Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Simon R. F. Ashton

dblp:122/2920 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Learning theory · 25% Learning paradigms · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.112012
Learning curves for multi-task Gaussian process regression · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Learning theory
learning curves
0.112012
Learning curves for multi-task Gaussian process regression · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
multi-output gaussian process
0.112012
Learning curves for multi-task Gaussian process regression · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
0.112012
Learning curves for multi-task Gaussian process regression · NIPS 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

asymptotic analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Learning curves for multi-task Gaussian process regression
abstract
We study the average case performance of multi-task Gaussian process (GP) regression as captured in the learning curve, i.e.\ the average Bayes error for a chosen task versus the total number of examples $n$ for all tasks. For GP covariances that are the product of an input-dependent covariance function and a free-form inter-task covariance matrix, we show that accurate approximations for the learning curve can be obtained for an arbitrary number of tasks $T$. We use these to study the asymptotic learning behaviour for large $n$. Surprisingly, multi-task learning can be asymptotically essentially useless: examples from other tasks only help when the degree of inter-task correlation, $\rho$, is near its maximal value $\rho=1$. This effect is most extreme for learning of smooth target functions as described by e.g.\ squared exponential kernels. We also demonstrate that when learning {\em many} tasks, the learning curves separate into an initial phase, where the Bayes error on each task is reduced down to a plateau value by ``collective learning'' even though most tasks have not seen examples, and a final decay that occurs only once the number of examples is proportional to the number of tasks.
Peter Sollich, Simon R. F. Ashton
NIPS2