Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chih Hu
dblp:123/0900
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Autonomous driving · 67% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Autonomous driving › autonomous vehicle testing
closed-loop evaluation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SimNet: Learning Reactive Self-driving Simulations from Real-world Observations · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › simulation
driving simulation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SimNet: Learning Reactive Self-driving Simulations from Real-world Observations · ICRA 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
planning evaluation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SimNet: Learning Reactive Self-driving Simulations from Real-world Observations · ICRA 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
markov process · 0.5deep neural network · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | SimNet: Learning Reactive Self-driving Simulations from Real-world ObservationsabstractIn this work we present a simple end-to-end trainable machine learning system capable of realistically simulating driving experiences. This can be used for verification of self-driving system performance without relying on expensive and time-consuming road testing. In particular, we frame the simulation problem as a Markov Process, leveraging deep neural networks to model both state distribution and transition function. These are trainable directly from the existing raw observations without the need of any handcrafting in the form of plant or kinematic models. All that is needed is a dataset of historical traffic episodes. Our formulation allows the system to construct never seen scenes that unfold realistically reacting to the self-driving car’s behaviour. We train our system directly from 1,000 hours of driving logs and measure both realism, reactivity of the simulation as the two key properties of the simulation. At the same time we apply the method to evaluate performance of a recently proposed state-of-the-art ML planning system [1] trained from human driving logs. We discover this planning system is prone to previously unreported causal confusion issues that are difficult to test by non-reactive simulation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that directly merges highly realistic data-driven simulations with a closed loop evaluation for self-driving vehicles. We make the data, code, and pre-trained models publicly available to further stimulate simulation development. Luca Bergamini, Yawei Ye, Oliver Scheel, Chih Hu, Luca Del Pero, Blazej Osinski, Hugo Grimmett, Peter Ondruska |
ICRA | 5 |