Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Fabian Latorre

dblp:123/4557 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
6as first author
7since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Optimization for machine learning · 23% Learning theory · 16%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 25 heaviest of 28, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
1.532024
Adversarial Training Should Be Cast as a Non-Zero-Sum Game · ICLR 2024
Finding Actual Descent Directions for Adversarial Training · ICLR 2023
Efficient Proximal Mapping of the 1-path-norm of Shallow Networks · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training
1.422024
Adversarial Training Should Be Cast as a Non-Zero-Sum Game · ICLR 2024
Finding Actual Descent Directions for Adversarial Training · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.022022
Controlling the Complexity and Lipschitz Constant improves Polynomial Nets · ICLR 2022
Lipschitz constant estimation of Neural Networks via sparse polynomial optimization · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
bilevel optimization
0.812024
Improving SAM Requires Rethinking its Optimization Formulation · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
robust overfitting
0.812024
Adversarial Training Should Be Cast as a Non-Zero-Sum Game · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
sharpness-aware minimization
0.812024
Improving SAM Requires Rethinking its Optimization Formulation · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network › multilayer neural network
polynomial neural networks
0.612022
Controlling the Complexity and Lipschitz Constant improves Polynomial Nets · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.512021
The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic Classifiers · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning
intrinsic dimension
0.512021
The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic Classifiers · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
rademacher complexity
0.512021
The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic Classifiers · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.512021
The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic Classifiers · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › certified robustness
lipschitz constant estimation
0.412020
Lipschitz constant estimation of Neural Networks via sparse polynomial optimization · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
neural network regularization
0.412020
Efficient Proximal Mapping of the 1-path-norm of Shallow Networks · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › norm-based regularization
path norm regularization
0.412020
Efficient Proximal Mapping of the 1-path-norm of Shallow Networks · ICML 2020
Mathematical optimization › global optimization
polynomial optimization
0.412020
Lipschitz constant estimation of Neural Networks via sparse polynomial optimization · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
alternating direction method of multipliers
0.412019
Fast and Provable ADMM for Learning with Generative Priors · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory
compressed sensing
0.412019
Fast and Provable ADMM for Learning with Generative Priors · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.412019
Fast and Provable ADMM for Learning with Generative Priors · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative prior
0.412019
Fast and Provable ADMM for Learning with Generative Priors · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization
0.412019
Fast and Provable ADMM for Learning with Generative Priors · NeurIPS 2019
Mathematical optimization › constrained optimization
augmented lagrangian method
0.412019
An Inexact Augmented Lagrangian Framework for Nonconvex Optimization with Nonlinear Constraints · NeurIPS 2019
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
non-convex constrained optimization
0.412019
An Inexact Augmented Lagrangian Framework for Nonconvex Optimization with Nonlinear Constraints · NeurIPS 2019
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
0.412019
An Inexact Augmented Lagrangian Framework for Nonconvex Optimization with Nonlinear Constraints · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory
lipschitz constant
0.112020
Efficient Proximal Mapping of the 1-path-norm of Shallow Networks · ICML 2020
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.112019
An Inexact Augmented Lagrangian Framework for Nonconvex Optimization with Nonlinear Constraints · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse polynomial optimization · 0.9surrogate loss · 0.8non-zero-sum game formulation · 0.8bi-level optimization · 0.80-1 loss relaxation · 0.8polynomial networks · 0.6lipschitz constant analysis · 0.6rademacher complexity analysis · 0.5nuclear-norm constraint · 0.5proximal gradient · 0.4second-order oracle · 0.4first-order oracle · 0.4augmented lagrangian · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Adversarial Training Should Be Cast as a Non-Zero-Sum Game
abstract
One prominent approach toward resolving the adversarial vulnerability of deep neural networks is the two-player zero-sum paradigm of adversarial training, in which predictors are trained against adversarially chosen perturbations of data. Despite the promise of this approach, algorithms based on this paradigm have not engendered sufficient levels of robustness and suffer from pathological behavior like robust overfitting. To understand this shortcoming, we first show that the commonly used surrogate-based relaxation used in adversarial training algorithms voids all guarantees on the robustness of trained classifiers. The identification of this pitfall informs a novel non-zero-sum bilevel formulation of adversarial training, wherein each player optimizes a different objective function. Our formulation yields a simple algorithmic framework that matches and in some cases outperforms state-of-the-art attacks, attains comparable levels of robustness to standard adversarial training algorithms, and does not suffer from robust overfitting.
Alexander Robey, Fabian Latorre, George J. Pappas, Seyed Hamed Hassani, Volkan Cevher
ICLR2
2024 Improving SAM Requires Rethinking its Optimization Formulation
abstract
This paper rethinks Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM), which is originally formulated as a zero-sum game where the weights of a network and a bounded perturbation try to minimize/maximize, respectively, the same differentiable loss. To fundamentally improve this design, we argue that SAM should instead be reformulated using the 0-1 loss. As a continuous relaxation, we follow the simple conventional approach where the minimizing (maximizing) player uses an upper bound (lower bound) surrogate to the 0-1 loss. This leads to a novel formulation of SAM as a bilevel optimization problem, dubbed as BiSAM. BiSAM with newly designed lower-bound surrogate loss indeed constructs stronger perturbation. Through numerical evidence, we show that BiSAM consistently results in improved performance when compared to the original SAM and variants, while enjoying similar computational complexity. Our code is available at https://github.com/LIONS-EPFL/BiSAM.
