Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

G. E. Bryan

dblp:124/5941 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1969
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Operating systems › resource management › process management › multiprogramming
time-sharing systems
0.011969
The UTS time-sharing system: performance analysis and instrumentation · SOSP 1969
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.011969
The UTS time-sharing system: performance analysis and instrumentation · SOSP 1969

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mathematical modeling · 0.0instrumentation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1969 The UTS time-sharing system: performance analysis and instrumentation
abstract
An approach is presented to analyzing and controlling hardware and software configurations of a time-sharing system given its load characteristics and desired performance. A mathematical model is developed which predicts response time to both interactive terminal requests and to compute bound programs. Estimates are obtained which relate performance to CPU load, file I/O load, and swap I/O load. Instrumentation contained within the UTS time-sharing system measures actual load and actual response during system operation, These measures suggest standards by which both load and response of time-shared systems could be compared, Extrapolation of the modeled and measured results allows prediction of performance for a variety of hardware configurations and user loads. Administrative controls allow dynamic tuning of the system during actual operation utilizing displays of current performance.
G. E. Bryan, Jack E. Shemer
SOSP1