Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Linus Gasser
dblp:122/9716
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0009-0000-5112-8969ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 5Computer networks · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
6 papers |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 39% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 38% Systems and software security · 10% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
6 papers |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems
consensus |
0.7 | 3 | 2018 | OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via Sharding · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2018 Enhancing Bitcoin Security and Performance with Strong Consistency via Collective Signing · USENIX Security Symposium 2016 CHAINIAC: Proactive Software-Update Transparency via Collectively Signed Skipchains and Verified Builds · USENIX Security Symposium 2017 |
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
byzantine fault tolerance |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via Sharding · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2018 Scalable Bias-Resistant Distributed Randomness · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2017 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | CALYPSO: Private Data Management for Decentralized Ledgers · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Distributed systems › distributed database
distributed ledger |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | CALYPSO: Private Data Management for Decentralized Ledgers · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Distributed systems › blockchain
permissionless blockchain |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | CALYPSO: Private Data Management for Decentralized Ledgers · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › blockchain scalability
sharding |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via Sharding · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2018 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
distributed randomness |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Scalable Bias-Resistant Distributed Randomness · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2017 |
Systems and software security › software supply chain security
software update security |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | CHAINIAC: Proactive Software-Update Transparency via Collectively Signed Skipchains and Verified Builds · USENIX Security Symposium 2017 |
Distributed systems › distributed algorithms › distributed randomness
distributed randomness beacon |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Scalable Bias-Resistant Distributed Randomness · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2017 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Keeping Authorities "Honest or Bust" with Decentralized Witness Cosigning · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › authenticated data structure
transparency log |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Keeping Authorities "Honest or Bust" with Decentralized Witness Cosigning · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016 |
Distributed systems › consistency models
strong consistency |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Enhancing Bitcoin Security and Performance with Strong Consistency via Collective Signing · USENIX Security Symposium 2016 |
Privacy and data protection › anonymity
traceable anonymity |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | CALYPSO: Private Data Management for Decentralized Ledgers · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
decentralized systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Scalable Bias-Resistant Distributed Randomness · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2017 |
Distributed systems › consensus
scalable consensus |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Keeping Authorities "Honest or Bust" with Decentralized Witness Cosigning · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
secret sharing · 1.4incentive scheme · 0.9sharding · 0.7cross-shard commit protocol · 0.7verified builds · 0.6verifiable random function · 0.6skipchains · 0.6signature aggregation · 0.5multisignature aggregation · 0.5collective signing · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | CALYPSO: Private Data Management for Decentralized LedgersabstractDistributed ledgers provide high availability and integrity , making them a key enabler for practical and secure computation of distributed workloads among mutually distrustful parties. Many practical applications also require strong confidentiality , however. This work enhances permissioned and permissionless blockchains with the ability to manage confidential data without forfeiting availability or decentralization. The proposed Calypso architecture addresses two orthogonal challenges confronting modern distributed ledgers: (a) enabling the auditable management of secrets and (b) protecting distributed computations against arbitrage attacks when their results depend on the ordering and secrecy of inputs. Calypso introduces on-chain secrets, a novel abstraction that enforces atomic deposition of an auditable trace whenever users access confidential data. Calypso provides user-controlled consent management that ensures revocation atomicity and accountable anonymity. To enable permissionless deployment, we introduce an incentive scheme and provide users with the option to select their preferred trustees. We evaluated our Calypso prototype with a confidential document-sharing application and a decentralized lottery. Our benchmarks show that transaction-processing latency increases linearly in terms of security (number of trustees) and is in the range of 0.2 to 8 seconds for 16 to 128 trustees. Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Enis Ceyhun Alp, Linus Gasser, Philipp Jovanovic, Ewa Syta, Bryan Ford |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 3 |
