EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Francesca Bacci
dblp:123/2896
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 50% Visualization and visual analytics · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
affective computing |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | In the eye of the beholder: employing statistical analysis and eye tracking for analyzing abstract paintings · ACM Multimedia 2012 |
Visualization and visual analytics
eye tracking analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | In the eye of the beholder: employing statistical analysis and eye tracking for analyzing abstract paintings · ACM Multimedia 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical analysis · 0.1eye tracking · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | In the eye of the beholder: employing statistical analysis and eye tracking for analyzing abstract paintingsabstractMost artworks are explicitly created to evoke a strong emotional response. During the centuries there were several art movements which employed different techniques to achieve emotional expressions conveyed by artworks. Yet people were always consistently able to read the emotional messages even from the most abstract paintings. Can a machine learn what makes an artwork emotional? In this work, we consider a set of 500 abstract paintings from Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto (MART), where each painting was scored as carrying a positive or negative response on a Likert scale of 1-7. We employ a state-of-the-art recognition system to learn which statistical patterns are associated with positive and negative emotions. Additionally, we dissect the classification machinery to determine which parts of an image evokes what emotions. This opens new opportunities to research why a specific painting is perceived as emotional. We also demonstrate how quantification of evidence for positive and negative emotions can be used to predict the way in which people observe paintings. Victoria Yanulevskaya, Jasper R. R. Uijlings, Elia Bruni, Andreza Sartori, Elisa Zamboni, Francesca Bacci, David Melcher, Nicu Sebe |
ACM Multimedia | 6 |