SIGCSE is packed with teaching insights and inspiration. However, we get these insights and inspiration from hearing our colleagues talk about their teaching. Why not watch them teach? This session does exactly that! Six exceptional educators will present innovative content just as they would to their students. The moderator, Colleen Lewis, will describe their pedagogical moves and how they connect to education research. The goal of the session is to inspire SIGCSE attendees by highlighting innovative instruction by exceptional educators. Attendees can adopt the content and/or pedagogical moves from each microteaching example.

Crowd video analysis has applications in crowd management, public space design, and visual surveillance. Example tasks potentially aided by automated analysis include anomaly detection (such as a person walking against the grain of traffic or rapid assembly/dispersion of groups of people), population and density measurements, and interactions between groups of people. This survey explores crowd analysis as it relates to two primary research areas: crowd statistics and behavior understanding. First, we survey methods for counting individuals and approximating the density of the crowd. Second, we showcase research efforts on behavior understanding as related to crowds. These works focus on identifying groups, interactions within small groups, and abnormal activity detection such as riots and bottlenecks in large crowds. Works presented in this section also focus on tracking groups of individuals, either as a single entity or a subset of individuals within the frame of reference. Finally, a summary of datasets available for crowd activity video research is provided.

Facial recognition algorithms should be able to operate even when similar-looking individuals are encountered, or even in the extreme case of identical twins. An experimental data set comprised of 17486 images from 126 pairs of identical twins (252 subjects) collected on the same day and 6864 images from 120 pairs of identical twins (240 subjects) with images taken a year later was used to measure the performance on seven different face recognition algorithms. Performance is reported for variations in illumination, expression, gender, and age for both the same day and cross-year image sets. Regardless of the conditions of image acquisition, distinguishing identical twins are significantly harder than distinguishing subjects who are not identical twins for all algorithms.

Biometric identification systems must be able to distinguish between individuals even in situations where the bio metric signature may be similar, such as in the case of identical twins. This paper presents experiments done in facial recognition using data from a set of images of twins. This work establishes the current state of facial recognition in regards to twins and the accuracy of current state-of-the art programs in distinguishing between identical twins using three commercial face matchers, Cognitec 8.3.2.0, VeriLook 4.0, and PittPatt 4.2.1 and a baseline matcher employing Local Region PCA. Overall, it was observed that Cognitec had the best performance. All matchers, how ever, saw degradation in performance compared to an experiment where the ability to distinguish unrelated persons was assessed. In particular, lighting and expression seemed to have affected performance the most.