Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marc Bux

dblp:120/6870 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 50% Parallel and multicore computing · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Indexing and storage engines · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel scheduling
adaptive scheduling
0.212015
SAASFEE: Scalable Scientific Workflow Execution Engine · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015
High-performance computing › scientific workflow
scientific workflow management
0.212015
SAASFEE: Scalable Scientific Workflow Execution Engine · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015
Parallel and multicore computing
task scheduling
0.212015
SAASFEE: Scalable Scientific Workflow Execution Engine · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015
High-performance computing › scientific workflow
workflow engine
0.212015
SAASFEE: Scalable Scientific Workflow Execution Engine · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.212013
RCSI: Scalable similarity search in thousand(s) of genomes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
read mapping
0.212013
RCSI: Scalable similarity search in thousand(s) of genomes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2013
Indexing and storage engines
string indexing
0.212013
RCSI: Scalable similarity search in thousand(s) of genomes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

referential compression · 0.3edit distance search · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Predictive performance modeling for distributed batch processing using black box monitoring and machine learning
Carl Witt, Marc Bux, Wladislaw Gusew, Ulf Leser
Inf. Syst.2
2017 Hi-WAY: Execution of Scientific Workflows on Hadoop YARN
abstract
Scientific workflows provide a means to model, execute, and exchange the increasingly complex analysis pipelines necessary for today’s data-driven science. However, existing scientific workflow man ...
Marc Bux, Jörgen Brandt, Carl Witt, Jim Dowling, Ulf Leser
EDBT1
2015 DynamicCloudSim: Simulating heterogeneity in computational clouds
Marc Bux, Ulf Leser
Future Gener. Comput. Syst.1
2015 SAASFEE: Scalable Scientific Workflow Execution Engine
abstract
Across many fields of science, primary data sets like sensor read-outs, time series, and genomic sequences are analyzed by complex chains of specialized tools and scripts exchanging intermediate results in domain-specific file formats. Scientific workflow management systems (SWfMSs) support the development and execution of these tool chains by providing workflow specification languages, graphical editors, fault-tolerant execution engines, etc. However, many SWfMSs are not prepared to handle large data sets because of inadequate support for distributed computing. On the other hand, most SWfMSs that do support distributed computing only allow static task execution orders. We present SAASFEE, a SWfMS which runs arbitrarily complex workflows on Hadoop YARN. Workflows are specified in Cuneiform, a functional workflow language focusing on parallelization and easy integration of existing software. Cuneiform workflows are executed on Hi-WAY, a higher-level scheduler for running workflows on YARN. Distinct features of SAASFEE are the ability to execute iterative workflows, an adaptive task scheduler, re-executable provenance traces, and compatibility to selected other workflow systems. In the demonstration, we present all components of SAASFEE using real-life workflows from the field of genomics.
Marc Bux, Jörgen Brandt, Carsten Lipka, Kamal Hakimzadeh, Jim Dowling, Ulf Leser
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2013 RCSI: Scalable similarity search in thousand(s) of genomes
abstract
Until recently, genomics has concentrated on comparing sequences between species. However, due to the sharply falling cost of sequencing technology, studies of populations of individuals of the same species are now feasible and promise advances in areas such as personalized medicine and treatment of genetic diseases. A core operation in such studies is read mapping, i.e., finding all parts of a set of genomes which are within edit distance k to a given query sequence ( k -approximate search). To achieve sufficient speed, current algorithms solve this problem only for one to-be-searched genome and compute only approximate solutions, i.e., they miss some k - approximate occurrences. We present RCSI, Referentially Compressed Search Index, which scales to a thousand genomes and computes the exact answer. It exploits the fact that genomes of different individuals of the same species are highly similar by first compressing the to-be-searched genomes with respect to a reference genome. Given a query, RCSI then searches the reference and all genome-specific individual differences. We propose efficient data structures for representing compressed genomes and present algorithms for scalable compression and similarity search. We evaluate our algorithms on a set of 1092 human genomes, which amount to approx. 3 TB of raw data. RCSI compresses this set by a ratio of 450:1 (26:1 including the search index) and answers similarity queries on a mid-class server in 15 ms on average even for comparably large error thresholds, thereby significantly outperforming other methods. Furthermore, we present a fast and adaptive heuristic for choosing the best reference sequence for referential compression, a problem that was never studied before at this scale.
Sebastian Wandelt, Johannes Starlinger, Marc Bux, Ulf Leser
Proc. VLDB Endow.3