Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Merrick McCracken

dblp:123/4706 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Wireless sensing and localization · 44% Internet of things and sensor networks · 28% Physical-layer communications · 28%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › channel modeling › channel characterization
channel impulse response
0.212014
Hidden Markov Estimation of Bistatic Range From Cluttered Ultra-Wideband Impulse Responses · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2014
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
target detection and tracking
0.212014
Hidden Markov Estimation of Bistatic Range From Cluttered Ultra-Wideband Impulse Responses · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2014
Wireless sensing and localization › radar sensing
ultra-wideband radar
0.212014
Hidden Markov Estimation of Bistatic Range From Cluttered Ultra-Wideband Impulse Responses · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2014
Wireless sensing and localization
indoor localization
0.112014
Hidden Markov Estimation of Bistatic Range From Cluttered Ultra-Wideband Impulse Responses · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2014
Wireless sensing and localization
multipath mitigation
0.112014
Hidden Markov Estimation of Bistatic Range From Cluttered Ultra-Wideband Impulse Responses · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hidden markov model · 0.2baum-welch algorithm · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Hidden Markov Estimation of Bistatic Range From Cluttered Ultra-Wideband Impulse Responses
abstract
Ultra-wideband (UWB) multistatic radar can be used for target detection and tracking in buildings and rooms. Target detection and tracking relies on accurate knowledge of the bistatic delay. Noise, measurement error, and the problem of dense, overlapping multipath signals in the measured UWB channel impulse response (CIR) all contribute to make bistatic delay estimation challenging. It is often assumed that a calibration CIR, that is, a measurement from when no person is present, is easily subtracted from a newly captured CIR. We show this is often not the case. We propose modeling the difference between a current set of CIRs and a set of calibration CIRs as a hidden Markov model (HMM). Multiple experimental deployments are performed to collect CIR data and test the performance of this model and compare its performance to existing methods. Our experimental results show an RMSE of 2.85 ns and 2.76 ns for our HMM-based approach, compared to a thresholding method which, if the ideal threshold is known a priori, achieves 3.28 ns and 4.58 ns. By using the Baum-Welch algorithm, the HMM-based estimator is shown to be very robust to initial parameter settings. Localization performance is also improved using the HMM-based bistatic delay estimates.
Merrick McCracken, Neal Patwari
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.1
2013 Joint ultra-wideband and signal strength-based through-building tracking for tactical operations
abstract
Accurate device free localization (DFL) based on received signal strength (RSS) measurements requires placement of radio transceivers on all sides of the target area. Accuracy degrades dramatically if sensors do not surround the area. However, law enforcement officers sometimes face situations where it is not possible or practical to place sensors on all sides of the target room or building. For example, for an armed subject barricaded in a motel room, police may be able to place sensors in adjacent rooms, but not in front of the room, where the subject would see them. In this paper, we show that using two ultra-wideband (UWB) impulse radios, in addition to multiple RSS sensors, improves the localization accuracy, particularly on the axis where no sensors are placed (which we call the x-axis). We introduce three methods for combining the RSS and UWB data. By using UWB radios together with RSS sensors, it is still possible to localize a person through walls even when the devices are placed only on two sides of the target area. Including the data from the UWB radios can reduce the localization area of uncertainty by more than 60%.
Merrick McCracken, Maurizio Bocca, Neal Patwari
SECON1