Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Saurabh Paul

dblp:122/2940 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
8as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 7 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 57% Data mining · 22% Query processing and optimization · 22%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-objective reinforcement learning
0.612022
Toward Pareto Efficient Fairness-Utility Trade-off in Recommendation through Reinforcement Learning · WSDM 2022
Recommender systems
fairness-aware recommendation
0.612022
Toward Pareto Efficient Fairness-Utility Trade-off in Recommendation through Reinforcement Learning · WSDM 2022
Query processing and optimization
adaptive sampling
0.212015
Column Selection via Adaptive Sampling · NIPS 2015
Data mining
data reduction
0.212015
Column Selection via Adaptive Sampling · NIPS 2015
Algorithms and data structures › matrix approximation
column subset selection
0.212015
Column Selection via Adaptive Sampling · NIPS 2015
Algorithms and data structures
numerical linear algebra
0.212015
Column Selection via Adaptive Sampling · NIPS 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep deterministic policy gradient · 1.1conditioned network · 1.1relative-error column selection · 0.4adaptive sampling · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Toward Pareto Efficient Fairness-Utility Trade-off in Recommendation through Reinforcement Learning
abstract
The issue of fairness in recommendation is becoming increasingly essential as Recommender Systems (RS) touch and influence more and more people in their daily lives. In fairness-aware recommendation, most of the existing algorithmic approaches mainly aim at solving a constrained optimization problem by imposing a constraint on the level of fairness while optimizing the main recommendation objective, e.g., click through rate (CTR). While this alleviates the impact of unfair recommendations, the expected return of an approach may significantly compromise the recommendation accuracy due to the inherent trade-off between fairness and utility. This motivates us to deal with these conflicting objectives and explore the optimal trade-off between them in recommendation. One conspicuous approach is to seek aPareto efficient/optimal solution to guarantee optimal compromises between utility and fairness. Moreover, considering the needs of real-world e-commerce platforms, it would be more desirable if we can generalize the wholePareto Frontier, so that the decision-makers can specify any preference of one objective over another based on their current business needs. Therefore, in this work, we propose a fairness-aware recommendation framework usingmulti-objective reinforcement learning (MORL), called MoFIR (pronounced "more fair ''), which is able to learn a single parametric representation for optimal recommendation policies over the space of all possible preferences. Specially, we modify traditional Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) by introducingconditioned network (CN) into it, which conditions the networks directly on these preferences and outputs Q-value-vectors. Experiments on several real-world recommendation datasets verify the superiority of our framework on both fairness metrics and recommendation measures when compared with all other baselines. We also extract the approximate Pareto Frontier on real-world datasets generated by MoFIR and compare to state-of-the-art fairness methods.
Yingqiang Ge, Xiaoting Zhao, Lucia Yu, Saurabh Paul, Diane Hu, Chu-Cheng Hsieh, Yongfeng Zhang 0003
WSDM4
2016 Feature Selection for Ridge Regression with Provable Guarantees
abstract
We introduce single-set spectral sparsification as a deterministic sampling-based feature selection technique for regularized least-squares classification, which is the classification analog to ridge regression. The method is unsupervised and gives worst-case guarantees of the generalization power of the classification function after feature selection with respect to the classification function obtained using all features. We also introduce leverage-score sampling as an unsupervised randomized feature selection method for ridge regression. We provide risk bounds for both single-set spectral sparsification and leverage-score sampling on ridge regression in the fixed design setting and show that the risk in the sampled space is comparable to the risk in the full-feature space. We perform experiments on synthetic and real-world data sets; a subset of TechTC-300 data sets, to support our theory. Experimental results indicate that the proposed methods perform better than the existing feature selection methods.
