Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maksim Surov
dblp:124/0559
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1165-2296ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Case study in non-prehensile manipulation: planning and orbital stabilization of one-directional rollings for the "Butterfly" robot · ICRA 2015 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › manipulation planning
non-prehensile manipulation planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Case study in non-prehensile manipulation: planning and orbital stabilization of one-directional rollings for the "Butterfly" robot · ICRA 2015 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › stabilization control
orbital stabilization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Case study in non-prehensile manipulation: planning and orbital stabilization of one-directional rollings for the "Butterfly" robot · ICRA 2015 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Case study in non-prehensile manipulation: planning and orbital stabilization of one-directional rollings for the "Butterfly" robot · ICRA 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
virtual holonomic constraints · 0.2transverse linearization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | On performing non-prehensile rolling manipulations: Stabilizing synchronous motions of Butterfly robots⋆abstractThe paper explores the challenging task of performing a non-prehensile manipulation of several balls synchronously rolling on the curved hands of Butterfly robots. Each Butterfly robot represents a standard benchmark hardware setup, comprising a DC motor rotating a butterfly-shaped frame in a vertical plane, with a ball moving freely upon it, equipped with integrated computer vision, communication, programmable control, and computation interfaces. The combined dynamics of the considered system, consisting of N ≥ 2 such robots, is inherently underactuated, characterized by N active and N passive degrees of freedom, as well as N independent unilateral constraints that model the interactions between the frames and the balls, assuming no slipping. We focus on designing a model-based centralized feedback controller to achieve synchronized rotations of the balls. We assume the accuracy of our mathematical model and the feasibility of implementing a discretized version of the proposed continuous-time controller with a sufficiently small sampling time, that, in particular, is necessary for numerical differentiation. Relying on orbital stability of nominal periodic solution of the closed-loop system, we will experimentally check robustness to various inevitable challenges such as noises, disturbances, uncertainties, and communication delays. Hence, our concentration lies in designing an orbitally stabilizing controller for the underactuated models. The primary contribution is proposing one set of transverse coordinates, enabling transverse-linearization-based controller design, accompanied by pertinent closed-loop system analysis tools, thereby enhancing the efficacy of solving the manipulation task. Analytical and model-based arguments are validated through successful simulations and experiments conducted on two Butterfly robots, thereby emphasizing the validity and practicality of the proposed approach. Maksim Surov, Stepan Pchelkin, Anton S. Shiriaev, Sergei V. Gusev, Leonid B. Freidovich |
IROS | 1 |
| 2015 | Case study in non-prehensile manipulation: planning and orbital stabilization of one-directional rollings for the "Butterfly" robotabstractWe approach a problem of motion planning and stabilization for a benchmark example, known as the “Butterfly” robot. It was proposed as a benchmark challenge for developing systematic techniques for nonprehensile rolling manipulation. A dynamical model of the underactuated system with a non-unilateral contact is derived. The recently proposed methodologies, known as virtual-holonomic-constraints-based motion planning and transverse-linearization-based orbital stabilization, are appropriately extended to suit the task. Finally, the feasibility is demonstrated through a hardware implementation and an experimental validation of the concept. Maksim Surov, Anton S. Shiriaev, Leonid B. Freidovich, Sergei V. Gusev, Leonid Paramonov |
ICRA | 1 |