Background: Software migration across programming languages is a critical yet labor-intensive task, often requiring deep code understanding and manual intervention. Aims: In this study, we aim to develop a fully automated agent for end-to-end code translation and validation. Method: First, we generate code comments from Java source code using various large language models (LLMs) to enhance code comprehension and facilitate cross-language translation. Second, leveraging these AI-generated comments, we automatically generate equivalent C# code, demonstrating the potential of AI in software migration and interoperability. Third, we complete both Java and generated C# code and prepare them to execute. Fourth, we apply automated unit testing to assess functional correctness and ensure the reliability of AI-generated code. Results: Our results show that a fully automated LLM agent may effectively bridge programming languages with minimal human input. This approach opens new possibilities for scalable, AIdriven software modernization and cross-platform development. Conclusions: We recommend that such an LLM agent should be used to support human experts during the generation of reliable and correct code.

The goal of software metrics is the identification and measurement of the essential parameters that affect software development. Metrics can be used to improve software quality and productivity. Existing metrics in the literature are mostly product or process related. However, thought processes of people have a significant impact on software quality as software is designed, implemented and tested by people. Therefore, in defining new metrics, we need to take into account human cognitive aspects. Our research aims to address this need through the proposal of a new metric scheme to quantify a specific human cognitive aspect, namely "confirmation bias". In our previous research, in order to quantify confirmation bias, we defined a methodology to measure confirmation biases of people. In this research, we propose a metric suite that would be used by practitioners during daily decision making. Our proposed metric set consists of six metrics with a theoretical basis in cognitive psychology and measurement theory. Empirical sample of these metrics are collected from two software companies that are specialized in two different domains in order to demonstrate their feasibility. We suggest ways in which practitioners may use these metrics to improve software development process.

We present an integrated measurement and defect prediction tool: Dione. Our tool enables organizations to measure, monitor, and control product quality through learning based defect prediction. Similar existing tools either provide data collection and analytics, or work just as a prediction engine. Therefore, companies need to deal with multiple tools with incompatible interfaces in order to deploy a complete measurement and prediction solution. Dione provides a fully integrated solution where data extraction, defect prediction and reporting steps fit seamlessly. In this paper, we present the major functionality and architectural elements of Dione followed by an overview of our demonstration.