Saurabh Paul, Petros Drineas
Neural Comput.1
2016 Feature selection for linear SVM with provable guarantees
Saurabh Paul, Malik Magdon-Ismail, Petros Drineas
Pattern Recognit.1
2015 Feature Selection for Linear SVM with Provable Guarantees
abstract
We give two provably accurate feature-selection techniques for the linear SVM. The algorithms run in deterministic and randomized time respectively. Our algorithms can be used in an unsupervised or supervised setting. The supervised approach is based on sampling features from support vectors. We prove that the margin in the feature space is preserved to within ε-relative error of the margin in the full feature space in the worst-case. In the unsupervised setting, we also provide worst-case guarantees of the radius of the minimum enclosing ball, thereby ensuring comparable generalization as in the full feature space and resolving an open problem posed in Dasgupta et al. We present extensive experiments on real-world datasets to support our theory and to demonstrate that our methods are competitive and often better than prior state-of-the-art, for which there are no known provable guarantees.
Saurabh Paul, Malik Magdon-Ismail, Petros Drineas
AISTATS1
2015 Core-Sets For Canonical Correlation Analysis
abstract
Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) is a technique that finds how "similar" are the subspaces that are spanned by the columns of two different matrices A έℜ(of size m-x-n) and B έℜ(of size m-x-l). CCA measures similarity by means of the cosines of the so-called principal angles between the two subspaces. Those values are also known as canonical correlations of the matrix pair (A,B). In this work, we consider the over-constrained case where the number of rows is greater than the number of columns (m > max(n,l)). We study the problem of constructing "core-sets" for CCA. A core-set is a subset of rows from A and the corresponding subset of rows from B - denoted by  and B, respectively. A "good" core-set is a subset of rows such that the canonical correlations of the core-set (Â, B) are "close" to the canonical correlations of the original matrix pair (A, B). There is a natural tradeoff between the core-set size and the approximation accuracy of a core-set. We present two algorithms namely, single-set spectral sparsification and leverage-score sampling, which find core-sets with additive-error guarantees to canonical correlations.
Saurabh Paul
CIKM1
2015 Column Selection via Adaptive Sampling
abstract
Selecting a good column (or row) subset of massive data matrices has found many applications in data analysis and machine learning. We propose a new adaptive sampling algorithm that can be used to improve any relative-error column selection algorithm. Our algorithm delivers a tighter theoretical bound on the approximation error which we also demonstrate empirically using two well known relative-error column subset selection algorithms. Our experimental results on synthetic and real-world data show that our algorithm outperforms non-adaptive sampling as well as prior adaptive sampling approaches.
Saurabh Paul, Malik Magdon-Ismail, Petros Drineas
NIPS1
2014 Deterministic Feature Selection for Regularized Least Squares Classification
Saurabh Paul, Petros Drineas
ECML/PKDD (2)1
2014 Random Projections for Linear Support Vector Machines
abstract
Let X be a data matrix of rank ρ, whose rows represent n points in d -dimensional space. The linear support vector machine constructs a hyperplane separator that maximizes the 1-norm soft margin. We develop a new oblivious dimension reduction technique that is precomputed and can be applied to any input matrix X . We prove that, with high probability, the margin and minimum enclosing ball in the feature space are preserved to within ϵ-relative error, ensuring comparable generalization as in the original space in the case of classification. For regression, we show that the margin is preserved to ϵ-relative error with high probability. We present extensive experiments with real and synthetic data to support our theory.
Saurabh Paul, Christos Boutsidis, Malik Magdon-Ismail, Petros Drineas
ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data1
2013 Random Projections for Support Vector Machines
abstract
Let X be a data matrix of rank ρ, representing n points in d-dimensional space. The linear support vector machine constructs a hyperplane separator that maximizes the 1-norm soft margin. We develop a new oblivious dimension reduction technique which is precomputed and can be applied to any input matrix X. We prove that, with high probability, the margin and minimum enclosing ball in the feature space are preserved to within ε-relative error, ensuring comparable generalization as in the original space. We present extensive experiments with real and synthetic data to support our theory.
Saurabh Paul, Christos Boutsidis, Malik Magdon-Ismail, Petros Drineas
AISTATS1