Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Max Taylor

dblp:123/1264 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-7873-9694ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Programming languages and type systems · 63% Program analysis · 37%
Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security
information flow control
0.812024
Cocoon: Static Information Flow Control in Rust · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024
Program analysis
static analysis
0.612022
SA4U: Practical Static Analysis for Unit Type Error Detection · ASE 2022
Programming languages and type systems › computational effects
effect systems
0.212024
Cocoon: Static Information Flow Control in Rust · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

type system · 1.5procedural macros · 1.5trace analysis · 1.1protocol analysis · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Cocoon: Static Information Flow Control in Rust
abstract
Information flow control (IFC) provides confidentiality by enforcing noninterference, which ensures that high-secrecy values cannot affect low-secrecy values. Prior work introduces fine-grained IFC approaches that modify the programming language and use non-standard compilation tools, impose run-time overhead, or report false secrecy leaks—all of which hinder adoption. This paper presents Cocoon, a Rust library for static type-based IFC that uses the unmodified Rust language and compiler. The key insight of Cocoon lies in leveraging Rust’s type system and procedural macros to establish an effect system that enforces noninterference. A performance evaluation shows that using Cocoon increases compile time but has no impact on application performance. To demonstrate Cocoon’s utility, we retrofitted two popular Rust programs, the Spotify TUI client and Mozilla’s Servo browser engine, to use Cocoon to enforce limited confidentiality policies
Ada Lamba, Max Taylor, Vincent Beardsley, Jacob Bambeck, Michael D. Bond, Zhiqiang Lin 0001
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.2
2022 SA4U: Practical Static Analysis for Unit Type Error Detection
abstract
Unit type errors, where values with physical unit types (e.g., meters, hours) are used incorrectly in a computation, are common in today’s unmanned aerial system (UAS) firmware. Recent studies show that unit type errors represent over 10% of bugs in UAS firmware. Moreover, the consequences of unit type errors are severe. Over 30% of unit type errors cause UAS crashes. This paper proposes SA4U: a practical system for detecting unit type errors in real-world UAS firmware. SA4U requires no modifications to firmware or developer annotations. It deduces the unit types of program variables by analyzing simulation traces and protocol definitions. SA4U uses the deduced unit types to identify when unit type errors occur. SA4U is effective: it identified 14 previously undetected bugs in two popular open-source firmware (ArduPilot & PX4.)
Max Taylor, Johnathon Aurand, Brandon Henry, Xiangyu Zhang 0001
ASE1
2021 Avis: In-Situ Model Checking for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
abstract
Control firmware in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) uses sensors to model and manage flight operations, from takeoff to landing to flying between waypoints. However, sensors can fail at any time during a flight. If control firmware mishandles sensor failures, UAVs can crash, fly away, or suffer other unsafe conditions. In-situ model checking finds sensor failures that could lead to unsafe conditions by systematically failing sensors. However, the type of sensor failure and its timing within a flight affect its manifestation, creating a large search space. We propose Avis, an in-situ model checker to quickly uncover UAV sensor failures that lead to unsafe conditions. Avis exploits operating modes, i.e., a label that maps software execution to corresponding flight operations. Widely used control firmware already support operating modes. Avis injects sensor failures as the control firmware transitions between modes - a key execution point where mishandled software exceptions can trigger unsafe conditions. We implemented Avis and applied it to ArduPilot and PX4. Avis found unsafe conditions 2.4X faster than Bayesian Fault Injection, the leading, state-of-theart approach. Within the current code base of ArduPilot and PX4, Avis discovered 10 previously unknown software bugs that lead to unsafe conditions. Additionally, we reinserted 5 known bugs that caused serious, unsafe conditions and Avis correctly reported all of them.
Max Taylor, Haicheng Chen, Christopher Stewart
DSN1
2012 Corrigendum to "Social networking as a nexus for engagement and exploitation of young people" [Inform Secur Tech Rep 16 (2) (2011) 44-50]
Ethel Quayle, Max Taylor
Inf. Secur. Tech. Rep.2
2011 Social networking as a nexus for engagement and exploitation of young people
Ethel Quayle, Max Taylor
Inf. Secur. Tech. Rep.2