Parallel elastic actuators (PEAs) have shown the abilto reduce the energy consumption of robots. However, regular PEAs do not allow us to freely choose at which instant or configuration to store or release energy. This paper introduces the concept and design of the bidirectional clutched parallel elastic actuator (BIC-PEA), which reduces the energy consumption of robots by loading and unloading a parallel spring with controlled timing and direction. The concept of the BIC-PEA consists of a spring that mounted between the two outgoing axes of a differential mechanism. Those axes can also be locked to the ground by two locking mechanisms. At any position, the BIC-PEA can store the kinetic energy of a joint in the spring such that the joint is decelerated zero velocity. The spring energy can then be released, accelerating joint in any desired direction. Such functionality is suitable for robots that perform rest-to-rest motions, such as pick-and-place robots or intermittently moving belts. The main body of our prototype weighs 202 g and fits in a cylinder with a length of 51 mm and a diameter of 45 mm. This excludes the size and weight nonoptimized clutches, which would approximately triple the total volume and weight. In the results, we also omit the energy consumption of the clutches. The BIC-PEA can store 0.77 J and a peak torque of 1.5 N·m. Simulations show that the energy consumption of our one-degree-of-freedom setup can be reduced 73%. In hardware experiments, we reached peak reductions 65% and a reduction of 53% in a realistic task, which is larger than all other concepts with the same functionality.

Parallel elastic actuators (PEAs) have shown the ability to reduce the energy consumption of robots. The problem with regular PEAs is that it is not possible to freely choose at which instant or configuration to store or release energy. This paper introduces the concept and the design of the Bi-directional Clutched Parallel Elastic Actuator (BIC-PEA*), which reduces the energy consumption of robots by loading and unloading the parallel spring in a controlled manner. The concept of the BIC-PEA consists of a spring that is mounted between the two outgoing axes of a differential mechanism. Those axes can also be locked to the ground by two locking mechanisms. At any position, the BIC-PEA can store the kinetic energy of a joint in the spring such that the joint is decelerated to zero velocity. The spring energy can then be released, accelerating the joint in any desired direction. In our prototype of 202 g, the energy that can be stored in the spring is 0.77 J. When disengaged, the friction that the mechanism adds is negligible. The current maximum over-all efficiency is 62 %, which is about 55% more than what generally can be achieved by recapturing the energy electrically. Its relatively high efficiency and controllability make the BIC-PEA a promising concept for reducing the energy consumption of robots.

High feedback gains cannot be used on all robots due to sensor noise, time delays or interaction with humans. The problem with low feedback gain controlled robots is that the accuracy of the task execution is potentially low. In this paper we investigate if trajectory optimization of feedback-feedforward controlled robots improves their accuracy. For rest-to-rest motions, we find the optimal trajectory indirectly by numerically optimizing the corresponding feedforward controller for accuracy. A new performance measure called the Manipulation Sensitivity Norm (MSN) is introduced that determines the accuracy under most disturbances and modeling errors. We tested this method on a two DOF robotic arm in the horizontal plane. The results show that for all feedback gains we tested, the choice for the trajectory has a significant influence on the accuracy of the arm (viz. position errors being reduced from 2.5 cm to 0.3 cm). Moreover, to study which features of feedforward controllers cause high or low accuracy, four more feedforward controllers were tested. Results from those experiments indicate that a trajectory that is smooth or quickly approaches the goal position will be accurate.

Most conventional robotic arms depend on sensory feedback to perform their tasks. When feedback is inaccurate, slow or otherwise unreliable, robots should behave more like humans: rely on feedforward instead. This paper presents an approach to perform repetitive tasks with robotic arms, without the need for feedback (i.e. the control is open loop). The cyclic motions of the repetitive tasks are analyzed using an approach similar to limit cycle theory. We optimize open loop control signals that result in open loop stable motions. This approach to manipulator control was implemented on a two DOF arm in the horizontal plane with a spring on the first DOF, of which we show simulation and hardware results. The results show that both in simulation and in hardware experiments, it is possible to create open loop stable cycles. However, the two resulting cycles are different due to model inaccuracies. We also show simulation and hardware results for an inverted pendulum, of which we have a more accurate model. These results show stable cycles that are the same in simulation and hardware experiments.

Learning can be used to optimize robot motions to new situations. Learning motions can cause high frequency random motions in the exploration phase and can cause failure before the motion is learned. The mean time between failures (MTBF) of a robot can be predicted while it is performing these motions. The predicted MTBF in the exploration phase can be increased by filtering actions or possible actions of the algorithm. We investigated five algorithms that apply this filtering in various ways and compared them to SARSA(λ) learning. In general, increasing the MTBF decreases the learning performance. Three of the investigated algorithms are unable to increase the MTBF while keeping their learning performance approximately equal to SARSA(λ). Two algorithms are able to do this: the PADA algorithm and the low-pass filter algorithm. In case of LEO, a bipedal walking robot that tries to optimize a walking motion, the MTBF can be increased by a factor of 108 compared to SARSA(λ). This indicates that, in some cases, failures due to high frequency random motions can be prevented without decreasing the performance.

The common view on feedforward control is that it needs an accurate model in order to accurately predict a future state of the system. However, in this paper we show that there are model inaccuracies that do not affect the final position of a motion, when using the right feedforward controller. Having an accurate final position is the main requirement in the task we consider: a pick-and-place task. We optimized the feedforward controllers such that the effect of model inaccuracies on the final position was minimized. The system we studied is a one DOF robotic arm in the horizontal plane, of which we show simulation and hardware results. The results show that the errors in the final position can be reduced to approximately zero for an inaccurate Coulomb, viscous or torque dependent friction. Furthermore, errors in the final position can be reduced, but not to zero, for an inaccurate inertia or motor constant. In conclusion, we show that for certain model inaccuracies, no feedback is required to eliminate the effect of an inaccurate model on the final position of a motion.

Most conventional robotic arms use motors to accelerate the manipulator. This leads to an unnecessary high energy consumption when performing repetitive tasks. This paper presents an approach to reduce energy consumption in robotic arms by performing its repetitive tasks with the help of a parallel spring mechanism. A special non-linear spring characteristic has been achieved by attaching a spring to two connected pulleys. This parallel spring mechanism provides for the accelerations of the manipulator without compromising its ability to vary the task parameters (the time per stroke, the displacement per stroke the grasping time and the payload). The energy consumption of the arm with the spring mechanism is compared to that of the same arm without the spring mechanism. Optimal control studies show that the robotic arm uses 22% less energy due to the spring mechanism. On the 2 DOF prototype, we achieved an energy reduction of 20%. The difference was due to model simplifications. With a spring mechanism, there is an extra energetic cost, because potential energy has to be stored into the spring during startup. This cost is equal to the total energy savings of the 2 DOF arm during 8 strokes. Next, there could have been an energetic cost to position the manipulator outside the equilibrium position. We have designed the spring mechanism in such a way that this holding cost is negligible for a range of start- and end positions. The performed experiments showed that the implementation of the proposed spring mechanism results in a reduction of the energy consumption while the arm is still able to handle varying task parameters.