Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sriramkumar Venugopalan

dblp:120/2584 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 47% Memory systems · 47% Performance modeling and evaluation · 5%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › reliability physics
random telegraph noise
0.322013
Accurate Prediction of Random Telegraph Noise Effects in SRAMs and DRAMs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2013
MUSTARD: a coupled, stochastic/deterministic, discrete/continuous technique for predicting the impact of random telegraph noise on SRAMs and DRAMs · DAC 2011
Memory systems › random-access memory
SRAM
0.322013
Accurate Prediction of Random Telegraph Noise Effects in SRAMs and DRAMs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2013
MUSTARD: a coupled, stochastic/deterministic, discrete/continuous technique for predicting the impact of random telegraph noise on SRAMs and DRAMs · DAC 2011
Memory systems
DRAM
0.012013
Accurate Prediction of Random Telegraph Noise Effects in SRAMs and DRAMs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2013
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › memory reliability
DRAM reliability
0.012013
Accurate Prediction of Random Telegraph Noise Effects in SRAMs and DRAMs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

monte carlo simulation · 0.2computer-aided design · 0.2stochastic simulation · 0.1deterministic circuit simulation · 0.1coupled simulation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Accurate Prediction of Random Telegraph Noise Effects in SRAMs and DRAMs
abstract
With aggressive technology scaling and heightened variability, circuits such as SRAMs and DRAMs have become vulnerable to random telegraph noise (RTN). The bias dependence (i.e., non-stationarity), bi-directional coupling, and high inter-device variability of RTN present significant challenges to understanding its circuit-level effects. In this paper, we present two computer-aided design (CAD) tools, SAMURAI and MUSTARD, for accurately estimating the impact of non-stationary RTN on SRAMs and DRAMs. While traditional (stationary) analysis is often overly pessimistic (e.g., it overestimates RTN-induced SRAM failure rates), the predictions made by SAMURAI and MUSTARD are more reliable by virtue of non-stationary analysis.
Aadithya V. Karthik, Alper Demir 0001, Sriramkumar Venugopalan, Jaijeet S. Roychowdhury
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.3
2011 MUSTARD: a coupled, stochastic/deterministic, discrete/continuous technique for predicting the impact of random telegraph noise on SRAMs and DRAMs
abstract
With aggressive technology scaling and heightened variability, SRAMs and DRAMs have become vulnerable to Random Telegraph Noise (RTN). The bias-dependent, random temporal nature of RTN presents significant challenges to understanding its effects on circuits. In this paper, we propose MUSTARD, a technique and tool for predicting the impact of RTN on SRAMs/DRAMs in the presence of variability. MUSTARD enables accurate, non-stationary, two-way-coupled, discrete stochastic RTN simulation seamlessly integrated with deterministic, continuous circuit simulation. Using MUSTARD, we are able to predict experimentally observed RTN-induced failures in SRAMs, and generate statistical characterisations of bit errors in SRAMs and DRAMs. We also present MUSTARD-generated results showing the effect of RTN on DRAM retention times.
Aadithya V. Karthik, Sriramkumar Venugopalan, Alper Demir 0001, Jaijeet S. Roychowdhury
DAC2
2011 SAMURAI: An accurate method for modelling and simulating non-stationary Random Telegraph Noise in SRAMs
abstract
In latest CMOS technologies, Random Telegraph Noise (RTN) has emerged as an important challenge for SRAM design. Due to rapidly shrinking device sizes and heightened variability, analytical approaches are no longer applicable for characterising the circuit-level impact of non-stationary RTN. Accordingly, this paper presents SAMURAI, a computational method for accurate, trap-level, non-stationary analysis of RTN in SRAMs. The core of SAMURAI is a technique called Markov Uniformisation, which extends stochastic simulation ideas from the biological community and applies them to generate realistic traces of non-stationary RTN in SRAM cells. To the best of our knowledge, SAMURAI is the first computational approach that employs detailed trap-level stochastic RTN generation models to obtain accurate traces of non-stationary RTN at the circuit level. We have also developed a methodology that integrates SAMURAI and SPICE to achieve a simulation-driven approach to RTN characterisation in SRAM cells under (a) arbitrary trap populations, and (b) arbitrarily time-varying bias conditions. Our implementation of this methodology demonstrates that SAMURAI is capable of accurately predicting non-stationary RTN effects such as write errors in SRAM cells.
Aadithya V. Karthik, Alper Demir 0001, Sriramkumar Venugopalan, Jaijeet S. Roychowdhury
DATE3