Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhaoyang Liu 0003
dblp:120/5899-3
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8820-5531ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Language models and text generation · 51% Generative modeling · 12% Reinforcement learning · 12% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Recommender systems · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Smart cities and intelligent transportation · 74% Computational finance and economics · 26% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems
sequential recommendation |
1.4 | 3 | 2022 | Contrastive Learning for Sequential Recommendation · ICDE 2022 Sequential Recommendation with Self-Attentive Multi-Adversarial Network · SIGIR 2020 Intent Preference Decoupling for User Representation on Online Recommender System · IJCAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › discrete diffusion model
diffusion language model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | d-TreeRPO: Towards More Reliable Policy Optimization for Diffusion Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | d-TreeRPO: Towards More Reliable Policy Optimization for Diffusion Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What is Wrong with Perplexity for Long-context Language Modeling? · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What is Wrong with Perplexity for Long-context Language Modeling? · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation › capability evaluation
long-context evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What is Wrong with Perplexity for Long-context Language Modeling? · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
long-context language modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What is Wrong with Perplexity for Long-context Language Modeling? · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
perplexity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What is Wrong with Perplexity for Long-context Language Modeling? · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series forecasting |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MASTER: Market-Guided Stock Transformer for Stock Price Forecasting · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MASTER: Market-Guided Stock Transformer for Stock Price Forecasting · AAAI 2024 |
Smart cities and intelligent transportation
bike sharing systems |
0.7 | 2 | 2018 | Inferring Dockless Shared Bike Distribution in New Cities · WSDM 2018 Where Will Dockless Shared Bikes be Stacked?: - Parking Hotspots Detection in a New City · KDD 2018 |
Recommender systems › sequential recommendation
cross-platform recommendation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Contrastive Learning for Sequential Recommendation · ICDE 2022 |
Recommender systems › user modeling
user representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Intent Preference Decoupling for User Representation on Online Recommender System · IJCAI 2020 |
Computational finance and economics › financial market prediction
stock price prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | MASTER: Market-Guided Stock Transformer for Stock Price Forecasting · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Contrastive Learning for Sequential Recommendation · ICDE 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Intent Preference Decoupling for User Representation on Online Recommender System · IJCAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Inferring Dockless Shared Bike Distribution in New Cities · WSDM 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive learning · 2.0transformer · 1.5market-guided feature selection · 1.5intra-stock and inter-stock aggregation · 1.5multi-task learning · 1.1data augmentation · 1.1reinforcement learning · 1.0policy optimization · 1.0meta-learning · 0.9domain adaptation · 0.7self-attention · 0.4maximum likelihood estimation · 0.4adversarial training · 0.4kernel density estimation · 0.3factor analysis · 0.3convolutional neural network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | d-TreeRPO: Towards More Reliable Policy Optimization for Diffusion Language ModelsabstractLeyi Pan, Shuchang Tao, Yunpeng Zhai, Zheyu Fu, Liancheng Fang, Minghua He, Lingzhe Zhang, Zhaoyang Liu, Bolin Ding, Aiwei Liu, Lijie Wen. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Leyi Pan, Shuchang Tao, Yunpeng Zhai, Zheyu Fu, Liancheng Fang, Minghua He, Lingzhe Zhang, Zhaoyang Liu 0003, Bolin Ding, Aiwei Liu, Lijie Wen 0001 |
ACL (1) | 8 |
