Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nora Bayani

dblp:123/6048 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0009-0008-7809-7822ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology › kinetic modeling
biochemical kinetics modeling
0.212014
Causal network inference using biochemical kinetics · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
causal network inference
0.212014
Causal network inference using biochemical kinetics · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology
network inference
0.212014
Causal network inference using biochemical kinetics · Bioinform. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

chemical reaction kinetics · 0.2bayesian inference · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Causal network inference using biochemical kinetics
abstract
MOTIVATION: Networks are widely used as structural summaries of biochemical systems. Statistical estimation of networks is usually based on linear or discrete models. However, the dynamics of biochemical systems are generally non-linear, suggesting that suitable non-linear formulations may offer gains with respect to causal network inference and aid in associated prediction problems. RESULTS: We present a general framework for network inference and dynamical prediction using time course data that is rooted in non-linear biochemical kinetics. This is achieved by considering a dynamical system based on a chemical reaction graph with associated kinetic parameters. Both the graph and kinetic parameters are treated as unknown; inference is carried out within a Bayesian framework. This allows prediction of dynamical behavior even when the underlying reaction graph itself is unknown or uncertain. Results, based on (i) data simulated from a mechanistic model of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and (ii) phosphoproteomic data from cancer cell lines, demonstrate that non-linear formulations can yield gains in causal network inference and permit dynamical prediction and uncertainty quantification in the challenging setting where the reaction graph is unknown. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: MATLAB R2014a software is available to download from warwick.ac.uk/chrisoates. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Chris J. Oates, Frank Dondelinger, Nora Bayani, James Korkola, Joe W. Gray, Sach Mukherjee
Bioinform.3
2012 Integrating biological knowledge into variable selection: an empirical Bayes approach with an application in cancer biology
abstract
BACKGROUND: An important question in the analysis of biochemical data is that of identifying subsets of molecular variables that may jointly influence a biological response. Statistical variable selection methods have been widely used for this purpose. In many settings, it may be important to incorporate ancillary biological information concerning the variables of interest. Pathway and network maps are one example of a source of such information. However, although ancillary information is increasingly available, it is not always clear how it should be used nor how it should be weighted in relation to primary data. RESULTS: We put forward an approach in which biological knowledge is incorporated using informative prior distributions over variable subsets, with prior information selected and weighted in an automated, objective manner using an empirical Bayes formulation. We employ continuous, linear models with interaction terms and exploit biochemically-motivated sparsity constraints to permit exact inference. We show an example of priors for pathway- and network-based information and illustrate our proposed method on both synthetic response data and by an application to cancer drug response data. Comparisons are also made to alternative Bayesian and frequentist penalised-likelihood methods for incorporating network-based information. CONCLUSIONS: The empirical Bayes method proposed here can aid prior elicitation for Bayesian variable selection studies and help to guard against mis-specification of priors. Empirical Bayes, together with the proposed pathway-based priors, results in an approach with a competitive variable selection performance. In addition, the overall procedure is fast, deterministic, and has very few user-set parameters, yet is capable of capturing interplay between molecular players. The approach presented is general and readily applicable in any setting with multiple sources of biological prior knowledge.
Steven M. Hill, Richard M. Neve, Nora Bayani, Wen-Lin Kuo, Safiyyah Ziyad, Paul T. Spellman, Joe W. Gray, Sach Mukherjee
BMC Bioinform.3