Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Genki Terashi
dblp:122/8797
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-5339-909XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Protein contact map refinement for improving structure prediction using generative adversarial networks · Bioinform. 2021 Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Enhancing cryo-EM maps with 3D deep generative networks for assisting protein structure modeling · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
residue contact prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Protein contact map refinement for improving structure prediction using generative adversarial networks · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction › protein-protein docking
docking model quality assessment |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein complex structure prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein-protein docking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks · Bioinform. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
3d generative adversarial network · 0.7generative adversarial network · 0.5voxel-based representation · 0.43d convolutional neural network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Enhancing cryo-EM maps with 3D deep generative networks for assisting protein structure modelingabstractMOTIVATION: The tertiary structures of an increasing number of biological macromolecules have been determined using cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). However, there are still many cases where the resolution is not high enough to model the molecular structures with standard computational tools. If the resolution obtained is near the empirical borderline (3-4.5 Å), improvement in the map quality facilitates structure modeling. RESULTS: We report EM-GAN, a novel approach that modifies an input cryo-EM map to assist protein structure modeling. The method uses a 3D generative adversarial network (GAN) that has been trained on high- and low-resolution density maps to learn the density patterns, and modifies the input map to enhance its suitability for modeling. The method was tested extensively on a dataset of 65 EM maps in the resolution range of 3-6 Å and showed substantial improvements in structure modeling using popular protein structure modeling tools. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/kiharalab/EM-GAN, Google Colab: https://tinyurl.com/3ccxpttx. Sai Raghavendra Maddhuri Venkata Subramaniya, Genki Terashi, Daisuke Kihara |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2021 | Protein contact map refinement for improving structure prediction using generative adversarial networksabstractMOTIVATION: Protein structure prediction remains as one of the most important problems in computational biology and biophysics. In the past few years, protein residue-residue contact prediction has undergone substantial improvement, which has made it a critical driving force for successful protein structure prediction. Boosting the accuracy of contact predictions has, therefore, become the forefront of protein structure prediction. RESULTS: We show a novel contact map refinement method, ContactGAN, which uses Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN). ContactGAN was able to make a significant improvement over predictions made by recent contact prediction methods when tested on three datasets including protein structure modeling targets in CASP13 and CASP14. We show improvement of precision in contact prediction, which translated into improvement in the accuracy of protein tertiary structure models. On the other hand, observed improvement over trRosetta was relatively small, reasons for which are discussed. ContactGAN will be a valuable addition in the structure prediction pipeline to achieve an extra gain in contact prediction accuracy. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/kiharalab/ContactGAN. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Sai Raghavendra Maddhuri Venkata Subramaniya, Genki Terashi, Aashish Jain, Yuki Kagaya, Daisuke Kihara |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2020 | Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networksabstractMOTIVATION: Many important cellular processes involve physical interactions of proteins. Therefore, determining protein quaternary structures provide critical insights for understanding molecular mechanisms of functions of the complexes. To complement experimental methods, many computational methods have been developed to predict structures of protein complexes. One of the challenges in computational protein complex structure prediction is to identify near-native models from a large pool of generated models. RESULTS: We developed a convolutional deep neural network-based approach named DOcking decoy selection with Voxel-based deep neural nEtwork (DOVE) for evaluating protein docking models. To evaluate a protein docking model, DOVE scans the protein-protein interface of the model with a 3D voxel and considers atomic interaction types and their energetic contributions as input features applied to the neural network. The deep learning models were trained and validated on docking models available in the ZDock and DockGround databases. Among the different combinations of features tested, almost all outperformed existing scoring functions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Codes available at http://github.com/kiharalab/DOVE, http://kiharalab.org/dove/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Xiao Wang 0013, Genki Terashi, Charles Christoffer, Daisuke Kihara |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2020 | SHREC 2020: Multi-domain protein shape retrieval challenge
Florent Langenfeld, Yuxu Peng, Yukun Lai, Paul L. Rosin, Tunde Aderinwale, Genki Terashi, Charles Christoffer, Daisuke Kihara, Halim Benhabiles, Karim Hammoudi, Adnane Cabani, Féryal Windal, Mahmoud Melkemi, Andrea Giachetti 0001, Stelios K. Mylonas, Apostolos Axenopoulos, Petros Daras, Ekpo Otu, Matthieu Montès |
Comput. Graph. | 6 |
| 2018 | Modeling the assembly order of multimeric heteroprotein complexesabstractProtein-protein interactions are the cornerstone of numerous biological processes. Although an increasing number of protein complex structures have been determined using experimental methods, relatively fewer studies have been performed to determine the assembly order of complexes. In addition to the insights into the molecular mechanisms of biological function provided by the structure of a complex, knowing the assembly order is important for understanding the process of complex formation. Assembly order is also practically useful for constructing subcomplexes as a step toward solving the entire complex experimentally, designing artificial protein complexes, and developing drugs that interrupt a critical step in the complex assembly. There are several experimental methods for determining the assembly order of complexes; however, these techniques are resource-intensive. Here, we present a computational method that predicts the assembly order of protein complexes by building the complex structure. The method, named Path-LzerD, uses a multimeric protein docking algorithm that assembles a protein complex structure from individual subunit structures and predicts assembly order by observing the simulated assembly process of the complex. Benchmarked on a dataset of complexes with experimental evidence of assembly order, Path-LZerD was successful in predicting the assembly pathway for the majority of the cases. Moreover, when compared with a simple approach that infers the assembly path from the buried surface area of subunits in the native complex, Path-LZerD has the strong advantage that it can be used for cases where the complex structure is not known. The path prediction accuracy decreased when starting from unbound monomers, particularly for larger complexes of five or more subunits, for which only a part of the assembly path was correctly identified. As the first method of its kind, Path-LZerD opens a new area of computational protein structure modeling and will be an indispensable approach for studying protein complexes. Lenna X. Peterson, Yoichiro Togawa, Juan Esquivel-Rodríguez, Genki Terashi, Charles Christoffer, Amitava Roy, Woong-Hee Shin, Daisuke Kihara |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 4 |
| 2017 | Modeling disordered protein interactions from biophysical principlesabstractDisordered protein-protein interactions (PPIs), those involving a folded protein and an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP), are prevalent in the cell, including important signaling and regulatory pathways. IDPs do not adopt a single dominant structure in isolation but often become ordered upon binding. To aid understanding of the molecular mechanisms of disordered PPIs, it is crucial to obtain the tertiary structure of the PPIs. However, experimental methods have difficulty in solving disordered PPIs and existing protein-protein and protein-peptide docking methods are not able to model them. Here we present a novel computational method, IDP-LZerD, which models the conformation of a disordered PPI by considering the biophysical binding mechanism of an IDP to a structured protein, whereby a local segment of the IDP initiates the interaction and subsequently the remaining IDP regions explore and coalesce around the initial binding site. On a dataset of 22 disordered PPIs with IDPs up to 69 amino acids, successful predictions were made for 21 bound and 18 unbound receptors. The successful modeling provides additional support for biophysical principles. Moreover, the new technique significantly expands the capability of protein structure modeling and provides crucial insights into the molecular mechanisms of disordered PPIs. Lenna X. Peterson, Amitava Roy, Charles Christoffer, Genki Terashi, Daisuke Kihara |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 4 |