Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Devansh Arpit
dblp:120/8494
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers
9as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 17 · 8 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
13 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 35% Learning theory · 12% Optimization for machine learning · 10% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 29 heaviest of 33, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Retroformer: Retrospective Large Language Agents with Policy Gradient Optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Retroformer: Retrospective Large Language Agents with Policy Gradient Optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Merlion: End-to-End Machine Learning for Time Series · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
normalization |
0.6 | 2 | 2019 | How to Initialize your Network? Robust Initialization for WeightNorm & ResNets · NeurIPS 2019 Normalization Propagation: A Parametric Technique for Removing Internal Covariate Shift in Deep Networks · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Fraternal Dropout · ICLR (Poster) 2018 Why Regularized Auto-Encoders learn Sparse Representation? · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Ensemble of Averages: Improving Model Selection and Boosting Performance in Domain Generalization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Ensemble of Averages: Improving Model Selection and Boosting Performance in Domain Generalization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian model selection
model averaging |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Ensemble of Averages: Improving Model Selection and Boosting Performance in Domain Generalization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
model ensemble |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Ensemble of Averages: Improving Model Selection and Boosting Performance in Domain Generalization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Catastrophic Fisher Explosion: Early Phase Fisher Matrix Impacts Generalization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit regularization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Catastrophic Fisher Explosion: Early Phase Fisher Matrix Impacts Generalization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape
loss landscape curvature |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Catastrophic Fisher Explosion: Early Phase Fisher Matrix Impacts Generalization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | h-detach: Modifying the LSTM Gradient Towards Better Optimization · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
LSTM |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | h-detach: Modifying the LSTM Gradient Towards Better Optimization · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | h-detach: Modifying the LSTM Gradient Towards Better Optimization · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › inductive bias
spectral bias |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networks · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
weight initialization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | How to Initialize your Network? Robust Initialization for WeightNorm & ResNets · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › normalization
weight normalization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | How to Initialize your Network? Robust Initialization for WeightNorm & ResNets · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
dropout |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Fraternal Dropout · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
iterative inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Residual Connections Encourage Iterative Inference · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
residual network |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Residual Connections Encourage Iterative Inference · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networks · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
memorization and generalization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networks · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Why Regularized Auto-Encoders learn Sparse Representation? · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
internal covariate shift |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Normalization Propagation: A Parametric Technique for Removing Internal Covariate Shift in Deep Networks · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Why Regularized Auto-Encoders learn Sparse Representation? · ICML 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Dimensionality Reduction with Subspace Structure Preservation · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | The Break-Even Point on Optimization Trajectories of Deep Neural Networks · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