| 2018 | OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via ShardingabstractDesigning a secure permissionless distributed ledger (blockchain) that performs on par with centralized payment processors, such as Visa, is a challenging task. Most existing distributed ledgers are unable to scale-out, i.e., to grow their total processing capacity with the number of validators; and those that do, compromise security or decentralization. We present OmniLedger, a novel scale-out distributed ledger that preserves longterm security under permissionless operation. It ensures security and correctness by using a bias-resistant public-randomness protocol for choosing large, statistically representative shards that process transactions, and by introducing an efficient cross-shard commit protocol that atomically handles transactions affecting multiple shards. OmniLedger also optimizes performance via parallel intra-shard transaction processing, ledger pruning via collectively-signed state blocks, and low-latency "trust-but-verify" validation for low-value transactions. An evaluation of our experimental prototype shows that OmniLedger's throughput scales linearly in the number of active validators, supporting Visa-level workloads and beyond, while confirming typical transactions in under two seconds. Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Linus Gasser, Nicolas Gailly, Ewa Syta, Bryan Ford |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 3 |
| 2017 | Scalable Bias-Resistant Distributed RandomnessabstractBias-resistant public randomness is a critical component in many (distributed) protocols. Generating public randomness is hard, however, because active adversaries may behave dishonestly to bias public random choices toward their advantage. Existing solutions do not scale to hundreds or thousands of participants, as is needed in many decentralized systems. We propose two large-scale distributed protocols, RandHound and RandHerd, which provide publicly-verifiable, unpredictable, and unbiasable randomness against Byzantine adversaries. RandHound relies on an untrusted client to divide a set of randomness servers into groups for scalability, and it depends on the pigeonhole principle to ensure output integrity, even for non-random, adversarial group choices. RandHerd implements an efficient, decentralized randomness beacon. RandHerd is structurally similar to a BFT protocol, but uses RandHound in a one-time setup to arrange participants into verifiably unbiased random secret-sharing groups, which then repeatedly produce random output at predefined intervals. Our prototype demonstrates that RandHound and RandHerd achieve good performance across hundreds of participants while retaining a low failure probability by properly selecting protocol parameters, such as a group size and secret-sharing threshold. For example, when sharding 512 nodes into groups of 32, our experiments show that RandHound can produce fresh random output after 240 seconds. RandHerd, after a setup phase of 260 seconds, is able to generate fresh random output in intervals of approximately 6 seconds. For this configuration, both protocols operate at a failure probability of at most 0.08% against a Byzantine adversary. Ewa Syta, Philipp Jovanovic, Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Nicolas Gailly, Linus Gasser, Ismail Khoffi, Michael J. Fischer, Bryan Ford |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 5 |
| 2017 | CHAINIAC: Proactive Software-Update Transparency via Collectively Signed Skipchains and Verified Builds
Kirill Nikitin 0001, Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Nicolas Gailly, Linus Gasser, Ismail Khoffi, Justin Cappos, Bryan Ford |
USENIX Security Symposium | 5 |
| 2016 | Keeping Authorities "Honest or Bust" with Decentralized Witness CosigningabstractThe secret keys of critical network authorities -- such as time, name, certificate, and software update services -- represent high-value targets for hackers, criminals, and spy agencies wishing to use these keys secretly to compromise other hosts. To protect authorities and their clients proactively from undetected exploits and misuse, we introduce CoSi, a scalable witness cosigning protocol ensuring that every authoritative statement is validated and publicly logged by a diverse group of witnesses before any client will accept it. A statement S collectively signed by W witnesses assures clients that S has been seen, and not immediately found erroneous, by those W observers. Even if S is compromised in a fashion not readily detectable by the witnesses, CoSi still guarantees S's exposure to public scrutiny, forcing secrecy-minded attackers to risk that the compromise will soon be detected by one of the W witnesses. Because clients can verify collective signatures efficiently without communication, CoSi protects clients' privacy, and offers the first transparency mechanism effective against persistent man-in-the-middle attackers who control a victim's Internet access, the authority's secret key, and several witnesses' secret keys. CoSi builds on existing cryptographic multisignature methods, scaling them to support thousands of witnesses via signature aggregation over efficient communication trees. A working prototype demonstrates CoSi in the context of timestamping and logging authorities, enabling groups of over 8,000 distributed witnesses to cosign authoritative statements in under two seconds. Ewa Syta, Iulia Tamas, Dylan Visher, David Wolinsky, Philipp Jovanovic, Linus Gasser, Nicolas Gailly, Ismail Khoffi, Bryan Ford |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 6 |
| 2016 | Enhancing Bitcoin Security and Performance with Strong Consistency via Collective Signing
Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Nicolas Gailly, Ismail Khoffi, Linus Gasser, Bryan Ford |
USENIX Security Symposium | 5 |
| 2005 | Software-defined radio implementation of multiple antenna systems using low-density parity-check codesabstractThis paper presents the implementation of a multiple antenna communication system using low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes on the software-defined radio (SDR) platform developed at EPFL's Mobile Communications Laboratory. After briefly presenting the general structure and the main capabilities of our SR platform, we describe the methods and algorithms used for designing, encoding and decoding the LDPC codes for MIMO (multiple input multiple output) systems. We have implemented MIMO LDPC systems with up to four transmit and four receive antennas and performed on-the-air measurements which show strong agreement with the theory. Nicolae Chiurtu, Linus Gasser, Philippe Roud, Bixio Rimoldi |
WCNC | 2 |