Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mathew Garnett
dblp:123/4520
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.5 | 2 | 2018 | GDSCTools for mining pharmacogenomic interactions in cancer · Bioinform. 2018 Fast randomization of large genomic datasets while preserving alteration counts · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
pharmacogenomics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | GDSCTools for mining pharmacogenomic interactions in cancer · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
mutual exclusivity analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Fast randomization of large genomic datasets while preserving alteration counts · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Fast randomization of large genomic datasets while preserving alteration counts · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
elastic net · 0.3analysis of variance · 0.3switching-algorithm · 0.2monte carlo method · 0.2bipartite network · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | GDSCTools for mining pharmacogenomic interactions in cancerabstractMotivation: Large pharmacogenomic screenings integrate heterogeneous cancer genomic datasets as well as anti-cancer drug responses on thousand human cancer cell lines. Mining this data to identify new therapies for cancer sub-populations would benefit from common data structures, modular computational biology tools and user-friendly interfaces. Results: We have developed GDSCTools: a software aimed at the identification of clinically relevant genomic markers of drug response. The Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database (www.cancerRxgene.org) integrates heterogeneous cancer genomic datasets as well as anti-cancer drug responses on a thousand cancer cell lines. Including statistical tools (analysis of variance) and predictive methods (Elastic Net), as well as common data structures, GDSCTools allows users to reproduce published results from GDSC and to implement new analytical methods. In addition, non-GDSC data resources can also be analysed since drug responses and genomic features can be encoded as CSV files. Contact: [email protected] or saezrodriguez.rwth-aachen.de or [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Thomas Cokelaer, Elisabeth Chen, Francesco Iorio, Michael P. Menden, Howard Lightfoot, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Mathew Garnett |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2014 | Fast randomization of large genomic datasets while preserving alteration countsabstractMOTIVATION: Studying combinatorial patterns in cancer genomic datasets has recently emerged as a tool for identifying novel cancer driver networks. Approaches have been devised to quantify, for example, the tendency of a set of genes to be mutated in a 'mutually exclusive' manner. The significance of the proposed metrics is usually evaluated by computing P-values under appropriate null models. To this end, a Monte Carlo method (the switching-algorithm) is used to sample simulated datasets under a null model that preserves patient- and gene-wise mutation rates. In this method, a genomic dataset is represented as a bipartite network, to which Markov chain updates (switching-steps) are applied. These steps modify the network topology, and a minimal number of them must be executed to draw simulated datasets independently under the null model. This number has previously been deducted empirically to be a linear function of the total number of variants, making this process computationally expensive. RESULTS: We present a novel approximate lower bound for the number of switching-steps, derived analytically. Additionally, we have developed the R package BiRewire, including new efficient implementations of the switching-algorithm. We illustrate the performances of BiRewire by applying it to large real cancer genomics datasets. We report vast reductions in time requirement, with respect to existing implementations/bounds and equivalent P-value computations. Thus, we propose BiRewire to study statistical properties in genomic datasets, and other data that can be modeled as bipartite networks. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: BiRewire is available on BioConductor at http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.13/bioc/html/BiRewire.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Andrea Gobbi, Francesco Iorio, Kevin J. Dawson, David C. Wedge, David Tamborero, Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Núria López-Bigas, Mathew Garnett, Giuseppe Jurman, Julio Saez-Rodriguez |
Bioinform. | 8 |