Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Artem Burmyakov

dblp:121/2640 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-6787-0914ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling › multiprocessor scheduling
global scheduling
0.612022
Towards a Tractable Exact Test for Global Multiprocessor Fixed Priority Scheduling · IEEE Trans. Computers 2022
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling
0.612022
Towards a Tractable Exact Test for Global Multiprocessor Fixed Priority Scheduling · IEEE Trans. Computers 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

state-space pruning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Towards a Tractable Exact Test for Global Multiprocessor Fixed Priority Scheduling
abstract
Scheduling algorithms are called “global” if they can migrate tasks between cores. Global scheduling algorithms are the de-facto standard practice for general purpose Operating Systems, to balance the workload between cores. However, the exact schedulability analysis of real-time applications for these algorithms is proven to be weakly NP-hard. Despite such a hardness, the research community keeps investigating the methods for an exact schedulability analysis for its relevance and to tightly estimate the execution requirements of real-time systems. Due to the NP-hardness, the available exact tests are very time and memory demanding even for sets of a few tasks. On another hand, the available sufficient tests are very pessimistic, despite consuming less resources. Motivated by these observations, we propose an exact schedulability test for constrained-deadline sporadic tasks under global multiprocessor fixed-priority scheduling scheduler, which is significantly faster and consumes less memory, compared to any other available exact test. To derive a faster test, we exploit the idea of a state-space pruning, aiming at reducing the number of feasible system states to be examined by the test. The resulted test is multiple orders of magnitude faster with respect to other state-of-the-art exact tests. Our C++ implementation is publicly available.
Artem Burmyakov, Enrico Bini, Chang-Gun Lee
IEEE Trans. Computers1
2021 An exact comparison of global, partitioned, and semi-partitioned fixed-priority real-time multiprocessor schedulers
Artem Burmyakov, Borislav Nikolic
J. Syst. Archit.1
2014 Compositional multiprocessor scheduling: the GMPR interface
Artem Burmyakov, Enrico Bini, Eduardo Tovar
Real Time Syst.1