Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William Waites

dblp:123/8404 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-7759-6805ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Machine translation · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
parallel corpus mining
0.412020
ParaCrawl: Web-Scale Acquisition of Parallel Corpora · ACL 2020
Information retrieval
cross-language information retrieval
0.412020
ParaCrawl: Web-Scale Acquisition of Parallel Corpora · ACL 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology › biological model representation
model annotation
0.212016
Annotation of rule-based models with formal semantics to enable creation, analysis, reuse and visualization · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
rule-based modeling
0.212016
Annotation of rule-based models with formal semantics to enable creation, analysis, reuse and visualization · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

web crawling · 0.9automatic alignment · 0.9ontology · 0.2RDF annotation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Testing, tracing and isolation in compartmental models
abstract
Existing compartmental mathematical modelling methods for epidemics, such as SEIR models, cannot accurately represent effects of contact tracing. This makes them inappropriate for evaluating testing and contact tracing strategies to contain an outbreak. An alternative used in practice is the application of agent- or individual-based models (ABM). However ABMs are complex, less well-understood and much more computationally expensive. This paper presents a new method for accurately including the effects of Testing, contact-Tracing and Isolation (TTI) strategies in standard compartmental models. We derive our method using a careful probabilistic argument to show how contact tracing at the individual level is reflected in aggregate on the population level. We show that the resultant SEIR-TTI model accurately approximates the behaviour of a mechanistic agent-based model at far less computational cost. The computational efficiency is such that it can be easily and cheaply used for exploratory modelling to quantify the required levels of testing and tracing, alone and with other interventions, to assist adaptive planning for managing disease outbreaks.
Simone Sturniolo, William Waites, Tim Colbourn, David Manheim, Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths
PLoS Comput. Biol.2
2020 ParaCrawl: Web-Scale Acquisition of Parallel Corpora
abstract
Marta Bañón, Pinzhen Chen, Barry Haddow, Kenneth Heafield, Hieu Hoang, Miquel Esplà-Gomis, Mikel L. Forcada, Amir Kamran, Faheem Kirefu, Philipp Koehn, Sergio Ortiz Rojas, Leopoldo Pla Sempere, Gema Ramírez-Sánchez, Elsa Sarrías, Marek Strelec, Brian Thompson, William Waites, Dion Wiggins, Jaume Zaragoza. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2020.
Marta Bañón, Pinzhen Chen, Barry Haddow, Kenneth Heafield, Hieu Hoang, Miquel Esplà-Gomis, Mikel L. Forcada, Amir Kamran, Faheem Kirefu, Philipp Koehn, Sergio Ortiz-Rojas, Leopoldo Pla Sempere, Gema Ramírez-Sánchez, Elsa Sarrías, Marek Strong, Brian Thompson 0001, William Waites, Dion Wiggins, Jaume Zaragoza
ACL17
2016 Annotation of rule-based models with formal semantics to enable creation, analysis, reuse and visualization
abstract
MOTIVATION: Biological systems are complex and challenging to model and therefore model reuse is highly desirable. To promote model reuse, models should include both information about the specifics of simulations and the underlying biology in the form of metadata. The availability of computationally tractable metadata is especially important for the effective automated interpretation and processing of models. Metadata are typically represented as machine-readable annotations which enhance programmatic access to information about models. Rule-based languages have emerged as a modelling framework to represent the complexity of biological systems. Annotation approaches have been widely used for reaction-based formalisms such as SBML. However, rule-based languages still lack a rich annotation framework to add semantic information, such as machine-readable descriptions, to the components of a model. RESULTS: We present an annotation framework and guidelines for annotating rule-based models, encoded in the commonly used Kappa and BioNetGen languages. We adapt widely adopted annotation approaches to rule-based models. We initially propose a syntax to store machine-readable annotations and describe a mapping between rule-based modelling entities, such as agents and rules, and their annotations. We then describe an ontology to both annotate these models and capture the information contained therein, and demonstrate annotating these models using examples. Finally, we present a proof of concept tool for extracting annotations from a model that can be queried and analyzed in a uniform way. The uniform representation of the annotations can be used to facilitate the creation, analysis, reuse and visualization of rule-based models. Although examples are given, using specific implementations the proposed techniques can be applied to rule-based models in general. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The annotation ontology for rule-based models can be found at http://purl.org/rbm/rbmo The krdf tool and associated executable examples are available at http://purl.org/rbm/rbmo/krdf CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected].
Goksel Misirli, Matteo Cavaliere, William Waites, Matthew R. Pocock, Curtis Madsen, Owen Gilfellon, Ricardo Honorato-Zimmer, Paolo Zuliani, Vincent Danos, Anil Wipat
Bioinform.3