Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Hailang Huang

dblp:120/1037 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-3382-435XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Reinforcement learning · 30% Generative modeling · 26% Language models and text generation · 15%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 54% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 46%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
curriculum reinforcement learning
1.012026
AdaCuRL: Adaptive Curriculum Reinforcement Learning with Invalid Sample Mitigation and Historical Revisiting · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning
1.012026
AdaCuRL: Adaptive Curriculum Reinforcement Learning with Invalid Sample Mitigation and Historical Revisiting · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning for NLP
reinforcement fine-tuning
1.012026
AdaCuRL: Adaptive Curriculum Reinforcement Learning with Invalid Sample Mitigation and Historical Revisiting · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
LD-RPS: Zero-Shot Unified Image Restoration via Latent Diffusion Recurrent Posterior Sampling · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
latent diffusion model
0.912025
LD-RPS: Zero-Shot Unified Image Restoration via Latent Diffusion Recurrent Posterior Sampling · ICCV 2025
Image and video processing › image restoration › multi-task image restoration
all-in-one image restoration
0.912025
LD-RPS: Zero-Shot Unified Image Restoration via Latent Diffusion Recurrent Posterior Sampling · ICCV 2025
Image and video processing
image restoration
0.912025
LD-RPS: Zero-Shot Unified Image Restoration via Latent Diffusion Recurrent Posterior Sampling · ICCV 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph reasoning
0.812024
Learning Multi-Granularity and Adaptive Representation for Knowledge Graph Reasoning · IJCAI 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › heterogeneous graph learning › heterogeneous graph representation learning
knowledge graph representation learning
0.812024
Learning Multi-Granularity and Adaptive Representation for Knowledge Graph Reasoning · IJCAI 2024
Information retrieval
cross-language information retrieval
0.812024
Improving the Consistency in Cross-Lingual Cross-Modal Retrieval with 1-to-K Contrastive Learning · KDD 2024
Information retrieval
cross-modal retrieval
0.812024
Improving the Consistency in Cross-Lingual Cross-Modal Retrieval with 1-to-K Contrastive Learning · KDD 2024
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
cross-modal retrieval
0.812024
Cross-Modal and Uni-Modal Soft-Label Alignment for Image-Text Retrieval · AAAI 2024
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › cross-modal retrieval
image-text retrieval
0.812024
Cross-Modal and Uni-Modal Soft-Label Alignment for Image-Text Retrieval · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.212024
Improving the Consistency in Cross-Lingual Cross-Modal Retrieval with 1-to-K Contrastive Learning · KDD 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

contrastive learning · 2.3posterior sampling · 1.7multimodal understanding model · 1.7latent diffusion model · 1.71-to-k contrastive learning · 1.5difficulty estimation · 1.0chain-of-thought · 1.0KL regularization · 1.0uni-modal pre-trained model · 0.8soft-label supervision · 0.8multi-granularity representation learning · 0.8adaptive representation learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 AdaCuRL: Adaptive Curriculum Reinforcement Learning with Invalid Sample Mitigation and Historical Revisiting
abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) has demonstrated considerable potential for enhancing reasoning in large language models (LLMs). However, existing methods suffer from Gradient Starvation and Policy Degradation when training directly on samples with mixed difficulty. To mitigate this, prior approaches leverage Chain-of-Thought (CoT) data, but the construction of high-quality CoT annotations remains labor-intensive. Alternatively, curriculum learning strategies have been explored but frequently encounter challenges, such as difficulty mismatch, reliance on manual curriculum design, and catastrophic forgetting. To address these issues, we propose AdaCuRL, a Adaptive Curriculum Reinforcement Learning framework that integrates coarse-to-fine difficulty estimation with adaptive curriculum scheduling. This approach dynamically aligns data difficulty with model capability and incorporates a data revisitation mechanism to mitigate catastrophic forgetting. Furthermore, AdaCuRL employs adaptive reference and sparse KL strategies to prevent Policy Degradation. Extensive experiments across diverse reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that AdaCuRL consistently achieves significant performance improvements on both LLMs and MLLMs.
