Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mathew Garnett

dblp:123/4520 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.522018
GDSCTools for mining pharmacogenomic interactions in cancer · Bioinform. 2018
Fast randomization of large genomic datasets while preserving alteration counts · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
pharmacogenomics
0.312018
GDSCTools for mining pharmacogenomic interactions in cancer · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
mutual exclusivity analysis
0.212014
Fast randomization of large genomic datasets while preserving alteration counts · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics
0.112014
Fast randomization of large genomic datasets while preserving alteration counts · Bioinform. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

elastic net · 0.3analysis of variance · 0.3switching-algorithm · 0.2monte carlo method · 0.2bipartite network · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 GDSCTools for mining pharmacogenomic interactions in cancer
abstract
Motivation: Large pharmacogenomic screenings integrate heterogeneous cancer genomic datasets as well as anti-cancer drug responses on thousand human cancer cell lines. Mining this data to identify new therapies for cancer sub-populations would benefit from common data structures, modular computational biology tools and user-friendly interfaces. Results: We have developed GDSCTools: a software aimed at the identification of clinically relevant genomic markers of drug response. The Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database (www.cancerRxgene.org) integrates heterogeneous cancer genomic datasets as well as anti-cancer drug responses on a thousand cancer cell lines. Including statistical tools (analysis of variance) and predictive methods (Elastic Net), as well as common data structures, GDSCTools allows users to reproduce published results from GDSC and to implement new analytical methods. In addition, non-GDSC data resources can also be analysed since drug responses and genomic features can be encoded as CSV files. Contact: [email protected] or saezrodriguez.rwth-aachen.de or [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Thomas Cokelaer, Elisabeth Chen, Francesco Iorio, Michael P. Menden, Howard Lightfoot, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Mathew Garnett
Bioinform.7
2014 Fast randomization of large genomic datasets while preserving alteration counts
abstract
MOTIVATION: Studying combinatorial patterns in cancer genomic datasets has recently emerged as a tool for identifying novel cancer driver networks. Approaches have been devised to quantify, for example, the tendency of a set of genes to be mutated in a 'mutually exclusive' manner. The significance of the proposed metrics is usually evaluated by computing P-values under appropriate null models. To this end, a Monte Carlo method (the switching-algorithm) is used to sample simulated datasets under a null model that preserves patient- and gene-wise mutation rates. In this method, a genomic dataset is represented as a bipartite network, to which Markov chain updates (switching-steps) are applied. These steps modify the network topology, and a minimal number of them must be executed to draw simulated datasets independently under the null model. This number has previously been deducted empirically to be a linear function of the total number of variants, making this process computationally expensive. RESULTS: We present a novel approximate lower bound for the number of switching-steps, derived analytically. Additionally, we have developed the R package BiRewire, including new efficient implementations of the switching-algorithm. We illustrate the performances of BiRewire by applying it to large real cancer genomics datasets. We report vast reductions in time requirement, with respect to existing implementations/bounds and equivalent P-value computations. Thus, we propose BiRewire to study statistical properties in genomic datasets, and other data that can be modeled as bipartite networks. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: BiRewire is available on BioConductor at http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.13/bioc/html/BiRewire.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Andrea Gobbi, Francesco Iorio, Kevin J. Dawson, David C. Wedge, David Tamborero, Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Núria López-Bigas, Mathew Garnett, Giuseppe Jurman, Julio Saez-Rodriguez
Bioinform.8