EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sara Shashaani
dblp:124/6178
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8515-5877ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 3 · 3 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Two-Stage Estimation and Variance Modeling for Latency-Constrained Variational Quantum AlgorithmsabstractThe quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) has enjoyed increasing attention in noisy, intermediate-scale quantum computing with its application to combinatorial optimization problems. QAOA has the potential to demonstrate a quantum advantage for NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems. As a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm, the classical component of QAOA resembles a simulation optimization problem in which the simulation outcomes are attainable only through a quantum computer. The simulation that derives from QAOA exhibits two unique features that can have a substantial impact on the optimization process: (i) the variance of the stochastic objective values typically decreases in proportion to the optimality gap, and (ii) querying samples from a quantum computer introduces an additional latency overhead. In this paper, we introduce a novel stochastic trust-region method derived from a derivative-free, adaptive sampling trust-region optimization method intended to efficiently solve the classical optimization problem in QAOA by explicitly taking into account the two mentioned characteristics. The key idea behind the proposed algorithm involves constructing two separate local models in each iteration: a model of the objective function and a model of the variance of the objective function. Exploiting the variance model allows us to restrict the number of communications with the quantum computer and also helps navigate the nonconvex objective landscapes typical in QAOA optimization problems. We numerically demonstrate the superiority of our proposed algorithm using the SimOpt library and Qiskit when we consider a metric of computational burden that explicitly accounts for communication costs. History: Accepted by Giacomo Nannicini, Area Editor for Quantum Computing and Operations Research. Accepted for Special Issue. Funding: This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers and the Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Accelerated Research for Quantum Computing program under contract number DE-AC02-06CH11357. Y. Ha and S. Shashaani also gratefully acknowledge the U.S. National Science Foundation Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation Grant CMMI-2226347 and the U.S. Office of Naval Research [Grant N000142412398]. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplemental Information ( https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2024.0575 ) as well as from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2024.0575 ). The complete IJOC Software and Data Repository is available at https://informsjoc.github.io/ . Yunsoo Ha, Sara Shashaani, Matt Menickelly |
INFORMS J. Comput. | 2 |
| 2023 | Diagnostic Tools for Evaluating and Comparing Simulation-Optimization AlgorithmsabstractSimulation optimization involves optimizing some objective function that can only be estimated via stochastic simulation. Many important problems can be profitably viewed within this framework. Whereas many solvers—implementations of simulation-optimization algorithms—exist or are in development, comparisons among solvers are not standardized and are often limited in scope. Such comparisons help advance solver development, clarify the relative performance of solvers, and identify classes of problems that defy efficient solution, among many other uses. We develop performance measures and plots, and estimators thereof, to evaluate and compare solvers and diagnose their strengths and weaknesses on a testbed of simulation-optimization problems. We explain the need for two-level simulation in this context and provide supporting convergence theory. We also describe how to use bootstrapping to obtain error estimates for the estimators. History: Accepted by Bruno Tuffin, area editor for simulation. Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [Grants CMMI-2035086, CMMI-2206972, and TRIPODS+X DMS-1839346]. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplementary Information [ https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2022.1261 ] or is available from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC ) at [ http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7329235 ]. David J. Eckman, Shane G. Henderson, Sara Shashaani |
INFORMS J. Comput. | 3 |
| 2023 | SimOpt: A Testbed for Simulation-Optimization ExperimentsabstractThis paper introduces a major redesign of SimOpt, a testbed of simulation-optimization (SO) problems and solvers. The testbed promotes the empirical evaluation and comparison of solvers and aims to accelerate their development. Relative to previous versions of SimOpt, the redesign ports the code to an object-oriented architecture in Python; uses an implementation of the MRG32k3a random number generator that supports streams, substreams, and subsubstreams; supports the automated use of common random numbers for ease and efficiency; includes a powerful suite of plotting tools for visualizing experiment results; uses bootstrapping to obtain error estimates; accommodates the use of data farming to explore simulation models and optimization solvers as their input parameters vary; and provides a graphical user interface. The SimOpt source code is available on a GitHub repository under a permissive open-source license and as a Python package. History: Accepted by Ted Ralphs, Area Editor for Software Tools. Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [Grant CMMI-2035086]. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplemental Information ( https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2023.1273 ) as well as from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2022.0011 ) at ( http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7468744 ). David J. Eckman, Shane G. Henderson, Sara Shashaani |
INFORMS J. Comput. | 3 |