EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Atul Shrivastava
dblp:123/8855
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless networking · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wireless networking
medium access control |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Stack algorithms for random multiple-access networks in the presence of asymmetric feedback · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1990 |
Wireless networking
random access |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Stack algorithms for random multiple-access networks in the presence of asymmetric feedback · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1990 |
Wireless networking › random access
stack algorithm |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Stack algorithms for random multiple-access networks in the presence of asymmetric feedback · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1990 |
Wireless networking
multiaccess network |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Stack algorithms for random multiple-access networks in the presence of asymmetric feedback · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1990 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.0markov chain model · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | Stack algorithms for random multiple-access networks in the presence of asymmetric feedbackabstractThe operation of stack splitting random-access protocols in multiaccess networks in which individual stations may receive asymmetric feedback from the channel (i.e. different stations may observe different, possibly erroneous, outcomes on the channel) is examined. Several possible modifications to the basic stack algorithm are proposed for such environments, and the performances of the various alternatives are reviewed. An approximate Markov chain model is developed to analytically study the time delay versus throughput performance of the various alternatives, and the analytic results are validated through simulation. Representative performance results are given for the alternative stack algorithms. It is found that those algorithms which tend to treat the receipt of corrupted feedback by a station as a collision show superior performance for throughput values greater than approximately 0.2, whereas, at low throughput values, there is relatively little difference between the performances of the various approaches studied. It was noted during the simulation studies that, with an error rate of up to 5%, the algorithms remained stable up to an arrival rate of approximately 0.3 or higher.> James F. Kurose, Atul Shrivastava, Don Towsley |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 2 |