Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hock Peng Chan
dblp:122/8981
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information theory › hypothesis testing
change-point detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Likelihood Scores for Sparse Signal and Change-Point Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023 |
Information theory › hypothesis testing
likelihood ratio test |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Likelihood Scores for Sparse Signal and Change-Point Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023 |
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse signal detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Likelihood Scores for Sparse Signal and Change-Point Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023 |
Information theory
hypothesis testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Likelihood Scores for Sparse Signal and Change-Point Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
soft-thresholding · 0.7likelihood ratio test · 0.7large deviation analysis · 0.7hard thresholding · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Likelihood Scores for Sparse Signal and Change-Point DetectionabstractWe consider here the identification of change-points on large-scale data streams. The objective is to find the most efficient way of combining information across data stream so that detection is possible under the smallest detectable change magnitude. The challenge comes from the sparsity of change-points when only a small fraction of data streams undergo change at any point in time. The most successful approach to the sparsity issue so far has been the application of hard thresholding such that only local scores from data streams exhibiting significant changes are considered and added. However the identification of an optimal threshold is a difficult one. In particular it is unlikely that the same threshold is optimal for different levels of sparsity. We propose here a sparse likelihood score for identifying a sparse signal. The score is a likelihood ratio for testing between the null hypothesis of no change against an alternative hypothesis in which the change-points or signals are barely detectable. By the Neyman-Pearson Lemma this score has maximum detection power at the given alternative. The outcome is that we have a scoring of data streams that is successful in detecting at the boundary of the detectable region of signals and change-points. The likelihood score can be seen as a soft thresholding approach to sparse signal and change-point detection in which local scores that indicate small changes are down-weighted much more than local scores indicating large changes. We are able to show sharp optimality of the sparsity likelihood score in the sense of achieving successful detection at the minimum detectable order of change magnitude as well as the best constant with respect this order of change. Shouri Hu, Jingyan Huang, Hao Chen 0064, Hock Peng Chan |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 4 |