Renda Li, Hailang Huang, Fei Wei, Xiangxiang Chu
AAAI2
2025 LD-RPS: Zero-Shot Unified Image Restoration via Latent Diffusion Recurrent Posterior Sampling
abstract
Unified image restoration is a significantly challenging task in low-level vision. Existing methods either make tailored designs for specific tasks, limiting their generalizability across various types of degradation, or rely on training with paired datasets, thereby suffering from closed-set constraints. To address these issues, we propose a novel, dataset-free, and unified approach through recurrent posterior sampling utilizing a pretrained latent diffusion model. Our method incorporates the multimodal understanding model to provide sematic priors for the generative model under a task-blind condition. Furthermore, it utilizes a lightweight module to align the degraded input with the generated preference of the diffusion model, and employs recurrent refinement for posterior sampling. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods, validating its effectiveness and robustness. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/AMAP-ML/LD-RPS.
Huaqiu Li, Tongwen Huang, Hailang Huang, Haoqian Wang, Xiangxiang Chu
ICCV4
2024 Cross-Modal and Uni-Modal Soft-Label Alignment for Image-Text Retrieval
abstract
Current image-text retrieval methods have demonstrated impressive performance in recent years. However, they still face two problems: the inter-modal matching missing problem and the intra-modal semantic loss problem. These problems can significantly affect the accuracy of image-text retrieval. To address these challenges, we propose a novel method called Cross-modal and Uni-modal Soft-label Alignment (CUSA). Our method leverages the power of uni-modal pre-trained models to provide soft-label supervision signals for the image-text retrieval model. Additionally, we introduce two alignment techniques, Cross-modal Soft-label Alignment (CSA) and Uni-modal Soft-label Alignment (USA), to overcome false negatives and enhance similarity recognition between uni-modal samples. Our method is designed to be plug-and-play, meaning it can be easily applied to existing image-text retrieval models without changing their original architectures. Extensive experiments on various image-text retrieval models and datasets, we demonstrate that our method can consistently improve the performance of image-text retrieval and achieve new state-of-the-art results. Furthermore, our method can also boost the uni-modal retrieval performance of image-text retrieval models, enabling it to achieve universal retrieval. The code and supplementary files can be found at https://github.com/lerogo/aaai24_itr_cusa.
Hailang Huang, Zhijie Nie, Ziyu Shang
AAAI1
2024 Learning Multi-Granularity and Adaptive Representation for Knowledge Graph Reasoning
Ziyu Shang, Peng Wang 0004, Wenjun Ke 0002, Jiajun Liu 0005, Hailang Huang, Chenxiao Wu, Jianghan Liu, Xiye Chen
IJCAI5
2024 Improving the Consistency in Cross-Lingual Cross-Modal Retrieval with 1-to-K Contrastive Learning
abstract
Cross-lingual Cross-modal Retrieval (CCR) is an essential task in web search, which aims to break the barriers between modality and language simultaneously and achieves image-text retrieval in the multi-lingual scenario with a single model. In recent years, excellent progress has been made based on cross-lingual cross-modal pre-training; particularly, the methods based on contrastive learning on large-scale data have significantly improved retrieval tasks. However, these methods directly follow the existing pre-training methods in the cross-lingual or cross-modal domain, leading to two problems of inconsistency in CCR: The methods with cross-lingual style suffer from the intra-modal error propagation, resulting in inconsistent recall performance across languages in the whole dataset. The methods with cross-modal style suffer from the inter-modal optimization direction bias, resulting in inconsistent rank across languages within each instance, which cannot be reflected by Recall@K. To solve these problems, we propose a simple but effective 1-to-K contrastive learning method, which treats each language equally and eliminates error propagation and optimization bias. In addition, we propose a new evaluation metric, Mean Rank Variance (MRV), to reflect the rank inconsistency across languages within each instance. Extensive experiments on four CCR datasets show that our method improves both recall rates and MRV with smaller-scale pre-trained data, achieving the new state-of-art.
Zhijie Nie, Richong Zhang, Zhangchi Feng, Hailang Huang, Xudong Liu 0001
KDD4