Properties of stable matchings in the popular random-matching-market model have been studied for over 50 years. In a random matching market, each agent has complete preferences drawn uniformly and independently at random. Wilson (1972), Knuth (1976) and Pittel (1989) proved that in balanced random matching markets, the proposers are matched to their ln nth choice on average. In this paper, we consider competitive markets with n jobs and n+k candidates, and partial lists where each agent only ranks their top d choices. Despite the long history of the problem, the following fundamental question remains unanswered for these generalized markets: what is the tight threshold on list length d that results in a perfect stable matching with high probability? In this paper, we answer this question exactly - we prove a sharp threshold d₀ = ln n ⋅ ln (n+k)/(k+1) on the existence of perfect stable matchings when k = o(n). That is, we show that if d < (1-ε) d₀, then no stable matching matches all jobs; moreover, if d > (1+ ε) d₀, then all jobs are matched in every stable matching with high probability. This bound improves and generalizes recent results by Kanoria, Min and Qian (2021). Furthermore, we extend the line of work studying the effect of imbalance on the expected rank of the proposers (termed the "stark effect of competition"). We establish the regime in unbalanced markets that forces this stark effect to take shape in markets with partial preferences.

This paper leverages the framework of algorithms-with-predictions to design data structures for two fundamental dynamic graph problems: incremental topological ordering and cycle detection. In these problems, the input is a directed graph on $n$ nodes, and the $m$ edges arrive one by one. The data structure must maintain a topological ordering of the vertices at all times and detect if the newly inserted edge creates a cycle. The theoretically best worst-case algorithms for these problems have high update cost (polynomial in $n$ and $m$). In practice, greedy heuristics (that recompute the solution from scratch each time) perform well but can have high update cost in the worst case. In this paper, we bridge this gap by leveraging predictions to design a learned new data structure for the problems. Our data structure guarantees consistency, robustness, and smoothness with respect to predictions—that is, it has the best possible running time under perfect predictions, never performs worse than the best-known worst-case methods, and its running time degrades smoothly with the prediction error. Moreover, we demonstrate empirically that predictions, learned from a very small training dataset, are sufficient to provide significant speed-ups on real datasets.

A growing line of work shows how learned predictions can be used to break through worst-case barriers to improve the running time of an algorithm. However, incorporating predictions into data structures with strong theoretical guarantees remains underdeveloped. This paper takes a step in this direction by showing that predictions can be leveraged in the fundamental online list labeling problem. In the problem, $n$ items arrive over time and must be stored in sorted order in an array of size $\Theta(n)$. The array slot of an element is its label and the goal is to maintain sorted order while minimizing the total number of elements moved (i.e., relabeled). We design a new list labeling data structure and bound its performance in two models. In the worst-case learning-augmented model, we give guarantees in terms of the error in the predictions. Our data structure provides strong guarantees: it is optimal for any prediction error and guarantees the best-known worst-case bound even when the predictions are entirely erroneous. We also consider a stochastic error model and bound the performance in terms of the expectation and variance of the error. Finally, the theoretical results are demonstrated empirically. In particular, we show that our data structure has strong performance on real temporal data sets where predictions are constructed from elements that arrived in the past, as is typically done in a practical use case.

Filters are fast, small and approximate set membership data structures. They are often used to filter out expensive accesses to a remote set S for negative queries (that is, a query x not in S). Filters have one-sided errors: on a negative query, a filter may say "present" with a tunable false-positve probability of epsilon. Correctness is traded for space: filters only use log (1/ε) + O(1) bits per element. The false-positive guarantees of most filters, however, hold only for a single query. In particular, if x is a false positive of a filter, a subsequent query to x is a false positive with probability 1, not epsilon. With this in mind, recent work has introduced the notion of an adaptive filter. A filter is adaptive if each query has false positive epsilon, regardless of what queries were made in the past. This requires "fixing" false positives as they occur. Adaptive filters not only provide strong false positive guarantees in adversarial environments but also improve performance on query practical workloads by eliminating repeated false positives. Existing work on adaptive filters falls into two categories. First, there are practical filters based on cuckoo filters that attempt to fix false positives heuristically, without meeting the adaptivity guarantee. Meanwhile, the broom filter is a very complex adaptive filter that meets the optimal theoretical bounds. In this paper, we bridge this gap by designing a practical, provably adaptive filter: the telescoping adaptive filter. We provide theoretical false-positive and space guarantees of our filter, along with empirical results where we compare its false positive performance against state-of-the-art filters. We also test the throughput of our filters, showing that they achieve comparable performance to similar non-adaptive filters.

SIGCSE is packed with teaching insights and inspiration. However, we get these insights and inspiration from hearing our colleagues talk about their teaching. Why not just watch them teach? This session does exactly that. Six exceptional educators will present their favorite piece of innovative lecture content just as they would to their students. The moderator, Colleen Lewis, will describe the central pedagogical move within the innovation and how this connects to education research. The goal of the session is to inspire SIGCSE attendees by highlighting innovative instruction by exceptional educators. The specific content of the innovative instruction may be applicable for some attendees, and the discussion of the underlying pedagogical move within each innovation can be applied across the attendees' teaching.

