Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thilo Kroll

dblp:120/4273 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
0000-0003-2082-5117ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
user-centered design
0.012013
Use of an agile bridge in the development of assistive technology · CHI 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user advocate · 0.3participatory design · 0.3agile development · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Use of an agile bridge in the development of assistive technology
abstract
Engaging with end users in the development of assistive technologies remains one of the major challenges for researchers and developers in the field of accessibility and HCI. Developing usable software systems for people with complex disabilities is problematic, software developers are wary of using user-centred design, one of the main methods by which usability can be improved, due to concerns about how best to work with adults with complex disabilities, in particular Severe Speech and Physical Impairments (SSPI) and how to involve them in research. This paper reports on how the adoption of an adapted agile approach involving the incorporation of a user advocate on the research team helped in meeting this challenge in one software project and offers suggestions for how this could be used by other development teams.
Suzanne Prior, Annalu Waller, Rolf Black, Thilo Kroll
CHI4
2013 Chronicles: Supporting Conversational Narrative in Alternative and Augmentative Communication
Annalu Waller, Rachel Menzies, Daniel Herron, Suzanne Prior, Rolf Black, Thilo Kroll
INTERACT (2)6
2013 Focus groups as a requirements gathering method with adults with severe speech and physical impairments
abstract
Technological supports have the potential to greatly improve the quality of life and independence of adults with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI). In particular, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices can enable people with little or no speech to communicate with others. However, the rate of rejection of AAC devices is estimated to be as high as 53.3%. It is suggested that a major reason for this rejection is a lack of user-centred design in the development of these devices. As part of a wider study looking at involving adults with SSPI in all stages of user-centred design, this paper looks at the use of focus groups in requirements gathering with this user group.
Suzanne Prior, Annalu Waller, Thilo Kroll
Behav. Inf. Technol.3
2011 The CHAMPION software project
abstract
A visit to hospital is traumatic for both a patient with disabilities and their family members, especially when the patient has no or limited functional speech [1]. For adults with Severe Speech and Physical Impairments (SSPI) being hospitalized presents particular challenges as hospital staff are often unaware of how the adult with SSPI communicates and what their basic care needs are.
Suzanne Prior, Annalu Waller, Thilo Kroll
ASSETS3