Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ruben L. Gonzalez

dblp:123/7014 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-1344-5581ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
hidden markov model
0.212013
Hierarchically-coupled hidden Markov models for learning kinetic rates from single-molecule data · ICML (2) 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.212013
Hierarchically-coupled hidden Markov models for learning kinetic rates from single-molecule data · ICML (2) 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology › parameter estimation
kinetic rate estimation
0.212013
Hierarchically-coupled hidden Markov models for learning kinetic rates from single-molecule data · ICML (2) 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational bayes · 0.3hierarchical coupled HMM · 0.3expectation-maximization · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Single-molecule dataset (SMD): a generalized storage format for raw and processed single-molecule data
abstract
BACKGROUND: Single-molecule techniques have emerged as incisive approaches for addressing a wide range of questions arising in contemporary biological research [Trends Biochem Sci 38:30-37, 2013; Nat Rev Genet 14:9-22, 2013; Curr Opin Struct Biol 2014, 28C:112-121; Annu Rev Biophys 43:19-39, 2014]. The analysis and interpretation of raw single-molecule data benefits greatly from the ongoing development of sophisticated statistical analysis tools that enable accurate inference at the low signal-to-noise ratios frequently associated with these measurements. While a number of groups have released analysis toolkits as open source software [J Phys Chem B 114:5386-5403, 2010; Biophys J 79:1915-1927, 2000; Biophys J 91:1941-1951, 2006; Biophys J 79:1928-1944, 2000; Biophys J 86:4015-4029, 2004; Biophys J 97:3196-3205, 2009; PLoS One 7:e30024, 2012; BMC Bioinformatics 288 11(8):S2, 2010; Biophys J 106:1327-1337, 2014; Proc Int Conf Mach Learn 28:361-369, 2013], it remains difficult to compare analysis for experiments performed in different labs due to a lack of standardization. RESULTS: Here we propose a standardized single-molecule dataset (SMD) file format. SMD is designed to accommodate a wide variety of computer programming languages, single-molecule techniques, and analysis strategies. To facilitate adoption of this format we have made two existing data analysis packages that are used for single-molecule analysis compatible with this format. CONCLUSION: Adoption of a common, standard data file format for sharing raw single-molecule data and analysis outcomes is a critical step for the emerging and powerful single-molecule field, which will benefit both sophisticated users and non-specialists by allowing standardized, transparent, and reproducible analysis practices.
Max Greenfeld, Jan-Willem van de Meent, Dmitri S. Pavlichin, Hideo Mabuchi, Chris Wiggins 0001, Ruben L. Gonzalez, Daniel Herschlag
BMC Bioinform.6
2013 Hierarchically-coupled hidden Markov models for learning kinetic rates from single-molecule data
abstract
We address the problem of analyzing sets of noisy time-varying signals that all report on the same process but confound straightforward analyses due to complex inter-signal heterogeneities and measurement artifacts. In particular we consider single-molecule experiments which indirectly measure the distinct steps in a biomolecular process via observations of noisy time-dependent signals such as a fluorescence intensity or bead position. Straightforward hidden Markov model (HMM) analyses attempt to characterize such processes in terms of a set of conformational states, the transitions that can occur between these states, and the associated rates at which those transitions occur; but require ad-hoc post-processing steps to combine multiple signals. Here we develop a hierarchically coupled HMM that allows experimentalists to deal with inter-signal variability in a principled and automatic way. Our approach is a generalized expectation maximization hyperparameter point estimation procedure with variational Bayes at the level of individual time series that learns an single interpretable representation of the overall data generating process.
Jan-Willem van de Meent, Jonathan E. Bronson, Frank D. Wood, Ruben L. Gonzalez, Chris Wiggins 0001
ICML (2)4
2010 Graphical models for inferring single molecule dynamics
abstract
BACKGROUND: The recent explosion of experimental techniques in single molecule biophysics has generated a variety of novel time series data requiring equally novel computational tools for analysis and inference. This article describes in general terms how graphical modeling may be used to learn from biophysical time series data using the variational Bayesian expectation maximization algorithm (VBEM). The discussion is illustrated by the example of single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) versus time data, where the smFRET time series is modeled as a hidden Markov model (HMM) with Gaussian observables. A detailed description of smFRET is provided as well. RESULTS: The VBEM algorithm returns the model's evidence and an approximating posterior parameter distribution given the data. The former provides a metric for model selection via maximum evidence (ME), and the latter a description of the model's parameters learned from the data. ME/VBEM provide several advantages over the more commonly used approach of maximum likelihood (ML) optimized by the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm, the most important being a natural form of model selection and a well-posed (non-divergent) optimization problem. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the utility of graphical modeling for inference of dynamic processes in single molecule biophysics.
Jonathan E. Bronson, Jake M. Hofman, Jingyi Fei, Ruben L. Gonzalez, Chris Wiggins 0001
BMC Bioinform.4