Given an input stream S of size N , a ɸ-heavy hitter is an item that occurs at least ɸN times in S . The problem of finding heavy-hitters is extensively studied in the database literature. We study a real-time heavy-hitters variant in which an element must be reported shortly after we see its T = ɸ N-th occurrence (and hence it becomes a heavy hitter). We call this the Timely Event Detection ( TED ) Problem. The TED problem models the needs of many real-world monitoring systems, which demand accurate (i.e., no false negatives) and timely reporting of all events from large, high-speed streams with a low reporting threshold (high sensitivity). Like the classic heavy-hitters problem, solving the TED problem without false-positives requires large space (Ω (N) words). Thus in-RAM heavy-hitters algorithms typically sacrifice accuracy (i.e., allow false positives), sensitivity, or timeliness (i.e., use multiple passes). We show how to adapt heavy-hitters algorithms to external memory to solve the TED problem on large high-speed streams while guaranteeing accuracy, sensitivity, and timeliness. Our data structures are limited only by I/O-bandwidth (not latency) and support a tunable tradeoff between reporting delay and I/O overhead. With a small bounded reporting delay, our algorithms incur only a logarithmic I/O overhead. We implement and validate our data structures empirically using the Firehose streaming benchmark. Multi-threaded versions of our structures can scale to process 11M observations per second before becoming CPU bound. In comparison, a naive adaptation of the standard heavy-hitters algorithm to external memory would be limited by the storage device’s random I/O throughput, i.e., ≈100K observations per second.

In this paper, we study the problem of incremental maintenance of Datalog programs and model it as a scheduling problem on DAGs. We design provably good time- and memory-efficient scheduling algorithms for (re)executing a Datalog program where some (but not necessarily all) of the inputs have changed. We prove that our schedulers, called LevelBased and LevelBased with lookahead, have asymptotically improved running time and space efficiency when compared with benchmark algorithms used in production at LogicBlox.The main result of the paper is a hybrid scheduler, which combines LevelBased with the production LogicBlox scheduler (or any other heuristic scheduler). The hybrid scheduler achieves strong worst-case guarantees and robustness without losing out on the best-case behavior of the production LogicBlox scheduler. Our experiments show that the hybrid scheduler results in similar or improved total execution times compared to LogicBlox scheduler, while consistently reducing the scheduling overhead-by as much as 50% on some datasets. This hybrid scheme requires little to no overhead but provides predictability and reliability, which are crucial in a commercial application such as LogicBlox.

Given an input stream of size N, a φ-heavy hitter is an item that occurs at least φ N times in S. The problem of finding heavy-hitters is extensively studied in the database literature. We study a real-time heavy-hitters variant in which an element must be reported shortly after we see its T = φ N-th occurrence (and hence becomes a heavy hitter). We call this the Timely Event Detection (TED) Problem. The TED problem models the needs of many real-world monitoring systems, which demand accurate (i.e., no false negatives) and timely reporting of all events from large, high-speed streams, and with a low reporting threshold (high sensitivity). Like the classic heavy-hitters problem, solving the TED problem without false-positives requires large space (Ω(N) words). Thus in-RAM heavy-hitters algorithms typically sacrifice accuracy (i.e., allow false positives), sensitivity, or timeliness (i.e., use multiple passes). We show how to adapt heavy-hitters algorithms to external memory to solve the TED problem on large high-speed streams while guaranteeing accuracy, sensitivity, and timeliness. Our data structures are limited only by I/O-bandwidth (not latency) and support a tunable trade-off between reporting delay and I/O overhead. With a small bounded reporting delay, our algorithms incur only a logarithmic I/O overhead. We implement and validate our data structures empirically using the Firehose streaming benchmark. Multi-threaded versions of our structures can scale to process 11M observations per second before becoming CPU bound. In comparison, a naive adaptation of the standard heavy-hitters algorithm to external memory would be limited by the storage device's random I/O throughput, i.e., ~100K observations per second.

An approximate membership query data structure (AMQ)-such as a Bloom, quotient, or cuckoo filter-maintains a compact, probabilistic representation of a set S of keys from a universe U. It supports lookups and inserts. Some AMQs also support deletes. A query for x ∈ S returns PRESENT. A query for x ∉ S returns PRESENT with a tunable false-positive probability ε, and otherwise returns ABSENT. AMQs are widely used to speed up dictionaries that are stored remotely (e.g., on disk or across a network). The AMQ is stored locally (e.g., in memory). The remote dictionary is only accessed when the AMQ returns PRESENT. Thus, the primary performance metric of an AMQ is how often it returns ABSENT for negative queries. Existing AMQs offer weak guarantees on the number of false positives in a sequence of queries. The false-positive probability ε holds only for a single query. It is easy for an adversary to drive an AMQ's false-positive rate towards 1 by simply repeating false positives. This paper shows what it takes to get strong guarantees on the number of false positives. We say that an AMQ is adaptive if it guarantees a false-positive probability of ε for every query, regardless of answers to previous queries. We establish upper and lower bounds for adaptive AMQs. Our lower bound shows that it is impossible to build a small adaptive AMQ, even when the AMQ is immediately told whenever a query is a false positive. On the other hand, we show that it is possible to maintain an AMQ that uses the same amount of local space as a non-adaptive AMQ (up to lower order terms), performs all queries and updates in constant time, and guarantees that each negative query to the dictionary accesses remote storage with probability ε, independent of the results of past queries. Thus, we show that adaptivity can be achieved effectively for free.

Interactive proofs model a world where a verifier delegates computation to an untrustworthy prover, verifying the prover's claims before accepting them. These proofs have applications to delegation of computation, probabilistically checkable proofs, crowdsourcing, and more.

We present history-independent alternatives to a B-tree, the primary indexing data structure used in databases. A data structure is history independent (HI) if it is impossible to deduce any information by examining the bit representation of the data structure that is not already available through the API. We show how to build a history-independent cache-oblivious B-tree and a history-independent external-memory skip list. One of the main contributions is a data structure we build on the way---a history-independent packed-memory array (PMA). The PMA supports efficient range queries, one of the most important operations for answering database queries.