| 2025 | What is Wrong with Perplexity for Long-context Language Modeling?abstractHandling long-context inputs is crucial for large language models (LLMs) in tasks such as extended conversations, document summarization, and many-shot in-context learning. While recent approaches have extended the context windows of LLMs and employed perplexity (PPL) as a standard evaluation metric, PPL has proven unreliable for assessing long-context capabilities. The underlying cause of this limitation has remained unclear. In this work, we provide a comprehensive explanation for this issue. We find that PPL overlooks key tokens, which are essential for long-context understanding, by averaging across all tokens and thereby obscuring the true performance of models in long-context scenarios. To address this, we propose \textbf{LongPPL}, a novel metric that focuses on key tokens by employing a long-short context contrastive method to identify them. Our experiments demonstrate that LongPPL strongly correlates with performance on various long-context benchmarks (e.g., Pearson correlation of -0.96), significantly outperforming traditional PPL in predictive accuracy. Additionally, we introduce \textbf{LongCE} (Long-context Cross-Entropy) loss, a re-weighting strategy for fine-tuning that prioritizes key tokens, leading to consistent improvements across diverse benchmarks. In summary, these contributions offer deeper insights into the limitations of PPL and present effective solutions for accurately evaluating and enhancing the long-context capabilities of LLMs. Code is available at https://github.com/PKU-ML/LongPPL. Lizhe Fang, Yifei Wang 0001, Zhaoyang Liu 0003, Chenheng Zhang, Stefanie Jegelka, Jinyang Gao, Bolin Ding, Yisen Wang 0001 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | MASTER: Market-Guided Stock Transformer for Stock Price ForecastingabstractStock price forecasting has remained an extremely challenging problem for many decades due to the high volatility of the stock market. Recent efforts have been devoted to modeling complex stock correlations toward joint stock price forecasting. Existing works share a common neural architecture that learns temporal patterns from individual stock series and then mixes up temporal representations to establish stock correlations. However, they only consider time-aligned stock correlations stemming from all the input stock features, which suffer from two limitations. First, stock correlations often occur momentarily and in a cross-time manner. Second, the feature effectiveness is dynamic with market variation, which affects both the stock sequential patterns and their correlations. To address the limitations, this paper introduces MASTER, a MArkert-guided Stock TransformER, which models the momentary and cross-time stock correlation and leverages market information for automatic feature selection. MASTER elegantly tackles the complex stock correlation by alternatively engaging in intra-stock and inter-stock information aggregation. Experiments show the superiority of MASTER compared with previous works and visualize the captured realistic stock correlation to provide valuable insights. Tong Li 0017, Zhaoyang Liu 0003, Yanyan Shen |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2022 | Contrastive Learning for Sequential RecommendationabstractSequential recommendation methods play a crucial role in modern recommender systems because of their ability to capture a user's dynamic interest from her/his historical inter-actions. Despite their success, we argue that these approaches usually rely on the sequential prediction task to optimize the huge amounts of parameters. They usually suffer from the data sparsity problem, which makes it difficult for them to learn high-quality user representations. To tackle that, inspired by recent advances of contrastive learning techniques in the computer vision, we propose a novel multi-task framework called Contrastive Learning for Sequential Recommendation (CL4SRec). CL4SRec not only takes advantage of the traditional next item prediction task but also utilizes the contrastive learning framework to derive self-supervision signals from the original user behavior sequences. Therefore, it can extract more meaningful user patterns and further encode the user representations effectively. In addition, we propose three data augmentation approaches to construct self-supervision signals. Extensive experiments on four public datasets demonstrate that CL4SRec achieves state-of-the-art performance over existing baselines by inferring better user representations. Fei Sun 0001, Zhaoyang Liu 0003, Shiwen Wu, Jinyang Gao, Bolin Ding, Bin Cui 0001 |
ICDE | 3 |
| 2021 | CausCF: Causal Collaborative Filtering for Recommendation Effect EstimationabstractTo improve user experience and profits of corporations, modern industrial recommender systems usually aim to select the items that are most likely to be interacted with (e.g., clicks and purchases). However, they overlook the fact that users may purchase the items even without recommendations. The real effective items are the ones that can contribute to purchase probability uplift. To select these effective items, it is essential to estimate the causal effect of recommendations. Nevertheless, it is difficult to obtain the real causal effect since we can only recommend or not recommend an item to a user at one time. Furthermore, previous works usually rely on the randomized controlled trial (RCT) experiment to evaluate their performance. However, it is usually not practicable in the recommendation scenario due to its expensive experimental cost. To tackle