Recent discoveries have revealed that deep neural networks might behave in a biased manner in many real-world scenarios. For instance, deep networks trained on a large-scale face recognition dataset CelebA tend to predict blonde hair for females and black hair for males. Such biases not only jeopardize the robustness of models but also perpetuate and amplify social biases, which is especially concerning for automated decision-making processes in healthcare, recruitment, etc., as they could exacerbate unfair economic and social inequalities among different groups. Existing debiasing methods suffer from high costs in bias labeling or model re-training, while also exhibiting a deficiency in terms of elucidating the origins of biases within the model. To this respect, we propose a fast model debiasing method (FMD) which offers an efficient approach to identify, evaluate and remove biases inherent in trained models. The FMD identifies biased attributes through an explicit counterfactual concept and quantifies the influence of data samples with influence functions. Moreover, we design a machine unlearning-based strategy to efficiently and effectively remove the bias in a trained model with a small counterfactual dataset. Experiments on the Colored MNIST, CelebA, and Adult Income datasets demonstrate that our method achieves superior or competing classification accuracies compared with state-of-the-art retraining-based methods while attaining significantly fewer biases and requiring much less debiasing cost. Notably, our method requires only a small external dataset and updating a minimal amount of model parameters, without the requirement of access to training data that may be too large or unavailable in practice.

Accurately delineating individual teeth and the gingiva in the three-dimension (3D) intraoral scanned (IOS) mesh data plays a pivotal role in many digital dental applications, e.g., orthodontics. Recent research shows that deep learning based methods can achieve promising results for 3D tooth segmentation, however, most of them rely on high-quality labeled dataset which is usually of small scales as annotating IOS meshes requires intensive human efforts. In this paper, we propose a novel self-supervised learning framework, named STSNet, to boost the performance of 3D tooth segmentation leveraging on large-scale unlabeled IOS data. The framework follows two-stage training, i.e., pre-training and fine-tuning. In pre-training, three hierarchical-level, i.e., point-level, region-level, cross-level, contrastive losses are proposed for unsupervised representation learning on a set of predefined matched points from different augmented views. The pretrained segmentation backbone is further fine-tuned in a supervised manner with a small number of labeled IOS meshes. With the same amount of annotated samples, our method can achieve an mIoU of 89.88%, significantly outperforming the supervised counterparts. The performance gain becomes more remarkable when only a small amount of labeled samples are available. Furthermore, STSNet can achieve better performance with only 40% of the annotated samples as compared to the fully supervised baselines. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first attempt of unsupervised pre-training for 3D tooth segmentation, demonstrating its strong potential in reducing human efforts for annotation and verification.

Drivers may adapt to the automatic braking control feature available on adaptive cruise control (ACC) in ways unintended by designers. This study examines drivers' adaptation using a conceptual model of adaptive behavior developed and examined quantitatively using logistic regression techniques. Data for this model come from a field operational test on the use of an advanced collision avoidance system, which integrated forward collision warning and ACC functions. A sample of “closing” events was extracted from a subset of these ACC data. The logistic regression model predicted the drivers' likelihood to intervene (i.e., manually brake) whenever ACC began braking or slowing down the vehicle. The results indicate that several factors influence drivers' response, including the environment, selected gap setting, speed, and drivers' age. Safety consequences and the design of future ACC systems based on drivers' adaptation to these factors are discussed.