Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Do Kook Choe

dblp:120/1199 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 88% Language models and text generation · 7% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 5%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Compilers and program optimization · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization
parsing
0.522016
Parsing as Language Modeling · EMNLP 2016
Syntactic Parse Fusion · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis
irony detection
0.212015
Sparse, Contextually Informed Models for Irony Detection: Exploiting User Communities, Entities and Sentiment · ACL (1) 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.212015
Sparse, Contextually Informed Models for Irony Detection: Exploiting User Communities, Entities and Sentiment · ACL (1) 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.212015
Parsing Paraphrases with Joint Inference · ACL (1) 2015
Mathematical optimization
simultaneous inference
0.212015
Parsing Paraphrases with Joint Inference · ACL (1) 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics
word sense induction
0.212013
Naive Bayes Word Sense Induction · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language modeling
0.112016
Parsing as Language Modeling · EMNLP 2016
Compilers and program optimization › parsing
constituency parsing
0.112015
Syntactic Parse Fusion · EMNLP 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network › bayesian network classifiers
naive bayes
0.012013
Naive Bayes Word Sense Induction · EMNLP 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

language modeling · 0.5joint inference · 0.4sparse modeling · 0.2sentiment features · 0.2self-training · 0.2n-best list combination · 0.2entity features · 0.2discriminative reranking · 0.2naive bayes · 0.2extended naive bayes · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Parsing as Language Modeling
Do Kook Choe, Eugene Charniak
EMNLP1
2015 Parsing Paraphrases with Joint Inference
abstract
Do Kook Choe, David McClosky. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2015.
Do Kook Choe, David McClosky
ACL (1)1
2015 Sparse, Contextually Informed Models for Irony Detection: Exploiting User Communities, Entities and Sentiment
abstract
Byron C. Wallace, Do Kook Choe, Eugene Charniak. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2015.
Byron C. Wallace, Do Kook Choe, Eugene Charniak
ACL (1)2
2015 Syntactic Parse Fusion
abstract
Model combination techniques have consistently shown state-of-the-art performance across multiple tasks, including syntactic parsing.However, they dramatically increase runtime and can be difficult to employ in practice.We demonstrate that applying constituency model combination techniques to n-best lists instead of n different parsers results in significant parsing accuracy improvements.Parses are weighted by their probabilities and combined using an adapted version of Sagae and Lavie (2006).These accuracy gains come with marginal computational costs and are obtained on top of existing parsing techniques such as discriminative reranking and self-training, resulting in state-of-the-art accuracy: 92.6% on WSJ section 23.On out-of-domain corpora, accuracy is improved by 0.4% on average.We empirically confirm that six well-known n-best parsers benefit from the proposed methods across six domains.
Do Kook Choe, David McClosky, Eugene Charniak
EMNLP1
2013 Naive Bayes Word Sense Induction
abstract
We introduce an extended naive Bayes model for word sense induction (WSI) and apply it to a WSI task.The extended model incorporates the idea the words closer to the target word are more relevant in predicting its sense.The proposed model is very simple yet effective when evaluated on SemEval-2010 WSI data.
Do Kook Choe, Eugene Charniak
EMNLP1
2012 Efficiently Searching for Frustrated Cycles in MAP Inference
David A. Sontag, Do Kook Choe
UAI2