Wanyun Xie, Fabian Latorre, Kimon Antonakopoulos, Thomas Pethick, Volkan Cevher
ICML2
2023 OTW: Optimal Transport Warping for Time Series
abstract
Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) has become the pragmatic choice for measuring distance between time series. However, it suffers from unavoidable quadratic time complexity when the optimal alignment matrix needs to be computed exactly. This hinders its use in deep learning architectures, where layers involving DTW computations cause severe bottlenecks. To alleviate these issues, we introduce a new metric for time series data based on the Optimal Transport (OT) framework, called Optimal Transport Warping (OTW). OTW enjoys linear time/space complexity, is differentiable and can be parallelized. OTW enjoys a moderate sensitivity to time and shape distortions, making it ideal for time series. We show the efficacy and efficiency of OTW on 1-Nearest Neighbor Classification and Hierarchical Clustering, as well as in the case of using OTW instead of DTW in Deep Learning architectures.
Fabian Latorre, Doyen Sahoo, Steven C. H. Hoi
ICASSP1
2023 Finding Actual Descent Directions for Adversarial Training
Fabian Latorre, Igor Krawczuk, Leello Tadesse Dadi, Thomas Pethick, Volkan Cevher
ICLR1
2022 Controlling the Complexity and Lipschitz Constant improves Polynomial Nets
Fabian Latorre, Grigorios Chrysos 0002, Volkan Cevher
ICLR2
2021 A Plug-and-Play Deep Image Prior
abstract
Deep image priors (DIP) offer a novel approach for the regularization that leverages the inductive bias of a deep convolutional architecture in inverse problems. However, the quality of DIP approaches often degrades when the number of iterations exceeds a certain threshold due to overfitting. To mitigate this effect, this work incorporates a plug-and-play prior scheme which can accommodate additional regularization steps within a DIP framework. Our modification is achieved using an augmented Lagrangian formulation of the problem, and is solved using an Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) variant, which can capture existing DIP approaches as a special case. We show experimentally that our ADMM-based DIP pairing outperforms competitive baselines in PSNR while exhibiting less overfitting.
Zhaodong Sun, Fabian Latorre, Thomas Sanchez, Volkan Cevher
ICASSP2
2021 The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic Classifiers
abstract
It has been recently observed that neural networks, unlike kernel methods, enjoy a reduced sample complexity when the distribution is isotropic (i.e., when the covariance matrix is the identity). We find that this sensitivity to the data distribution is not exclusive to neural networks, and the same phenomenon can be observed on the class of quadratic classifiers (i.e., the sign of a quadratic polynomial) with a nuclear-norm constraint. We demonstrate this by deriving an upper bound on the Rademacher Complexity that depends on two key quantities: (i) the intrinsic dimension, which is a measure of isotropy, and (ii) the largest eigenvalue of the second moment (covariance) matrix of the distribution. Our result improves the dependence on the dimension over the best previously known bound and precisely quantifies the relation between the sample complexity and the level of isotropy of the distribution.
Fabian Latorre, Leello Tadesse Dadi, Paul Rolland, Volkan Cevher
NeurIPS1
2020 Lipschitz constant estimation of Neural Networks via sparse polynomial optimization
Fabian Latorre, Paul Rolland, Volkan Cevher
ICLR1
2020 Efficient Proximal Mapping of the 1-path-norm of Shallow Networks
abstract
We demonstrate two new important properties of the 1-path-norm of shallow neural networks. First, despite its non-smoothness and non-convexity it allows a closed form proximal operator which can be efficiently computed, allowing the use of stochastic proximal-gradient-type methods for regularized empirical risk minimization. Second, when the activation functions is differentiable, it provides an upper bound on the Lipschitz constant of the network. Such bound is tighter than the trivial layer-wise product of Lipschitz constants, motivating its use for training networks robust to adversarial perturbations. In practical experiments we illustrate the advantages of using the proximal mapping and we compare the robustness-accuracy trade-off induced by the 1-path-norm, L1-norm and layer-wise constraints on the Lipschitz constant (Parseval networks).
Fabian Latorre, Paul Rolland, Nadav Hallak, Volkan Cevher
ICML1
2019 Fast and Provable ADMM for Learning with Generative Priors
abstract
In this work, we propose a (linearized) Alternating Direction Method-of-Multipliers (ADMM) algorithm for minimizing a convex function subject to a nonconvex constraint. We focus on the special case where such constraint arises from the specification that a variable should lie in the range of a neural network. This is motivated by recent successful applications of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) in tasks like compressive sensing, denoising and robustness against adversarial examples. The derived rates for our algorithm are characterized in terms of certain geometric properties of the generator network, which we show hold for feedforward architectures, under mild assumptions. Unlike gradient descent (GD), it can efficiently handle non-smooth objectives as well as exploit efficient partial minimization procedures, thus being faster in many practical scenarios.
Fabian Latorre, Armin Eftekhari, Volkan Cevher
NeurIPS1
2019 An Inexact Augmented Lagrangian Framework for Nonconvex Optimization with Nonlinear Constraints
abstract
We propose a practical inexact augmented Lagrangian method (iALM) for nonconvex problems with nonlinear constraints. We characterize the total computational complexity of our method subject to a verifiable geometric condition, which is closely related to the Polyak-Lojasiewicz and Mangasarian-Fromowitz conditions. In particular, when a first-order solver is used for the inner iterates, we prove that iALM finds a first-order stationary point with $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/\epsilon^3)$ calls to the first-order oracle. {If, in addition, the problem is smooth and} a second-order solver is used for the inner iterates, iALM finds a second-order stationary point with $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/\epsilon^5)$ calls to the second-order oracle. These complexity results match the known theoretical results in the literature. We also provide strong numerical evidence on large-scale machine learning problems, including the Burer-Monteiro factorization of semidefinite programs, and a novel nonconvex relaxation of the standard basis pursuit template. For these examples, we also show how to verify our geometric condition.
Mehmet Fatih Sahin, Armin Eftekhari, Ahmet Alacaoglu, Fabian Latorre, Volkan Cevher
NeurIPS4