Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jeremy Reffin

dblp:124/7595 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-0080-3685ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › semantic representation learning
semantic composition
0.212016
Improving Sparse Word Representations with Distributional Inference for Semantic Composition · EMNLP 2016
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
word representation
0.212016
Improving Sparse Word Representations with Distributional Inference for Semantic Composition · EMNLP 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distributional inference · 0.2co-occurrence inference · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Improving Sparse Word Representations with Distributional Inference for Semantic Composition
abstract
Distributional models are derived from cooccurrences in a corpus, where only a small proportion of all possible plausible cooccurrences will be observed.This results in a very sparse vector space, requiring a mechanism for inferring missing knowledge.Most methods face this challenge in ways that render the resulting word representations uninterpretable, with the consequence that semantic composition becomes hard to model.In this paper we explore an alternative which involves explicitly inferring unobserved co-occurrences using the distributional neighbourhood.We show that distributional inference improves sparse word representations on several word similarity benchmarks and demonstrate that our model is competitive with the state-of-the-art for adjectivenoun, noun-noun and verb-object compositions while being fully interpretable.
Thomas Kober 0001, Julie Weeds, Jeremy Reffin, David J. Weir
EMNLP3
2016 Aligning Packed Dependency Trees: A Theory of Composition for Distributional Semantics
abstract
We present a new framework for compositional distributional semantics in which the distributional contexts of lexemes are expressed in terms of anchored packed dependency trees. We show that these structures have the potential to capture the full sentential contexts of a lexeme and provide a uniform basis for the composition of distributional knowledge in a way that captures both mutual disambiguation and generalization.
David J. Weir, Julie Weeds, Jeremy Reffin, Thomas Kober 0001
Comput. Linguistics3
2014 Learning to Distinguish Hypernyms and Co-Hyponyms
Julie Weeds, Daoud Clarke, Jeremy Reffin, David J. Weir, Bill Keller
COLING3