Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexandru Craciun 0001
dblp:122/8652-1
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-6029-1290ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
gradient descent dynamics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Non-Singularity of the Gradient Descent Map for Neural Networks with Piecewise Analytic Activations · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Non-Singularity of the Gradient Descent Map for Neural Networks with Piecewise Analytic Activations · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Non-Singularity of the Gradient Descent Map for Neural Networks with Piecewise Analytic Activations · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
piecewise analytic activation analysis · 0.9measure theory · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Non-Singularity of the Gradient Descent Map for Neural Networks with Piecewise Analytic ActivationsabstractThe theory of training deep networks has become a central question of modern machine learning and has inspired many practical advancements. In particular, the gradient descent (GD) optimization algorithm has been extensively studied in recent years. A key assumption about GD has appeared in several recent works: the \emph{GD map is non-singular} --- it preserves sets of measure zero under preimages. Crucially, this assumption has been used to prove that GD avoids saddle points and maxima, and to establish the existence of a computable quantity that determines the convergence to global minima (both for GD and stochastic GD). However, the current literature either assumes the non-singularity of the GD map or imposes restrictive assumptions, such as Lipschitz smoothness of the loss (for example, Lipschitzness does not hold for deep ReLU networks with the cross-entropy loss) and restricts the analysis to GD with small step-sizes. In this paper, we investigate the neural network map as a function on the space of weights and biases. We also prove, for the first time, the non-singularity of the gradient descent (GD) map on the loss landscape of realistic neural network architectures (with fully connected, convolutional, or softmax attention layers) and piecewise analytic activations (which includes sigmoid, ReLU, leaky ReLU, etc.) for almost all step-sizes. Our work significantly extends the existing results on the convergence of GD and SGD by guaranteeing that they apply to practical neural network settings and has the potential to unlock further exploration of learning dynamics. Alexandru Craciun 0001, Debarghya Ghoshdastidar |
NeurIPS | 1 |