data manifold |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networks · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model ensembling · 1.3anomaly score calibration · 1.3AutoML · 1.3verbal feedback · 0.8retrospective model · 0.8policy gradient · 0.8dropout · 0.6bias-variance trade-off · 0.6stochastic gradient descent · 0.5fisher information matrix · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Retroformer: Retrospective Large Language Agents with Policy Gradient OptimizationabstractRecent months have seen the emergence of a powerful new trend in which large language models (LLMs) are augmented to become autonomous language agents capable of performing objective oriented multi-step tasks on their own, rather than merely responding to queries from human users. Most existing language agents, however, are not optimized using environment-specific rewards. Although some agents enable iterative refinement through verbal feedback, they do not reason and plan in ways that are compatible with gradient-based learning from rewards. This paper introduces a principled framework for reinforcing large language agents by learning a retrospective model, which automatically tunes the language agent prompts from environment feedback through policy gradient. Specifically, our proposed agent architecture learns from rewards across multiple environments and tasks, for fine-tuning a pre-trained language model which refines the language agent prompt by summarizing the root cause of prior failed attempts and proposing action plans. Experimental results on various tasks demonstrate that the language agents improve over time and that our approach considerably outperforms baselines that do not properly leverage gradients from the environment. Weiran Yao, Shelby Heinecke, Juan Carlos Niebles, Zhiwei Liu 0001, Yihao Feng, Le Xue, Rithesh R. N., Zeyuan Chen 0001, Jianguo Zhang 0005, Devansh Arpit, Ran Xu 0001, Phil Mui, Huan Wang 0016, Caiming Xiong, Silvio Savarese |
ICLR | 10 |
| 2023 | Merlion: End-to-End Machine Learning for Time SeriesabstractWe introduce Merlion, an open-source machine learning library for time series. It features a unified interface for many commonly used models and datasets for forecasting and anomaly detection on both univariate and multivariate time series, along with standard pre/post-processing layers. It has several modules to improve ease-of-use, including a no-code visual dashboard, anomaly score calibration to improve interpetability, AutoML for hyperparameter tuning and model selection, and model ensembling. Merlion also provides an evaluation framework that simulates the live deployment of a model in production, and a distributed computing backend to run time series models at industrial scale. This library aims to provide engineers and researchers a one-stop solution to rapidly develop models for their specific time series needs and benchmark them across multiple datasets. Aadyot Bhatnagar, Paul Kassianik, Tian Lan 0006, Wenzhuo Yang, Rowan Cassius, Doyen Sahoo, Devansh Arpit, Sri Subramanian, Gerald Woo, Amrita Saha, Arun Kumar Jagota, Gokulakrishnan Gopalakrishnan, K. C. Krithika, Sukumar Maddineni, Dae-ki Cho, Bo Zong, Yingbo Zhou 0002, Caiming Xiong, Silvio Savarese, Steven C. H. Hoi, Huan Wang 0016 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 8 |
| 2022 | Ensemble of Averages: Improving Model Selection and Boosting Performance in Domain GeneralizationabstractIn Domain Generalization (DG) settings, models trained independently on a given set of training domains have notoriously chaotic performance on distribution shifted test domains, and stochasticity in optimization (e.g. seed) plays a big role. This makes deep learning models unreliable in real world settings. We first show that this chaotic behavior exists even along the training optimization trajectory of a single model, and propose a simple model averaging protocol that both significantly boosts domain generalization and diminishes the impact of stochasticity by improving the rank correlation between the in-domain validation accuracy and out-domain test accuracy, which is crucial for reliable early stopping. Taking advantage of our observation, we show that instead of ensembling unaveraged models (that is typical in practice), ensembling moving average models (EoA) from independent runs further boosts performance. We theoretically explain the boost in performance of ensembling and model averaging by adapting the well known Bias-Variance trade-off to the domain generalization setting. On the DomainBed benchmark, when using a pre-trained ResNet-50, this ensemble of averages achieves an average of $68.0\%$, beating vanilla ERM (w/o averaging/ensembling) by $\sim 4\%$, and when using a pre-trained RegNetY-16GF, achieves an average of $76.6\%$, beating vanilla ERM by $\sim 6\%$. Devansh Arpit, Huan Wang 0016, Yingbo Zhou 0002, Caiming Xiong |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Catastrophic Fisher Explosion: Early Phase Fisher Matrix Impacts GeneralizationabstractThe early phase of training a deep neural network has a dramatic effect on the local curvature of the loss function. For instance, using a small learning rate does not guarantee stable optimization because the optimization trajectory has a tendency to steer towards regions of the loss surface with increasing local curvature. We ask whether this tendency is connected to the widely observed phenomenon that the choice of the learning rate strongly influences generalization. We first show that stochastic gradient descent (SGD) implicitly penalizes the trace of the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM), a measure of the local curvature, from the start of training. We argue it is an implicit regularizer in SGD by showing that explicitly penalizing the trace of the FIM can significantly improve generalization. We highlight that poor final generalization coincides with the trace of the FIM attaining a large value early in training, to which we refer as catastrophic Fisher explosion. Finally, to gain insight into the regularization effect of penalizing the trace of the FIM, we show that it limits memorization by reducing the learning speed of examples with noisy labels more than that of the examples with clean labels. Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Devansh Arpit, Oliver Åstrand, Giancarlo Kerg, Huan Wang 0016, Caiming Xiong, Richard Socher, Kyunghyun Cho, Krzysztof J. Geras |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | The Break-Even Point on Optimization Trajectories of Deep Neural Networks
Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Maciej Szymczak, Stanislav Fort, Devansh Arpit, Jacek Tabor, Kyunghyun Cho, Krzysztof J. Geras |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2019 | h-detach: Modifying the LSTM Gradient Towards Better Optimization
Bhargav Kanuparthi, Devansh Arpit, Giancarlo Kerg, Nan Rosemary Ke, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Yoshua Bengio |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2019 | On the Spectral Bias of Neural NetworksabstractNeural networks are known to be a class of highly expressive functions able to fit even random input-output mappings with 100% accuracy. In this work we present properties of neural networks that complement this aspect of expressivity. By using tools from Fourier analysis, we highlight a learning bias of deep networks towards low frequency functions – i.e. functions that vary globally without local fluctuations – which manifests itself as a frequency-dependent learning speed. Intuitively, this property is in line with the observation that over-parameterized networks prioritize learning simple patterns that generalize across data samples. We also investigate the role of the shape of the data manifold by presenting empirical and theoretical evidence that, somewhat counter-intuitively, learning higher frequencies gets easier with increasing manifold complexity. Nasim Rahaman, Aristide Baratin, Devansh Arpit, Felix Draxler, Fred A. Hamprecht, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron C. Courville |
ICML | 3 |
| 2019 | How to Initialize your Network? Robust Initialization for WeightNorm & ResNetsabstractResidual networks (ResNet) and weight normalization play an important role in various deep learning applications. However, parameter initialization strategies have not been studied previously for weight normalized networks and, in practice, initialization methods designed for un-normalized networks are used as a proxy. Similarly, initialization for ResNets have also been studied for un-normalized networks and often under simplified settings ignoring the shortcut connection. To address these issues, we propose a novel parameter initialization strategy that avoids explosion/vanishment of information across layers for weight normalized networks with and without residual connections. The proposed strategy is based on a theoretical analysis using mean field approximation. We run over 2,500 experiments and evaluate our proposal on image datasets showing that the proposed initialization outperforms existing initialization methods in terms of generalization performance, robustness to hyper-parameter values and variance between seeds, especially when networks get deeper in which case existing methods fail to even start training. Finally, we show that using our initialization in conjunction with learning rate warmup is able to reduce the gap between the performance of weight normalized and batch normalized networks. Devansh Arpit, Victor Campos 0001, Yoshua Bengio |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Width of Minima Reached by Stochastic Gradient Descent is Influenced by Learning Rate to Batch Size Ratio
Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Zachary Kenton, Devansh Arpit, Nicolas Ballas, Asja Fischer, Yoshua Bengio, Amos J. Storkey |
ICANN (3) | 3 |
| 2018 | Residual Connections Encourage Iterative Inference
Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Devansh Arpit, Nicolas Ballas, Vikas Verma, Tong Che, Yoshua Bengio |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2018 | Fraternal Dropout
Konrad Zolna, Devansh Arpit, Dendi Suhubdy, Yoshua Bengio |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2017 | A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep NetworksabstractWe examine the role of memorization in deep learning, drawing connections to capacity, generalization, and adversarial robustness. While deep networks are capable of memorizing noise data, our results suggest that they tend to prioritize learning simple patterns first. In our experiments, we expose qualitative differences in gradient-based optimization of deep neural networks (DNNs) on noise vs.~real data. We also demonstrate that for appropriately tuned explicit regularization (e.g.,~dropout) we can degrade DNN training performance on noise datasets without compromising generalization on real data. Our analysis suggests that the notions of effective capacity which are dataset independent are unlikely to explain the generalization performance of deep networks when trained with gradient based methods because training data itself plays an important role in determining the degree of memorization. Devansh Arpit, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Nicolas Ballas, David Krueger 0001, Emmanuel Bengio, Maxinder S. Kanwal, Tegan Maharaj, Asja Fischer, Aaron C. Courville, Yoshua Bengio, Simon Lacoste-Julien |
ICML | 1 |
