Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jim Braux-Zin

dblp:122/8720 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
displacement estimation
0.212013
A General Dense Image Matching Framework Combining Direct and Feature-Based Costs · ICCV 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric estimation › registration
non-rigid registration
0.212013
A General Dense Image Matching Framework Combining Direct and Feature-Based Costs · ICCV 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow
0.212013
A General Dense Image Matching Framework Combining Direct and Feature-Based Costs · ICCV 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › multi-view stereo
stereo reconstruction
0.212013
A General Dense Image Matching Framework Combining Direct and Feature-Based Costs · ICCV 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric estimation › 3d registration
surface registration
0.212013
A General Dense Image Matching Framework Combining Direct and Feature-Based Costs · ICCV 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision › stereo matching
wide-baseline stereo
0.212013
A General Dense Image Matching Framework Combining Direct and Feature-Based Costs · ICCV 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

total generalized variation · 0.2feature-based matching · 0.2AD-Census · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 EasyFlow: increasing the convergence basin of variational image matching with a feature-based cost
abstract
Dense motion field estimation is a key computer vision problem. Many solutions have been proposed to compute small or large displacements, narrow or wide baseline stereo disparity, or non‐rigid surface registration, but a unified methodology is still lacking. The authors introduce a general framework that robustly combines direct and feature‐based matching. The feature‐based cost is built around a novel robust distance function that handles keypoints and weak features such as segments. It allows us to use putative feature matches to guide dense motion estimation out of local minima. The authors’ framework uses a robust direct data term. It is implemented with a powerful second‐order regularisation with external and self‐occlusion reasoning. Their framework achieves state‐of‐the‐art performance in several cases (standard optical flow benchmarks, wide‐baseline stereo and non‐rigid surface registration). Their framework has a modular design that customises to specific application needs.
Jim Braux-Zin, Romain Dupont, Adrien Bartoli, Mohamed Tamaazousti
IET Comput. Vis.1
2013 Combining Features and Intensity for Wide-Baseline Non-Rigid Surface Registration
abstract
International audience
Jim Braux-Zin, Romain Dupont, Adrien Bartoli
BMVC1
2013 A General Dense Image Matching Framework Combining Direct and Feature-Based Costs
abstract
Dense motion field estimation (typically optical flow, stereo disparity and surface registration) is a key computer vision problem. Many solutions have been proposed to compute small or large displacements, narrow or wide baseline stereo disparity, but a unified methodology is still lacking. We here introduce a general framework that robustly combines direct and feature-based matching. The feature-based cost is built around a novel robust distance function that handles key points and ``weak'' features such as segments. It allows us to use putative feature matches which may contain mismatches to guide dense motion estimation out of local minima. Our framework uses a robust direct data term (AD-Census). It is implemented with a powerful second order Total Generalized Variation regularization with external and self-occlusion reasoning. Our framework achieves state of the art performance in several cases (standard optical flow benchmarks, wide-baseline stereo and non-rigid surface registration). Our framework has a modular design that customizes to specific application needs.
Jim Braux-Zin, Romain Dupont, Adrien Bartoli
ICCV1