Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anudhyan Boral
dblp:122/3158
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 35% Generative modeling · 30% Representation and self-supervised learning · 15% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 64% Environmental and earth informatics · 21% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 44% Logic in computer science · 44% Automata and formal languages · 13% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional sampling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | User-defined Event Sampling and Uncertainty Quantification in Diffusion Models for Physical Dynamical Systems · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | User-defined Event Sampling and Uncertainty Quantification in Diffusion Models for Physical Dynamical Systems · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › dynamical system representation
latent dynamics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Evolve Smoothly, Fit Consistently: Learning Smooth Latent Dynamics For Advection-Dominated Systems · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural stochastic differential equations |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Ideal Large Eddy Simulation: Modeling Turbulence with Neural Stochastic Differential Equations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scientific machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Ideal Large Eddy Simulation: Modeling Turbulence with Neural Stochastic Differential Equations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | User-defined Event Sampling and Uncertainty Quantification in Diffusion Models for Physical Dynamical Systems · ICML 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › dynamical systems › nonlinear dynamics
chaotic dynamics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | User-defined Event Sampling and Uncertainty Quantification in Diffusion Models for Physical Dynamical Systems · ICML 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
computational fluid dynamics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Ideal Large Eddy Simulation: Modeling Turbulence with Neural Stochastic Differential Equations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › computational fluid dynamics
large eddy simulation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Ideal Large Eddy Simulation: Modeling Turbulence with Neural Stochastic Differential Equations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural population dynamics
latent dynamics inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Evolve Smoothly, Fit Consistently: Learning Smooth Latent Dynamics For Advection-Dominated Systems · ICLR 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
physics-informed machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Evolve Smoothly, Fit Consistently: Learning Smooth Latent Dynamics For Advection-Dominated Systems · ICLR 2023 |
Environmental and earth informatics › climate science
statistical downscaling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Debias Coarsely, Sample Conditionally: Statistical Downscaling through Optimal Transport and Probabilistic Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
encoder-decoder architecture |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Ideal Large Eddy Simulation: Modeling Turbulence with Neural Stochastic Differential Equations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Ideal Large Eddy Simulation: Modeling Turbulence with Neural Stochastic Differential Equations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Environmental and earth informatics
climate modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Debias Coarsely, Sample Conditionally: Statistical Downscaling through Optimal Transport and Probabilistic Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Model-Checking Parse Trees · LICS 2013 |
Logic in computer science › modal logic › dynamic logic
propositional dynamic logic |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Model-Checking Parse Trees · LICS 2013 |
Automata and formal languages › formal grammars
context-free grammar |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Model-Checking Parse Trees · LICS 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffusion model · 2.0probabilistic approximation · 1.3neural ordinary differential equation · 1.3neural SDE · 1.3latent variable model · 1.3latent dynamics · 1.3encoder-decoder · 1.3conditional score approximation · 1.3optimal transport · 0.7conditional sampling · 0.7parse trees · 0.2complexity analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Evolve Smoothly, Fit Consistently: Learning Smooth Latent Dynamics For Advection-Dominated Systems
Zhong Yi Wan, Leonardo Zepeda-Núñez, Anudhyan Boral, Fei Sha |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | User-defined Event Sampling and Uncertainty Quantification in Diffusion Models for Physical Dynamical SystemsabstractDiffusion models are a class of probabilistic generative models that have been widely used as a prior for image processing tasks like text conditional generation and inpainting. We demonstrate that these models can be adapted to make predictions and provide uncertainty quantification for chaotic dynamical systems. In these applications, diffusion models can implicitly represent knowledge about outliers and extreme events; however, querying that knowledge through conditional sampling or measuring probabilities is surprisingly difficult. Existing methods for conditional sampling at inference time seek mainly to enforce the constraints, which is insufficient to match the statistics of the distribution or compute the probability of the chosen events. To achieve these ends, optimally one would use the conditional score function, but its computation is typically intractable. In this work, we