Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ajaykumar Kannan
dblp:121/3442
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Integrated circuit design · 42% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 38% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 20% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Integrated circuit design › packaging › advanced packaging
silicon interposer |
0.3 | 2 | 2015 | NoC Architectures for Silicon Interposer Systems: Why Pay for more Wires when you Can Get them (from your interposer) for Free? · MICRO 2014 Enabling interposer-based disintegration of multi-core processors · MICRO 2015 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
chip multiprocessor |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Enabling interposer-based disintegration of multi-core processors · MICRO 2015 |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › network-on-chip design
interposer-based noc |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Enabling interposer-based disintegration of multi-core processors · MICRO 2015 |
Integrated circuit design › packaging › advanced packaging
2.5d integration |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | NoC Architectures for Silicon Interposer Systems: Why Pay for more Wires when you Can Get them (from your interposer) for Free? · MICRO 2014 |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
network topology |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | NoC Architectures for Silicon Interposer Systems: Why Pay for more Wires when you Can Get them (from your interposer) for Free? · MICRO 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interposer routing · 0.2cost-performance trade-off analysis · 0.2point-to-point interconnect · 0.2concentration · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Enabling interposer-based disintegration of multi-core processorsabstractSilicon interposers enable the integration of multiple stacks of in-package memory to provide higher bandwidth or lower energy for memory accesses. Once the interposer has been paid for, there are new opportunities to exploit the interposer. Recent work considers using the routing resources of the interposer to improve the network-on-chip's (NoC) capabilities. In this work, we exploit the interposer to "disintegrate" a multi-core CPU chip into smaller chips that individually and collectively cost less to manufacture than a single large chip. However, this fragments the overall NoC, which decreases performance as core-to-core messages between chips must now route through the interposer. We study the performance-cost trade-offs of interposer based, multi-chip, multi-core systems and propose new interposer NoC organizations to mitigate the performance challenges while preserving the cost benefits. Ajaykumar Kannan, Natalie D. Enright Jerger, Gabriel H. Loh |
MICRO | 1 |
| 2014 | NoC Architectures for Silicon Interposer Systems: Why Pay for more Wires when you Can Get them (from your interposer) for Free?abstractSilicon interposer technology ("2.5D" stacking) enables the integration of multiple memory stacks with a processor chip, thereby greatly increasing in-package memory capacity while largely avoiding the thermal challenges of 3D stacking DRAM on the processor. Systems employing interposers for memory integration use the interposer to provide point-to-point interconnects between chips. However, these interconnects only utilize a fraction of the interposer's overall routing capacity, and in this work we explore how to take advantage of this otherwise unused resource. We describe a general approach for extending the architecture of a network-on-chip (NoC) to better exploit the additional routing resources of the silicon interposer. We propose an asymmetric organization that distributes the NoC across both a multi-core chip and the interposer, where each sub-network is different from the other in terms of the traffic types, topologies, the use or non-use of concentration, direct vs. Indirect network organizations, and other network attributes. Through experimental evaluation, we show that exploiting the otherwise unutilized routing resources of the interposer can lead to significantly better performance. Natalie D. Enright Jerger, Ajaykumar Kannan, Zimo Li, Gabriel H. Loh |
MICRO | 2 |