Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amir Zait
dblp:12/9812
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% Language models and text generation · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ReCogLab: a framework testing relational reasoning & cognitive hypotheses on LLMs · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
relational reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ReCogLab: a framework testing relational reasoning & cognitive hypotheses on LLMs · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
generative benchmark construction · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ReCogLab: a framework testing relational reasoning & cognitive hypotheses on LLMsabstractA fundamental part of human cognition is the ability to not only recall previous memories, but also reason across them to draw conclusions. In cognitive science and psychology, this is termed relational reasoning and a number of effects and biases have been observed in human cognition. Designing experiments to measure these reasoning effects is effortful and does not transfer easily to analyzing language model reasoning patterns. To make exploring language models on relational reasoning easier, we introduce ReCogLab – a generative framework for constructing reasoning examples. Unlike static datasets, our framework has a number of benefits that help us in our goal of flexible evaluation of LLMs. First, our framework allows us to control the difficulty and context-length of the problem, allowing us to scale with model capability and evaluate LLMs at a variety of scales. Second, the ability to change the configuration of a dataset dynamically allows us to probe models on different aspects and capabilities. Finally, the flexibility of our approach enables the recreation of classic cognitive science experiments and the systematic study of relational reasoning biases in language models. We demonstrate several such experiments and present our findings on a wide variety of open and closed-source language models. We release all data and code at https://github.com/google-deepmind/recoglab. Henry Prior, Gargi Balasubramaniam, Rivka Moroshko, Amir Zait, Ilia Labzovsky, Danny Karmon, Ishita Dasgupta 0001, Kimberly L. Stachenfeld, Kenneth Marino |
ICLR | 5 |