Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kamiel Cornelissen

dblp:122/3039 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 6 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 44% Algorithms and data structures · 34% Computational complexity · 12%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › analysis of algorithms
smoothed analysis
0.422015
Smoothed Analysis of the Successive Shortest Path Algorithm · SIAM J. Comput. 2015
Smoothed Analysis of the Successive Shortest Path Algorithm · SODA 2013
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms › network flow
successive shortest path
0.422015
Smoothed Analysis of the Successive Shortest Path Algorithm · SIAM J. Comput. 2015
Smoothed Analysis of the Successive Shortest Path Algorithm · SODA 2013
Algorithms and data structures
analysis of algorithms
0.212015
Smoothed Analysis of the Successive Shortest Path Algorithm · SIAM J. Comput. 2015
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms › path problems
shortest path algorithms
0.212015
Smoothed Analysis of the Successive Shortest Path Algorithm · SIAM J. Comput. 2015
Computational complexity › complexity measures
smoothed complexity
0.212015
Smoothed Analysis of the Successive Shortest Path Algorithm · SIAM J. Comput. 2015
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.212013
Smoothed Analysis of the Successive Shortest Path Algorithm · SODA 2013
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms › network flow
minimum-cost flow
0.212013
Smoothed Analysis of the Successive Shortest Path Algorithm · SODA 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

smoothed analysis · 0.4perturbation analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Approximation Algorithms for Connected Graph Factors of Minimum Weight
abstract
Finding low-cost spanning subgraphs with given degree and connectivity requirements is a fundamental problem in the area of network design. We consider the problem of finding d-regular spanning subgraphs (or d-factors) of minimum weight with connectivity requirements. For the case of k-edge-connectedness, we present approximation algorithms that achieve constant approximation ratios for all d≥2⋅⌈k/2⌉. For the case of k-vertex-connectedness, we achieve constant approximation ratios for d≥2k−1. Our algorithms also work for arbitrary degree sequences if the minimum degree is at least 2⋅⌈k/2⌉ (for k-edge-connectivity) or 2k−1 (for k-vertex-connectivity). To complement our approximation algorithms, we prove that the problem with simple connectivity cannot be approximated better than the traveling salesman problem. In particular, the problem is A P X-hard.
Kamiel Cornelissen, Ruben Hoeksma, Bodo Manthey, N. S. Narayanaswamy, C. S. Rahul 0001, Marten Waanders
Theory Comput. Syst.1
2018 Belief propagation for the maximum-weight independent set and minimum spanning tree problems
Kamiel Cornelissen, Bodo Manthey
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2015 Smoothed Analysis of the Minimum-Mean Cycle Canceling Algorithm and the Network Simplex Algorithm
Kamiel Cornelissen, Bodo Manthey
COCOON1
2015 Smoothed Analysis of the Successive Shortest Path Algorithm
Tobias Brunsch, Kamiel Cornelissen, Bodo Manthey, Heiko Röglin, Clemens Rösner
SIAM J. Comput.2
2013 Smoothed Analysis of the Successive Shortest Path Algorithm
abstract
The minimum-cost flow problem is a classic problem in combinatorial optimization with various applications. Several pseudopolynomial, polynomial, and strongly polynomial algorithms have been developed in the past decades, and it seems that both the problem and the algorithms are well understood. However, some of the algorithms' running times observed in empirical studies contrast the running times obtained by worst-case analysis not only in the order of magnitude but also in the ranking when compared to each other. For example, the successive shortest path (SSP) algorithm, which has an exponential worst-case running time, seems to outperform the strongly polynomial minimum-mean cycle canceling algorithm. To explain this discrepancy, we study the SSP algorithm in the framework of smoothed analysis and establish a bound of $O(mn\phi)$ for the number of iterations, which implies a smoothed running time of $O(mn\phi (m + n\log n))$, where $n$ and $m$ denote the number of nodes and edges, respectively, and $\phi$ is a measure for the amount of random noise. This shows that worst-case instances for the SSP algorithm are not robust and unlikely to be encountered in practice. Furthermore, we prove a smoothed lower bound of $\Omega(m \cdot \min \{ n, \phi \} \cdot \phi)$ for the number of iterations of the SSP algorithm, showing that the upper bound cannot be improved for $\phi = \Omega(n)$.
Tobias Brunsch, Kamiel Cornelissen, Bodo Manthey, Heiko Röglin
SODA2
2013 Approximability of Connected Factors
Kamiel Cornelissen, Ruben Hoeksma, Bodo Manthey, N. S. Narayanaswamy, C. S. Rahul 0001
WAOA1