these problems, in this paper, we propose a causal collaborative filtering (CausCF) method inspired by the widely adopted collaborative filtering (CF) technique. It is based on the idea that similar users not only have a similar taste on items but also have similar treatment effects under recommendations. CausCF extends the classical matrix factorization to the tensor factorization with three dimensions---user, item, and treatment. Furthermore, we also employ regression discontinuity design (RDD) to evaluate the precision of the estimated causal effects from different models. With the testable assumptions, RDD analysis can provide an unbiased causal conclusion without RCT experiments. Through dedicated experiments on both offline and online experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed CausCF on the causal effect estimation and ranking performance improvement. Zhaoyang Liu 0003, Shiwen Wu, Fei Sun 0001, Cihang Liu, Jiawei Chen 0007, Jinyang Gao, Bin Cui 0001, Bolin Ding |
CIKM | 2 |
| 2020 | Intent Preference Decoupling for User Representation on Online Recommender SystemabstractAccurately characterizing the user's current interest is the core of recommender systems. However, users' interests are dynamic and affected by intent factors and preference factors. The intent factors imply users' current needs and change among different visits. The preference factors are relatively stable and learned continuously over time. Existing works either resort to the sequential recommendation to model the current browsing intent and historical preference separately or just mix up these two factors during online learning. In this paper, we propose a novel learning strategy named FLIP to decouple the learning of intent and preference under the online settings. The learning of the intent is considered as a meta-learning task and fast adaptive to the current browsing; the learning of the preference is based on the calibrated user intent and constantly updated over time. We conducted experiments on two public datasets and a real-world recommender system. When equipping it with modern recommendation methods, significant improvements are demonstrated over strong baselines. Zhaoyang Liu 0003, Fei Sun 0001, Jinyang Gao, Bolin Ding, Yanyan Shen |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Sequential Recommendation with Self-Attentive Multi-Adversarial NetworkabstractRecently, deep learning has made significant progress in the task of sequential recommendation. Existing neural sequential recommenders typically adopt a generative way trained with Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE). When context information (called factor) is involved, it is difficult to analyze when and how each individual factor would affect the final recommendation performance. Ruiyang Ren, Zhaoyang Liu 0003, Yaliang Li, Wayne Xin Zhao, Hui Wang 0072, Bolin Ding, Ji-Rong Wen |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2018 | Where Will Dockless Shared Bikes be Stacked?: - Parking Hotspots Detection in a New CityabstractDockless shared bikes, which aim at providing a more flexible and convenient solution to the first-and-last mile connection, come into China and expand to other countries at a very impressing speed. The expansion of shared bike business in new cities brings many challenges among which, the most critical one is the parking chaos caused by too many bikes yet insufficient demands. To allow possible actions to be taken in advance, this paper studies the problem of detecting parking hotspots in a new city where no dockless shared bike has been deployed. We propose to measure road hotness by bike density with the help of the Kernal Density Estimation. We extract useful features from multi-source urban data and introduce a novel domain adaption network for transferring hotspots knowledge learned from one city with shared bikes to a new city. The extensive experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach compared with various baselines. Zhaoyang Liu 0003, Yanyan Shen, Yanmin Zhu 0006 |
KDD | 1 |
| 2018 | Inferring Dockless Shared Bike Distribution in New CitiesabstractRecently, dockless shared bike services have achieved great success and reinvented bike sharing business in China. When expanding bike sharing business into a new city, most start-ups always wish to find out how to cover the whole city with a suitable bike distribution. In this paper, we study the problem of inferring bike distribution in new cities, which is challenging. As no dockless bikes are deployed in the new city, we propose to learn insights on bike distribution from cities populated with dockless bikes. We exploit multi-source data to identify important features that affect bike distributions and develop a novel inference model combining Factor Analysis and Convolutional Neural Network techniques. The extensive experiments on real-life datasets show that the proposed solution provides significantly more accurate inference results compared with competitive prediction methods. Zhaoyang Liu 0003, Yanyan Shen, Yanmin Zhu 0006 |
WSDM | 1 |