Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Karol Kurach

dblp:124/5875 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Generative modeling · 42% Reinforcement learning · 22% Deep learning architectures and training · 14%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.722019
A Large-Scale Study on Regularization and Normalization in GANs · ICML 2019
Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Study · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning environment
0.412020
Google Research Football: A Novel Reinforcement Learning Environment · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
GAN training
0.412019
A Large-Scale Study on Regularization and Normalization in GANs · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
normalization and regularization
0.412019
A Large-Scale Study on Regularization and Normalization in GANs · ICML 2019
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.312018
Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Study · NeurIPS 2018
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue generation
dialogue response generation
0.212016
Smart Reply: Automated Response Suggestion for Email · KDD 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.212016
Smart Reply: Automated Response Suggestion for Email · KDD 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
large-scale inference
0.112016
Smart Reply: Automated Response Suggestion for Email · KDD 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

precision-recall metrics · 0.7hyperparameter optimization · 0.7PPO · 0.4IMPALA · 0.4Ape-X DQN · 0.4sequence-to-sequence generation · 0.2deep learning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Google Research Football: A Novel Reinforcement Learning Environment
abstract
Recent progress in the field of reinforcement learning has been accelerated by virtual learning environments such as video games, where novel algorithms and ideas can be quickly tested in a safe and reproducible manner. We introduce the Google Research Football Environment, a new reinforcement learning environment where agents are trained to play football in an advanced, physics-based 3D simulator. The resulting environment is challenging, easy to use and customize, and it is available under a permissive open-source license. In addition, it provides support for multiplayer and multi-agent experiments. We propose three full-game scenarios of varying difficulty with the Football Benchmarks and report baseline results for three commonly used reinforcement algorithms (IMPALA, PPO, and Ape-X DQN). We also provide a diverse set of simpler scenarios with the Football Academy and showcase several promising research directions.
Karol Kurach, Anton Raichuk, Piotr Stanczyk, Michal Zajac 0005, Olivier Bachem, Lasse Espeholt, Carlos Riquelme, Damien Vincent, Marcin Michalski, Olivier Bousquet, Sylvain Gelly
AAAI1
2020 Adversarial autoencoders for compact representations of 3D point clouds
Maciej Zamorski, Maciej Zieba, Piotr Klukowski, Rafal Nowak, Karol Kurach, Wojciech Stokowiec, Tomasz Trzcinski
Comput. Vis. Image Underst.5
2020 Investigating object compositionality in Generative Adversarial Networks
Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Karol Kurach, Jürgen Schmidhuber, Sylvain Gelly
Neural Networks2
2019 A Large-Scale Study on Regularization and Normalization in GANs
abstract
Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are a class of deep generative models which aim to learn a target distribution in an unsupervised fashion. While they were successfully applied to many problems, training a GAN is a notoriously challenging task and requires a significant number of hyperparameter tuning, neural architecture engineering, and a non-trivial amount of “tricks". The success in many practical applications coupled with the lack of a measure to quantify the failure modes of GANs resulted in a plethora of proposed losses, regularization and normalization schemes, as well as neural architectures. In this work we take a sober view of the current state of GANs from a practical perspective. We discuss and evaluate common pitfalls and reproducibility issues, open-source our code on Github, and provide pre-trained models on TensorFlow Hub.
Karol Kurach, Mario Lucic, Xiaohua Zhai, Marcin Michalski, Sylvain Gelly
ICML1
2018 Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Study
abstract
Generative adversarial networks (GAN) are a powerful subclass of generative models. Despite a very rich research activity leading to numerous interesting GAN algorithms, it is still very hard to assess which algorithm(s) perform better than others. We conduct a neutral, multi-faceted large-scale empirical study on state-of-the art models and evaluation measures. We find that most models can reach similar scores with enough hyperparameter optimization and random restarts. This suggests that improvements can arise from a higher computational budget and tuning more than fundamental algorithmic changes. To overcome some limitations of the current metrics, we also propose several data sets on which precision and recall can be computed. Our experimental results suggest that future GAN research should be based on more systematic and objective evaluation procedures. Finally, we did not find evidence that any of the tested algorithms consistently outperforms the non-saturating GAN introduced in \cite{goodfellow2014generative}.
Mario Lucic, Karol Kurach, Marcin Michalski, Sylvain Gelly, Olivier Bousquet
NeurIPS2
2016 Predicting Dangerous Seismic Activity with Recurrent Neural Networks
abstract
DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.
Karol Kurach, Krzysztof Pawlowski
FedCSIS1
2016 Smart Reply: Automated Response Suggestion for Email
abstract
In this paper we propose and investigate a novel end-to-end method for automatically generating short email responses, called Smart Reply. It generates semantically diverse suggestions that can be used as complete email responses with just one tap on mobile. The system is currently used in Inbox by Gmail and is responsible for assisting with 10% of all mobile responses. It is designed to work at very high throughput and process hundreds of millions of messages daily. The system exploits state-of-the-art, large-scale deep learning.
Anjuli Kannan, Karol Kurach, Sujith Ravi, Tobias Kaufmann 0004, Andrew Tomkins, Balint Miklos, Gregory S. Corrado, László Lukács, Marina Ganea, Vivek Ramavajjala
KDD2
2014 Learning to Discover Efficient Mathematical Identities
Wojciech Zaremba, Karol Kurach, Rob Fergus
NIPS2
2012 An Ensemble Approach to Multi-label Classification of Textual Data
Karol Kurach, Krzysztof Pawlowski, Lukasz Romaszko, Marcin Tatjewski, Andrzej Janusz, Hung Son Nguyen
ADMA1