develop a probabilistic approximation scheme for the conditional score function which provably converges to the true distribution as the noise level decreases. With this scheme we are able to sample conditionally on nonlinear user-defined events at inference time, and matches data statistics even when sampling from the tails of the distribution. Marc Finzi, Anudhyan Boral, Andrew Gordon Wilson, Fei Sha, Leonardo Zepeda-Núñez |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Neural Ideal Large Eddy Simulation: Modeling Turbulence with Neural Stochastic Differential EquationsabstractWe introduce a data-driven learning framework that assimilates two powerful ideas: ideal large eddy simulation (LES) from turbulence closure modeling and neural stochastic differential equations (SDE) for stochastic modeling. The ideal LES models the LES flow by treating each full-order trajectory as a random realization of the underlying dynamics, as such, the effect of small-scales is marginalized to obtain the deterministic evolution of the LES state. However, ideal LES is analytically intractable. In our work, we use a latent neural SDE to model the evolution of the stochastic process and an encoder-decoder pair for transforming between the latent space and the desired ideal flow field. This stands in sharp contrast to other types of neural parameterization of closure models where each trajectory is treated as a deterministic realization of the dynamics. We show the effectiveness of our approach (niLES – neural ideal LES) on two challenging chaotic dynamical systems: Kolmogorov flow at a Reynolds number of 20,000 and flow past a cylinder at Reynolds number 500. Compared to competing methods, our method can handle non-uniform geometries using unstructured meshes seamlessly. In particular, niLES leads to trajectories with more accurate statistics and enhances stability, particularly for long-horizon rollouts. (Source codes and datasets will be made publicly available.) Anudhyan Boral, Zhong Yi Wan, Leonardo Zepeda-Núñez, James Lottes, Qing Wang 0032, Fei Sha |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Debias Coarsely, Sample Conditionally: Statistical Downscaling through Optimal Transport and Probabilistic Diffusion ModelsabstractWe introduce a two-stage probabilistic framework for statistical downscaling using unpaired data. Statistical downscaling seeks a probabilistic map to transform low-resolution data from a biased coarse-grained numerical scheme to high-resolution data that is consistent with a high-fidelity scheme. Our framework tackles the problem by
composing two transformations: (i) a debiasing step via an optimal transport map, and (ii) an upsampling step achieved by a probabilistic diffusion model with a posteriori conditional sampling. This approach characterizes a conditional distribution without needing paired data, and faithfully recovers relevant physical statistics from biased samples. We demonstrate the utility of the proposed approach on one- and two-dimensional fluid flow problems, which are representative of the core difficulties present in numerical simulations of weather and climate. Our method produces realistic high-resolution outputs from low-resolution inputs, by upsampling resolutions of $8\times$ and $16\times$. Moreover, our procedure correctly matches the statistics of physical quantities, even when the low-frequency content of the inputs and outputs do not match, a crucial but difficult-to-satisfy assumption needed by current state-of-the-art alternatives. Code for this work is available at: https://github.com/google-research/swirl-dynamics/tree/main/swirl_dynamics/projects/probabilistic_diffusion. Zhong Yi Wan, Ricardo Baptista, Anudhyan Boral, Fei Sha, Leonardo Zepeda-Núñez |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2016 | A Fast Branching Algorithm for Cluster Vertex DeletionabstractIn the family of clustering problems we are given a set of objects (vertices of the graph), together with some observed pairwise similarities (edges). The goal is to identify clusters of similar objects by slightly modifying the graph to obtain a cluster graph (disjoint union of cliques). Hüffner et al. (Theory Comput. Syst. 47(1), 196–217, 2010) initiated the parameterized study of Cluster Vertex Deletion, where the allowed modification is vertex deletion, and presented an elegant $\mathcal {O}\left (\min (2^{k} k^{6} \log k + n^{3}, 2^{k} km\sqrt {n} \log n)\right )$ -time fixed-parameter algorithm, parameterized by the solution size. In the last 5 years, this algorithm remained the fastest known algorithm for Cluster Vertex Deletion and, thanks to its simplicity, became one of the textbook examples of an application of the iterative compression principle. In our work we break the 2 k -barrier for Cluster Vertex Deletion and present an $\mathcal {O}(1.9102^{k} (n+m))$ -time branching algorithm. We achieve this improvement by a number of structural observations which we incorporate into the algorithm’s branching steps. Anudhyan Boral, Marek Cygan, Tomasz Kociumaka, Marcin Pilipczuk |
Theory Comput. Syst. | 1 |
| 2013 | Model-Checking Parse TreesabstractParse trees are fundamental syntactic structures in both computational linguistics and programming language design. We argue in this paper that, in both fields, there are good incentives for model-checking sets of parse trees for some word according to a context-free grammar. We put forward the adequacy of propositional dynamic logic (PDL) on trees in these applications, and study as a sanity check the complexity of the corresponding model-checking problem: although complete for exponential time in the general case, we find natural restrictions on grammars for our applications and establish complexities ranging from nondeterministic polynomial time to polynomial space in the relevant cases. Anudhyan Boral, Sylvain Schmitz |
LICS | 1 |