A Semi-Supervised Learning Approach to Why-Question AnsweringabstractWe propose a semi-supervised learning method for improving why-question answering (why-QA). The key of our method is to generate training data (question-answer pairs) from causal relations in texts such as "[Tsunamis are generated](effect) because [the ocean's water mass is displaced by an earthquake](cause)." A naive method for the generation would be to make a question-answer pair by simply converting the effect part of the causal relations into a why-question, like "Why are tsunamis generated?" from the above example, and using the source text of the causal relations as an answer. However, in our preliminary experiments, this naive method actually failed to improve the why-QA performance. The main reason was that the machine-generated questions were often incomprehensible like "Why does (it) happen?", and that the system suffered from overfitting to the results of our automatic causality recognizer. Hence, we developed a novel method that effectively filters out incomprehensible questions and retrieves from texts answers that are likely to be paraphrases of a given causal relation. Through a series of experiments, we showed that our approach significantly improved the precision of the top answer by 8% over the current state-of-the-art system for Japanese why-QA. Jong-Hoon Oh, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Ryu Iida, Masahiro Tanaka, Julien Kloetzer |
AAAI | 6 |
| 2016 | Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural NetworkabstractThis paper proposes a method for intrasentential subject zero anaphora resolution in Japanese.Our proposed method utilizes a Multi-column Convolutional Neural Network (MCNN) for predicting zero anaphoric relations.Motivated by Centering Theory and other previous works, we exploit as clues both the surface word sequence and the dependency tree of a target sentence in our MCNN.Even though the F-score of our method was lower than that of the state-of-the-art method, which achieved relatively high recall and low precision, our method achieved much higher precision (>0.8) in a wide range of recall levels.We believe such high precision is crucial for real-world NLP applications and thus our method is preferable to the state-of-the-art method. Ryu Iida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Canasai Kruengkrai, Julien Kloetzer |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2015 | Generating Event Causality Hypotheses through Semantic RelationsabstractEvent causality knowledge is indispensable for intelligent natural language understanding. The problem is that any method for extracting event causalities from text is insufficient; it is likely that some event causalities that we can recognize in this world are not written in a corpus, no matter its size. We propose a method of hypothesizing unseen event causalities from known event causalities extracted from the web by the semantic relations between nouns. For example, our method can hypothesize "deploy a security camera" -> "avoid crimes" from "deploy a mosquito net" -> "avoid malaria" through semantic relation . Our experiments show that, from 2.4 million event causalities extracted from the web, our method generated more than 300,000 hypotheses, which were not in the input, with 70% precision. We also show that our method outperforms a state-of-the-art hypothesis generation method. Chikara Hashimoto, Kentaro Torisawa, Julien Kloetzer, Jong-Hoon Oh |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2015 | Intra-sentential Zero Anaphora Resolution using Subject Sharing RecognitionabstractIn this work, we improve the performance of intra-sentential zero anaphora resolution in Japanese using a novel method of recognizing subject sharing relations.In Japanese, a large portion of intrasentential zero anaphora can be regarded as subject sharing relations between predicates, that is, the subject of some predicate is also the unrealized subject of other predicates.We develop an accurate recognizer of subject sharing relations for pairs of predicates in a single sentence, and then construct a subject shared predicate network, which is a set of predicates that are linked by the subject sharing relations recognized by our recognizer.We finally combine our zero anaphora resolution method exploiting the subject shared predicate network and a state-ofthe-art ILP-based zero anaphora resolution method.Our combined method achieved a significant improvement over the the ILPbased method alone on intra-sentential zero anaphora resolution in Japanese.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to explicitly use an independent subject sharing recognizer in zero anaphora resolution. Ryu Iida, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Jong-Hoon Oh, Julien Kloetzer |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2015 | Large-Scale Acquisition of Entailment Pattern Pairs by Exploiting TransitivityabstractWe propose a novel method for acquiring entailment pairs of binary patterns on a large-scale.This method exploits the transitivity of entailment and a self-training scheme to improve the performance of an already strong supervised classifier for entailment, and unlike previous methods that exploit transitivity, it works on a largescale.With it we acquired 138.1 million pattern pairs with 70% precision with such non-trivial lexical substitution as "use Y to distribute X"→"X is available on Y" whose extraction is considered difficult.This represents 50.4 million more pattern pairs (a 57.5% increase) than what our supervised baseline extracted at the same precision. Julien Kloetzer, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Jong-Hoon Oh |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2015 | Recognizing Complex Negation on Twitter
Junta Mizuno, Canasai Kruengkrai, Kiyonori Ohtake, Chikara Hashimoto, Kentaro Torisawa, Julien Kloetzer, Kentaro Inui |
PACLIC | 6 |
| 2014 | Toward Future Scenario Generation: Extracting Event Causality Exploiting Semantic Relation, Context, and Association FeaturesabstractWe propose a supervised method of extracting event causalities like conduct slash-and-burn agriculture→exacerbate desertification from the web using se-mantic relation (between nouns), context, and association features. Experiments show that our method outperforms base-lines that are based on state-of-the-art methods. We also propose methods of generating future scenarios like conduct slash-and-burn agriculture→exacerbate desertification→increase Asian dust (from China)→asthma gets worse. Experi-ments show that we can generate 50,000 scenarios with 68 % precision. We also generated a scenario deforestation con-tinues→global warming worsens→sea temperatures rise→vibrio parahaemolyti-cus fouls (water), which is written in no document in our input web corpus crawled in 2007. But the vibrio risk due to global warming was observed in Baker-Austin et al. (2013). Thus, we “predicted ” the future event sequence in a sense. 1 Chikara Hashimoto, Kentaro Torisawa, Julien Kloetzer, Motoki Sano, István Varga, Jong-Hoon Oh, Yutaka Kidawara |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2014 | Million-scale Derivation of Semantic Relations from a Manually Constructed Predicate Taxonomy
Motoki Sano, Kentaro Torisawa, Julien Kloetzer, Chikara Hashimoto, István Varga, Jong-Hoon Oh |
COLING | 3 |
| 2013 | Two-Stage Method for Large-Scale Acquisition of Contradiction Pattern Pairs using EntailmentabstractJulien Kloetzer, Stijn De Saeger, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Jong-Hoon Oh, Motoki Sano, Kiyonori Ohtake. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2013. Julien Kloetzer, Stijn De Saeger, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Jong-Hoon Oh, Motoki Sano, Kiyonori Ohtake |
EMNLP | 1 |