| 2016 | Normalization Propagation: A Parametric Technique for Removing Internal Covariate Shift in Deep NetworksabstractWhile the authors of Batch Normalization (BN) identify and address an important problem involved in training deep networks– \textitInternal Covariate Shift– the current solution has certain drawbacks. For instance, BN depends on batch statistics for layerwise input normalization during training which makes the estimates of mean and standard deviation of input (distribution) to hidden layers inaccurate due to shifting parameter values (especially during initial training epochs). Another fundamental problem with BN is that it cannot be used with batch-size 1 during training. We address these drawbacks of BN by proposing a non-adaptive normalization technique for removing covariate shift, that we call \textitNormalization Propagation. Our approach does not depend on batch statistics, but rather uses a data-independent parametric estimate of mean and standard-deviation in every layer thus being computationally faster compared with BN. We exploit the observation that the pre-activation before Rectified Linear Units follow Gaussian distribution in deep networks, and that once the first and second order statistics of any given dataset are normalized, we can forward propagate this normalization without the need for recalculating the approximate statistics for hidden layers. Devansh Arpit, Yingbo Zhou 0002, Bhargava Urala Kota, Venu Govindaraju |
ICML | 1 |
| 2016 | Why Regularized Auto-Encoders learn Sparse Representation?abstractSparse distributed representation is the key to learning useful features in deep learning algorithms, because not only it is an efficient mode of data representation, but also – more importantly – it captures the generation process of most real world data. While a number of regularized auto-encoders (AE) enforce sparsity explicitly in their learned representation and others don’t, there has been little formal analysis on what encourages sparsity in these models in general. Our objective is to formally study this general problem for regularized auto-encoders. We provide sufficient conditions on both regularization and activation functions that encourage sparsity. We show that multiple popular models (de-noising and contractive auto encoders, e.g.) and activations (rectified linear and sigmoid, e.g.) satisfy these conditions; thus, our conditions help explain sparsity in their learned representation. Thus our theoretical and empirical analysis together shed light on the properties of regularization/activation that are conductive to sparsity and unify a number of existing auto-encoder models and activation functions under the same analytical framework. Devansh Arpit, Yingbo Zhou 0002, Hung Q. Ngo 0001, Venu Govindaraju |
ICML | 1 |
| 2014 | Dimensionality Reduction with Subspace Structure Preservation
Devansh Arpit, Ifeoma Nwogu, Venu Govindaraju |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2013 | Ridge Regression based classifiers for large scale class imbalanced datasetsabstractLarge scale, class imbalanced data classification is a challenging task that occurs frequently in several computer vision tasks such as web video retrieval. A number of algorithms have been proposed in literature that approach this problem from different perspectives (e.g. Sampling, Cost-sensitive learning, Active learning). The challenge is two fold in this task - first the data imbalance causes many classification algorithms to learn trivial classifiers that declare all test examples to be from the majority class. Second, many algorithms do not scale to large dataset sizes. We address these two issues by using two different cost-sensitive versions of Ridge Regression as our binary classifiers. We demonstrate our approach for retrieving unstructured web videos from 10 events on the benchmark TRECVID MED 12 dataset containing ≈47000 videos. We empirically show that they perform at par with state-of-the-art support vector machine based classifiers using χ2kernels while being 30 to 60 times faster. Devansh Arpit, Shuang Wu 0003, Pradeep Natarajan, Rohit Prasad, Premkumar Natarajan |
WACV | 1 |
| 2012 | Locality-constrained Low Rank Coding for face recognition
Devansh Arpit, Gaurav Srivastava 0004, Yun Fu 0001 |
ICPR | 1 |
| 2011 | Fingerprint feature extraction from gray scale images by ridge tracingabstractThis paper deals with extraction of fingerprint features directly from gray scale images by the method of ridge tracing. While doing so, we make substantial use of contextual information gathered during the tracing process. Narrow bandpass based filtering methods for fingerprint image enhancement are extremely robust as noisy regions do not affect the result of cleaner ones. However, these method often generate artifacts whenever the underlying image does not fit the filter model, which may be due to the presence of noise and singularities. The proposed method allows us to use the contextual information to better handle such noisy regions. Moreover, the various parameters used in the algorithm have been made adaptive in order to circumvent human supervision. The experimental results from our algorithm have been compared with those from Gabor based filtering and feature extraction, as well as with the original ridge tracing work from Maio and Maltoni [11]. The results clearly indicate that the proposed approach makes ridge tracing more robust to noise and makes the extracted features more reliable. Devansh Arpit, Anoop M. Namboodiri |
IJCB | 1 |